Rebecca D Pentz1,2, Minisha Lohani3, Melissa Hayban1, Jeffrey M Switchenko4, Margie D Dixon1, Richard J DeFeo5, Gregg M Orloff1, Ashesh B Jani1,2, Viraj A Master1,2. 1. Department of Hematology and Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. 2. Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia. 3. Medical School, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine-Georgia, Suwanee, Georgia. 4. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia. 5. Care and Counseling Center of Georgia, Inc, Decatur, Georgia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy is the backbone of many cancer therapies; however, the terminology used to describe chemotherapy may be difficult for patients to understand, particularly in underserved populations. Studies have shown that educational videos can improve patient understanding of cancer-related terms. The goal of this study was to identify chemotherapy terms that were difficult for an underserved population to understand and then develop and test educational videos describing these terms. METHODS: A word bank of 50 difficult-to-understand chemotherapy terms was developed by querying 15 providers and 50 patients at an underserved hospital. Twenty of these terms were then tested with 50 additional patients to determine rates of misunderstanding. Six pilot educational videos describing 6 important terms were created using VideoScribe and then assessed with 50 patients to see if they improved understanding. RESULTS: Fifteen of the 20 terms tested to establish rates of misunderstanding were misunderstood by more than one third of patients, with 98% unable to define maintenance, 74% unable to define cancer, and 58% unable to define chemotherapy. Patient understanding of all 6 terms improved by at least 20% after watching the videos. Notable improvement was reported for palliative chemotherapy, where before-and-after video understanding increased from 0% to 72%. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy, a backbone of cancer treatment, is described with terms that are difficult to understand. Short, animated educational videos can significantly increase patient understanding of chemotherapy terminology.
BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy is the backbone of many cancer therapies; however, the terminology used to describe chemotherapy may be difficult for patients to understand, particularly in underserved populations. Studies have shown that educational videos can improve patient understanding of cancer-related terms. The goal of this study was to identify chemotherapy terms that were difficult for an underserved population to understand and then develop and test educational videos describing these terms. METHODS: A word bank of 50 difficult-to-understand chemotherapy terms was developed by querying 15 providers and 50 patients at an underserved hospital. Twenty of these terms were then tested with 50 additional patients to determine rates of misunderstanding. Six pilot educational videos describing 6 important terms were created using VideoScribe and then assessed with 50 patients to see if they improved understanding. RESULTS: Fifteen of the 20 terms tested to establish rates of misunderstanding were misunderstood by more than one third of patients, with 98% unable to define maintenance, 74% unable to define cancer, and 58% unable to define chemotherapy. Patient understanding of all 6 terms improved by at least 20% after watching the videos. Notable improvement was reported for palliative chemotherapy, where before-and-after video understanding increased from 0% to 72%. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy, a backbone of cancer treatment, is described with terms that are difficult to understand. Short, animated educational videos can significantly increase patient understanding of chemotherapy terminology.
Authors: Daniel S Wang; Ashesh B Jani; Musu Sesay; Caroline G Tai; Daniel K Lee; Katharina V Echt; Michael G Goodman; Kerry E Kilbridge; Viraj A Master Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-11-12 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Nancy D Berkman; Stacey L Sheridan; Katrina E Donahue; David J Halpern; Karen Crotty Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2011-07-19 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Levent Dumenci; Robin Matsuyama; Daniel L Riddle; Laura A Cartwright; Robert A Perera; Harold Chung; Laura A Siminoff Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2014
Authors: Shannon Blee; Bari Rosenberg; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Rachel Hianik; Mary Catherine Thomson; Margie Dixon; Mehmet Asim Bilen; Rebecca D Pentz Journal: Immunomedicine Date: 2021-09-02
Authors: Gavin Campbell; Margie D Dixon; Minisha Lohani; John Cook; Rachel Hianik; Mary Catherine Thomson; Eli Abernethy; Colleen Lewis; Jeffrey Switchenko; R Donald Harvey; Rebecca D Pentz Journal: Ethics Hum Res Date: 2022-03
Authors: Laura Nykänen; Daniele Manfredini; Frank Lobbezoo; Antti Kämppi; Anna Colonna; Alessandra Zani; André Mariz Almeida; Alona Emodi-Perlman; Aslak Savolainen; Alessandro Bracci; Jari Ahlberg Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-06-15 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Hannah Claire Sibold; Mary Catherine Thomson; Rachel Hianik; Eli R Abernethy; Gavin P Campbell; Bradley Sumrall; Melissa Dillmon; Josh Simmons; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Margie D Dixon; Rebecca D Pentz Journal: Cancer Date: 2021-07-21 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Shannon M Blee; Jamil Facdol; Margie D Dixon; Viraj Master; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Rebecca D Pentz Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2022-02-02 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Joo Hyun Kim; Elysia Grose; Justine Philteos; David Forner; Christopher W Noel; Vincent Wu; Antoine Eskander Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2021-08-10 Impact factor: 5.591