Literature DB >> 25851945

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Regarding Genetic Testing and Genetic Counselors in Jordan: A Population-Based Survey.

Mamoun Ahram1, Majd Soubani2, Lana Abu Salem2, Haneen Saker2, Muayyad Ahmad3.   

Abstract

Genetic testing has a potential in the prevention of genetic diseases, particularly in communities with high rates of consanguineous marriage. Therefore, knowledge, practice, and attitudes of the public in Jordan regarding genetic testing were investigated. Individuals (N = 3,196) were questioned about the concepts of genetic testing and genetic counselors, if they underwent any genetic tests, the type of test, the method of consenting to the test, as well as their level of satisfaction with the privacy of the genetic testing service. The likelihood of pursuing predictive genetic testing for cancer was also investigated. Although almost 70 % of respondents knew the term "genetic testing," only 18 % had undergone genetic testing, primarily the mandatory premarital test. In addition, there was a lack of general knowledge about genetic counselors. Many of those who had genetic testing (45 %) indicated they did not go through a consent process, and a lack of consent was significantly related to dissatisfaction with the privacy of the service. Approximately 55 % of respondents indicated they would potentially pursue predictive genetic testing for cancer. Going for routine health checkups was not significantly correlated with either actual or potential uptake of genetic testing, suggesting health care providers do not play an influential role in patients' testing decisions. Our results show a gap between the knowledge and uptake of genetic testing and may help to guide the design of effective strategies to initiate successful genetic counseling and testing services.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Genetic counselors; Genetic testing; Jordan; Quantitative research

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25851945     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9839-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  42 in total

Review 1.  Genetic diversity among the Arabs.

Authors:  Ahmad S Teebi; Saeed A Teebi
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2005

2.  General practitioners' attitudes to assessment of genetic risk of common disorders in routine primary care.

Authors:  D McCahon; R Holder; A Metcalfe; S Clifford; P Gill; T Cole; H V Sleightholme; S Wilson
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  The general public's understanding and perception of direct-to-consumer genetic test results.

Authors:  J W Leighton; K Valverde; B A Bernhardt
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Perceived genetic knowledge, attitudes towards genetic testing, and the relationship between these among patients with a chronic disease.

Authors:  Mattijn Morren; Mieke Rijken; Arianne N Baanders; Jozien Bensing
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-08-30

5.  Public experiences, knowledge and expectations about medical genetics and the use of genetic information.

Authors:  Lidewij Henneman; Danielle R M Timmermans; Gerrit van der Wal
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2004

6.  Attitude and knowledge about genetics and genetic testing.

Authors:  H Etchegary; M Cappelli; B Potter; M Vloet; I Graham; M Walker; B Wilson
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 7.  Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase laboratory assay: How, when, and why?

Authors:  Angelo Minucci; Bruno Giardina; Cecilia Zuppi; Ettore Capoluongo
Journal:  IUBMB Life       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.885

8.  US physicians' attitudes toward genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  A N Freedman; L Wideroff; L Olson; W Davis; C Klabunde; K P Srinath; B B Reeve; R T Croyle; R Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  A survey of UK public interest in internet-based personal genome testing.

Authors:  Lynn F Cherkas; Juliette M Harris; Elana Levinson; Tim D Spector; Barbara Prainsack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A population-based study of Ashkenazi Jewish women's attitudes toward genetic discrimination and BRCA1/2 testing.

Authors:  Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Jane C Weeks; Neil Klar; Judy E Garber
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  7 in total

1.  Differences in attitudes toward genetic testing among the public, patients, and health-care professionals in Korea.

Authors:  Heesang Eum; Mangyeong Lee; Junghee Yoon; Juhee Cho; Eun Sook Lee; Kui Son Choi; Sangwon Lee; So-Youn Jung; Myong Cheol Lim; Sun-Young Kong; Yoon Jung Chang
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 2.  The Special Features of Prenatal and Preimplantation Genetic Counseling in Arab Countries.

Authors:  Shaza D Malik; Mashael Al-Shafai; Atiyeh M Abdallah
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 3.  Experiences of breast cancer in Arab countries. A thematic synthesis.

Authors:  D Fearon; S Hughes; S G Brearley
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Parental genetic knowledge and attitudes toward childhood genetic testing for inherited eye diseases.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Sijian Huang; Huiming Xiao; Xiaoyan Ding
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 2.183

Review 5.  Genetic counseling in the context of Bangladesh: current scenario, challenges, and a framework for genetic service implementation.

Authors:  Mohammad Jakir Hosen; Saeed Anwar; Jarin Taslem Mourosi; Sourav Chakraborty; Md Faruque Miah; Olivier M Vanakker
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 4.123

6.  Views of university students in Jordan towards Biobanking.

Authors:  Faisal Khatib; Dayana Jibrin; Joud Al-Majali; Mira Elhussieni; Sharifeh Almasaid; Mamoun Ahram
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Perceptions of provider's epistemic authority in response to variant of uncertain significance-related recommendations.

Authors:  Sukh Makhnoon; Maureen Mork; Banu Arun; Robert J Volk; Susan K Peterson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 2.537

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.