Literature DB >> 23653128

Foraging for thought: an inhibition-of-return-like effect resulting from directing attention within working memory.

Matthew R Johnson1, Julie A Higgins, Kenneth A Norman, Per B Sederberg, Troy A Smith, Marcia K Johnson.   

Abstract

Perceptual processing of a target stimulus may be inhibited if its location has just been cued, a phenomenon of spatial attention known as inhibition of return (IOR). In the research reported here, we demonstrated a striking effect, wherein items that have just been the focus of reflective attention (internal attention to an active representation) also are inhibited. Participants saw two items, followed by a cue to think back to (i.e., refresh, or direct reflective attention toward) one item, and then had to identify either the refreshed item, the unrefreshed item, or a novel item. Responses were significantly slower for refreshed items than for unrefreshed items, although refreshed items were better remembered on a later memory test. Control experiments in which we replaced the refresh event with a second presentation of one of the words did not show similar effects. These results suggest that reflective attention can produce an inhibition effect for attended items that may be analogous to IOR effects in perceptual attention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; memory; refreshing; short-term memory

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23653128      PMCID: PMC3713103          DOI: 10.1177/0956797612466414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  18 in total

1.  Using fMRI to investigate a component process of reflection: prefrontal correlates of refreshing a just-activated representation.

Authors:  Marcia K Johnson; Carol L Raye; Karen J Mitchell; Erich J Greene; William A Cunningham; Charles A Sanislow
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  A brief thought can modulate activity in extrastriate visual areas: Top-down effects of refreshing just-seen visual stimuli.

Authors:  Matthew R Johnson; Karen J Mitchell; Carol L Raye; Mark D'Esposito; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  Reconceptualizing inhibition of return as habituation of the orienting response.

Authors:  Kristie R Dukewich
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

Review 4.  A taxonomy of external and internal attention.

Authors:  Marvin M Chun; Julie D Golomb; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  Neuroimaging a single thought: dorsolateral PFC activity associated with refreshing just-activated information.

Authors:  Carol L Raye; Marcia K Johnson; Karen J Mitchell; John A Reeder; Erich J Greene
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Similar and dissociable mechanisms for attention to internal versus external information.

Authors:  Jennifer K Roth; Marcia K Johnson; Carol L Raye; R Todd Constable
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  The English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08

8.  The consequence of refreshing for access to nonselected items in young and older adults.

Authors:  Julie A Higgins; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-03

9.  How verbal memory loads consume attention.

Authors:  Zhijian Chen; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-09

10.  Top-down enhancement and suppression of activity in category-selective extrastriate cortex from an act of reflective attention.

Authors:  Matthew R Johnson; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  10 in total

1.  The working memory stroop effect: when internal representations clash with external stimuli.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-06-23

2.  The extent of center-surround inhibition for colored items in working memory.

Authors:  Rui Shi; Heming Gao; Qi Zhang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-11-16

3.  Center-Surround Inhibition in Working Memory.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Electrophysiological Correlates of Refreshing: Event-related Potentials Associated with Directing Reflective Attention to Face, Scene, or Word Representations.

Authors:  Matthew R Johnson; Gregory McCarthy; Kathleen A Muller; Samuel N Brudner; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The effect of the brightness metaphor on memory.

Authors:  Shijia Zhang; Jianhong Zheng; Lei Mo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-10-24

6.  Competition between items in working memory leads to forgetting.

Authors:  Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock; Kenneth A Norman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Finding the answer in space: the mental whiteboard hypothesis on serial order in working memory.

Authors:  Elger Abrahamse; Jean-Philippe van Dijck; Steve Majerus; Wim Fias
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Working memory operates over the same representations as attention.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Yanyan Ye; Jiushu Xie; Tiansheng Xia; Lei Mo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Inhibition-of-return-like effects in working memory? A preregistered replication study of Johnson et al. (2013).

Authors:  Naomi Langerock; Giuliana Sposito; Caro Hautekiet; Evie Vergauwe
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 10.  Trisecting representational states in short-term memory.

Authors:  Derek Evan Nee; John Jonides
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.