Literature DB >> 26711496

Center-Surround Inhibition in Working Memory.

Anastasia Kiyonaga1, Tobias Egner2.   

Abstract

Directing visual attention toward a particular feature or location in the environment suppresses processing of nearby stimuli [1-4]. Echoing the center-surround organization of retinal ganglion cell receptive fields [5], and biasing of competitive local neuronal dynamics in favor of task-relevant stimuli [6], this "inhibitory surround" attention mechanism accentuates the demarcation between task-relevant and irrelevant items. Here, we show that internally maintaining a color stimulus in working memory (WM), rather than visually attending the stimulus in the external environment, produces an analogous pattern of inhibition for stimuli that are nearby in color space. Replicating a well-known effect of attentional capture by stimuli that match WM content [7], visual attention was biased toward (task-irrelevant) stimuli that exactly matched a WM item. This bias was curtailed, however, for stimuli that were very similar to the WM content (i.e., within the inhibitory zone surrounding the focus of WM) and recovered for less similar stimuli (i.e., beyond the bounds of the inhibitory surround). Moreover, the expression of this inhibition effect was positively associated with WM performance across observers. In a second experiment, inhibition also occurred between two similar items simultaneously held in WM. This suggests that maintenance in WM is characterized by an excitatory peak centered on the focus of (internal) attention, surrounded by an inhibitory zone to limit interference by irrelevant and confusable representations. Here, thus, we show for the first time that the same center-surround selection mechanism that focuses visual attention on sensory stimuli also selectively maintains internally activated representations in WM.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26711496      PMCID: PMC4713284          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  35 in total

1.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; J Jonides
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 2.  The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

3.  The working memory stroop effect: when internal representations clash with external stimuli.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-06-23

4.  Foraging for thought: an inhibition-of-return-like effect resulting from directing attention within working memory.

Authors:  Matthew R Johnson; Julie A Higgins; Kenneth A Norman; Per B Sederberg; Troy A Smith; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-05-07

5.  Feature-based attention elicits surround suppression in feature space.

Authors:  Viola S Störmer; George A Alvarez
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Attentional selection: Mexican hats everywhere.

Authors:  Stefan Treue
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 7.  Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 8.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 9.  Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory.

Authors:  Steven L Franconeri; George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Resource-sharing between internal maintenance and external selection modulates attentional capture by working memory content.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  22 in total

1.  A Flexible Model of Working Memory.

Authors:  Flora Bouchacourt; Timothy J Buschman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Chunking as a rational strategy for lossy data compression in visual working memory.

Authors:  Matthew R Nassar; Julie C Helmers; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  The extent of center-surround inhibition for colored items in working memory.

Authors:  Rui Shi; Heming Gao; Qi Zhang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-11-16

4.  Increased repulsion of working memory representations in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Sonia Bansal; Gi-Yeul Bae; Kyle Frankovich; Benjamin M Robinson; Carly J Leonard; James M Gold; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2020-09-03

5.  Visual Memories Bypass Normalization.

Authors:  Ilona M Bloem; Yurika L Watanabe; Melissa M Kibbe; Sam Ling
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-03-29

6.  The profile of attentional modulation to visual features.

Authors:  Ming W H Fang; Taosheng Liu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  Distraction in Visual Working Memory: Resistance is Not Futile.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Lorenc; Remington Mallett; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Hemisphere-specific Parietal Contributions to the Interplay between Working Memory and Attention.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; John P Powers; Yu-Chin Chiu; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.420

9.  Understanding occipital and parietal contributions to visual working memory: Commentary on Xu (2020).

Authors:  Chunyue Teng; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2021-02-15

10.  Scene wheels: Measuring perception and memory of real-world scenes with a continuous stimulus space.

Authors:  Gaeun Son; Dirk B Walther; Michael L Mack
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-07-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.