Literature DB >> 24951607

Breast cancer, BRCA mutations, and attitudes regarding pregnancy and preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Ashley H Woodson1, Kimberly I Muse1, Heather Lin1, Michelle Jackson1, Danielle N Mattair1, Leslie Schover1, Terri Woodard1, Laurie McKenzie1, Richard L Theriault1, Gabriel N Hortobágyi1, Banu Arun1, Susan K Peterson1, Jessica Profato1, Jennifer K Litton2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women with premenopausal breast cancer may face treatment-related infertility and have a higher likelihood of a BRCA mutation, which may affect their attitudes toward future childbearing.
METHODS: Premenopausal women were invited to participate in a questionnaire study administered before and after BRCA genetic testing. We used the Impact of Event Scale (IES) to evaluate the pre- and post-testing impact of cancer or carrying a BRCA mutation on attitudes toward future childbearing. The likelihood of pursuing prenatal diagnosis (PND) or preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) was also assessed in this setting. Univariate analyses determined factors contributing to attitudes toward future childbearing and likelihood of PND or PGD.
RESULTS: One hundred forty-eight pretesting and 114 post-testing questionnaires were completed. Women with a personal history of breast cancer had less change in IES than those with no history of breast cancer (p = .003). The 18 BRCA-positive women had a greater change in IES than the BRCA-negative women (p = .005). After testing, 31% and 24% of women would use PND and PGD, respectively. BRCA results did not significantly affect attitudes toward PND/PGD.
CONCLUSION: BRCA results and history of breast cancer affect the psychological impact on future childbearing. Intentions to undergo PND or PGD do not appear to change after disclosure of BRCA results. Additional counseling for patients who have undergone BRCA testing may be warranted to educate patients about available fertility preservation options. ©AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA; Breast cancer; Fertility; Genetics; Preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24951607      PMCID: PMC4122483          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  40 in total

1.  Closed blastocyst vitrification of biopsied embryos: evaluation of 100 consecutive warming cycles.

Authors:  L Van Landuyt; W Verpoest; G Verheyen; A De Vos; H Van de Velde; I Liebaers; P Devroey; E Van den Abbeel
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Attitudes to reproductive genetic testing in women who had a positive BRCA test before having children: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ormondroyd; Louise Donnelly; Clare Moynihan; Cornelie Savona; Elizabeth Bancroft; D Gareth Evans; Rosalind Eeles; Stuart Lavery; Maggie Watson
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Reduction of the multiple pregnancy rate in a preimplantation genetic diagnosis programme after introduction of single blastocyst transfer and cryopreservation of blastocysts biopsied on day 3.

Authors:  Tarek El-Toukhy; Ahmed Kamal; Eleanor Wharf; Jan Grace; Virginia Bolton; Yacoub Khalaf; Peter Braude
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Cancer statistics, 2012.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Deepa Naishadham; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Emotional distress following genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Marci Lobel; Anne Moyer
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  The trajectory of psychological impact in BRCA1/2 genetic testing: does time heal?

Authors:  Tammy M Beran; Annette L Stanton; Lorna Kwan; Joyce Seldon; Julienne E Bower; Andrea Vodermaier; Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2008-09-12

7.  Cancer risk reduction and reproductive concerns in female BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Ashley D Staton; Allison W Kurian; Kristin Cobb; Meredith A Mills; James M Ford
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 8.  Cancer and its treatment effect on young breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Dawn Camp-Sorrell
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.315

9.  Attitudes of high-risk women toward preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Gwendolyn Quinn; Susan Vadaparampil; Crystal Wilson; Lindsey King; Jimin Choi; Cheryl Miree; Sue Friedman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Ethical, legal and social implications of prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  C-W Wang; E C Hui
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.828

View more
  6 in total

1.  Uptake of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis in Female BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Pnina Mor; Sarah Brennenstuhl; Kelly A Metcalfe
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Reproductive Decision-Making in Women with BRCA1/2 Mutations.

Authors:  Jessica L Chan; Lauren N C Johnson; Mary D Sammel; Laura DiGiovanni; Chan Voong; Susan M Domchek; Clarisa R Gracia
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  "It was an Emotional Baby": Previvors' Family Planning Decision-Making Styles about Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Marleah Dean; Emily A Rauscher
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Breast cancer in adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Rebecca H Johnson; Carey K Anders; Jennifer K Litton; Kathryn J Ruddy; Archie Bleyer
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 5.  Progress in the clinical detection of heterogeneity in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jun-Long Song; Chuang Chen; Jing-Ping Yuan; Sheng-Rong Sun
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Combined diagnosis of breast cancer in the early stage by MRI and detection of gene expression.

Authors:  Dena Ke; Rong Yang; Lina Jing
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.447

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.