Literature DB >> 19594276

Emotional distress following genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a meta-analytic review.

Jada G Hamilton1, Marci Lobel, Anne Moyer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Meta-analysis was used to synthesize results of studies on emotional consequences of predictive genetic testing for BRCA1/2 mutations conferring increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer.
DESIGN: Studies assessing anxiety or cancer-specific distress before and after provision of test results (k = 20) were analyzed using a random-effects model. Moderator variables included country of data collection and personal cancer history of study participants. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Standardized mean gain effect sizes were calculated for mutation carriers, noncarriers, and those with inconclusive results over short (0-4 weeks), moderate (5-24 weeks), or long (25-52 weeks) periods of time after testing.
RESULTS: Distress among carriers increased shortly after receiving results and returned to pretesting levels over time. Distress among noncarriers and those with inconclusive results decreased over time. Some distress patterns differed in studies conducted outside the United States and for individuals with varying cancer histories.
CONCLUSION: Results underscore the importance of time; changes in distress observed shortly after test-result disclosure frequently differed from the pattern of distress seen subsequently. Although emotional consequences of this testing appear minimal, it remains possible that testing may affect cognitive and behavioral outcomes, which have rarely been examined through meta-analysis. Testing may also affect understudied subgroups differently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19594276      PMCID: PMC2807362          DOI: 10.1037/a0014778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  52 in total

Review 1.  Adherence and psychological adjustment among women at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  C Lerman; M Schwartz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2.

Authors:  R Wooster; G Bignell; J Lancaster; S Swift; S Seal; J Mangion; N Collins; S Gregory; C Gumbs; G Micklem
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995 Dec 21-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Psychological issues in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  C Lerman; R Croyle
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1994-03-28

4.  A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1.

Authors:  Y Miki; J Swensen; D Shattuck-Eidens; P A Futreal; K Harshman; S Tavtigian; Q Liu; C Cochran; L M Bennett; W Ding
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-10-07       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  BRCA1 testing in families with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. A prospective study of patient decision making and outcomes.

Authors:  C Lerman; S Narod; K Schulman; C Hughes; A Gomez-Caminero; G Bonney; K Gold; B Trock; D Main; J Lynch; C Fulmore; C Snyder; S J Lemon; T Conway; P Tonin; G Lenoir; H Lynch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-06-26       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Emotional and behavioral responses to genetic testing for susceptibility to cancer.

Authors:  C Lerman; R T Croyle
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.990

7.  Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening.

Authors:  C Lerman; B Trock; B K Rimer; C Jepson; D Brody; A Boyce
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  The genetic attributable risk of breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  E B Claus; J M Schildkraut; W D Thompson; N J Risch
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Anticipated uptake and impact of genetic testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families.

Authors:  J P Struewing; C Lerman; R G Kase; T R Giambarresi; M A Tucker
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Familial breast cancer: a controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling.

Authors:  S Lloyd; M Watson; B Waites; L Meyer; R Eeles; S Ebbs; A Tylee
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  86 in total

1.  Long-term reactions to genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: does time heal women's concerns?

Authors:  Chanita Hughes Halbert; Jill E Stopfer; Jasmine McDonald; Benita Weathers; Aliya Collier; Andrea B Troxel; Susan Domchek
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  The Life Course Perspective: a Guide for Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Rebekah J Hamilton; Nancy A Innella; Dawn T Bounds
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Elucidating Genetic Counseling Outcomes from the Perspective of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Heather A Zierhut; K M Shannon; D L Cragun; S A Cohen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Specific psychosocial issues of individuals undergoing genetic counseling for cancer - a literature review.

Authors:  Willem Eijzenga; Daniela E E Hahn; Neil K Aaronson; Irma Kluijt; Eveline M A Bleiker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Predictive Genetic Testing and Alternatives to Face to Face Results Disclosure: A Retrospective Review of Patients Preference for Alternative Modes of BRCA 1 and 2 Results Disclosure in the Republic of Ireland.

Authors:  Rosie O'Shea; Marie Meany; Cliona Carroll; Nuala Cody; David Healy; Andrew Green; Sally Ann Lynch
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Breast cancer, BRCA mutations, and attitudes regarding pregnancy and preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Ashley H Woodson; Kimberly I Muse; Heather Lin; Michelle Jackson; Danielle N Mattair; Leslie Schover; Terri Woodard; Laurie McKenzie; Richard L Theriault; Gabriel N Hortobágyi; Banu Arun; Susan K Peterson; Jessica Profato; Jennifer K Litton
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-06-20

Review 7.  Cancer-related direct-to-consumer advertising: a critical review.

Authors:  Emily Z Kontos; K Viswanath
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Breast Cancer Survivors' Knowledge of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer following Genetic Counseling: An Exploration of General and Survivor-Specific Knowledge Items.

Authors:  Courtney L Scherr; Juliette Christie; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.000

9.  Psychiatric genetics researchers' views on offering return of results to individual participants.

Authors:  Kristin M Kostick; Cody Brannan; Stacey Pereira; Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.568

10.  Improved health perception after genetic counselling for women at high risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer: construction of new questionnaires--an Italian exploratory study.

Authors:  Chiara Catania; Irene Feroce; Monica Barile; Aron Goldhirsch; Tommaso De Pas; Filippo de Braud; Sabrina Boselli; Laura Adamoli; Davide Radice; Alessandra Rossi; Gianluca Spitaleri; Cristina Noberasco; Bernardo Bonanni
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.