Literature DB >> 21811309

Attitudes to reproductive genetic testing in women who had a positive BRCA test before having children: a qualitative analysis.

Elizabeth Ormondroyd1, Louise Donnelly, Clare Moynihan, Cornelie Savona, Elizabeth Bancroft, D Gareth Evans, Rosalind Eeles, Stuart Lavery, Maggie Watson.   

Abstract

The scope of conditions for which preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is licensed has recently been expanded in the United Kingdom to include genetic predisposition to adult-onset cancer. This qualitative interview study explores reproductive decision making, knowledge of and attitudes to reproductive genetic testing (prenatal diagnosis and PGD) with 25 women aged 18-45 years who received a positive BRCA test in the United Kingdom before having children. In this cohort of younger women, BRCA testing was motivated by risk management decisions; for some, BRCA status has affected their later decisions about having children. The perceived severity of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC) influences thoughts about passing on the mutation to children and willingness to consider reproductive genetic testing, but most participants do not believe HBOC is a condition for which pregnancy termination is justified. PGD is considered more acceptable and advantageous because it would prevent transmission to future generations, but women have concerns about selecting embryos and the fact that they and affected family members would not have been selected. Women would also be deterred by the need to undergo in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and ovarian stimulation for PGD. Awareness of reproductive testing options was very variable among the cohort. The findings highlight the complexities of reproductive decision making for young women who knowingly carry a BRCA mutation, and the dilemmas inherent to reproductive genetic testing when the condition being tested for also affects a prospective parent. Counselling and psychological support for BRCA-positive women and couples concerning reproductive options are strongly indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21811309      PMCID: PMC3234514          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  30 in total

1.  Commentary on Spriggs: genetically selected baby free of inherited predisposition to early onset Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  M B Delatycki
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  BRCA carriers' thoughts on risk management in relation to preimplantation genetic diagnosis and childbearing: when too many choices are just as difficult as none.

Authors:  Gwendolyn P Quinn; Susan T Vadaparampil; Sharon Tollin; Cheryl A Miree; Devin Murphy; Bethanne Bower; Celso Silva
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies.

Authors:  A Antoniou; P D P Pharoah; S Narod; H A Risch; J E Eyfjord; J L Hopper; N Loman; H Olsson; O Johannsson; A Borg; B Pasini; P Radice; S Manoukian; D M Eccles; N Tang; E Olah; H Anton-Culver; E Warner; J Lubinski; J Gronwald; B Gorski; H Tulinius; S Thorlacius; H Eerola; H Nevanlinna; K Syrjäkoski; O-P Kallioniemi; D Thompson; C Evans; J Peto; F Lalloo; D G Evans; D F Easton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Is there an ethical difference between preimplantation genetic diagnosis and abortion?

Authors:  C Cameron; R Williamson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers.

Authors:  L C Hartmann; T A Sellers; D J Schaid; T S Frank; C L Soderberg; D L Sitta; M H Frost; C S Grant; J H Donohue; J E Woods; S K McDonnell; C W Vockley; A Deffenbaugh; F J Couch; R B Jenkins
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-11-07       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Risk of cancer after use of fertility drugs with in-vitro fertilisation.

Authors:  A Venn; L Watson; F Bruinsma; G Giles; D Healy
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-11-06       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Clinical follow-up after bilateral risk reducing ('prophylactic') mastectomy: mental health and body image outcomes.

Authors:  P Hopwood; A Lee; A Shenton; A Baildam; A Brain; F Lalloo; G Evans; A Howell
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Variation in cancer risks, by mutation position, in BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  D Thompson; D Easton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Cancer Incidence in BRCA1 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Deborah Thompson; Douglas F Easton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-09-18       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: patients' experiences and attitudes.

Authors:  S A Lavery; R Aurell; C Turner; C Castello; A Veiga; P N Barri; R M Winston
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  25 in total

1.  Attitudes Toward Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) for Genetic Disorders Among Potential Users in Malaysia.

Authors:  Angelina Patrick Olesen; Siti Nurani Mohd Nor; Latifah Amin
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Performing and Declining PGD: Accounts of Jewish Israeli Women Who Carry a BRCA1/2 Mutation or Partners of Male Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Efrat Dagan; Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli; Eitan Friedman; Baruch Feldman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Uptake of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis in Female BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Pnina Mor; Sarah Brennenstuhl; Kelly A Metcalfe
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Breast cancer, BRCA mutations, and attitudes regarding pregnancy and preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Ashley H Woodson; Kimberly I Muse; Heather Lin; Michelle Jackson; Danielle N Mattair; Leslie Schover; Terri Woodard; Laurie McKenzie; Richard L Theriault; Gabriel N Hortobágyi; Banu Arun; Susan K Peterson; Jessica Profato; Jennifer K Litton
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-06-20

5.  Pregnancy after Breast Cancer: Myths and Facts.

Authors:  Olivia Pagani; Hatem Azim
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Reproductive Decision-Making in Women with BRCA1/2 Mutations.

Authors:  Jessica L Chan; Lauren N C Johnson; Mary D Sammel; Laura DiGiovanni; Chan Voong; Susan M Domchek; Clarisa R Gracia
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  The Influence of Adolescence on Parents' Perspectives of Testing and Discussing Inherited Cancer Predisposition.

Authors:  Corinna L Schultz; Melissa A Alderfer; Robert B Lindell; Zachary McClain; Kristin Zelley; Kim E Nichols; Carol A Ford
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  "Would you test your children without their consent?" and other sticky dilemmas in the field of cancer genetic testing.

Authors:  Karina L Brierley; Danielle C Bonadies; Anne Moyer; Ellen T Matloff
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Acceptable applications of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) among Israeli PGD users.

Authors:  Shachar Zuckerman; David A Zeevi; Sigal Gooldin; Gheona Altarescu
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Exploration of Male Attitudes on Partnerships and Sexuality with Female BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Caitlin Mauer; Sara Spencer; Jeffery Dungan; Karen Hurley
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.