BACKGROUND: Women with mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 cancer susceptibility genes face unique choices regarding management of their high risk for breast and ovarian cancer that impact their reproductive options. In order to explore women's preferences for management of elevated cancer risk, we evaluated the decisions of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers about contraception, prophylactic surgery, and family planning. METHODS: An internet-based questionnaire assessing high-risk women's preferences about cancer risk management and reproductive options was designed, pilot-tested and administered electronically to 284 participants of an internet-based advocacy group for women with BRCA1/2 mutations. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirteen eligible participants completed the majority of the survey. Mean age was 34 years; 66% were BRCA1 mutation carriers and 34% were BRCA2 mutation carriers. Most women (92%) had used oral contraceptive pills. About 88% of responders reported frequent or extreme worry about transmitting the mutation to their children. Despite their high level of worry, few responders said they would likely consider using assisted reproduction technologies such as a pregnancy surrogate (3%), cryopreservation of oocytes or embryos (8%), or pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to select embryos without BRCA1/2 mutations (13%). CONCLUSIONS: Although they expressed substantial concern about transmitting BRCA1/2 mutations to their children, only a minority of the high-risk women surveyed were likely to consider currently available assisted reproductive strategies. Further research is necessary to explore the risk management preferences of patients with inherited cancer predisposition, and to incorporate these preferences into clinical care.
BACKGROUND:Women with mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2cancer susceptibility genes face unique choices regarding management of their high risk for breast and ovarian cancer that impact their reproductive options. In order to explore women's preferences for management of elevated cancer risk, we evaluated the decisions of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers about contraception, prophylactic surgery, and family planning. METHODS: An internet-based questionnaire assessing high-risk women's preferences about cancer risk management and reproductive options was designed, pilot-tested and administered electronically to 284 participants of an internet-based advocacy group for women with BRCA1/2 mutations. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirteen eligible participants completed the majority of the survey. Mean age was 34 years; 66% were BRCA1 mutation carriers and 34% were BRCA2 mutation carriers. Most women (92%) had used oral contraceptive pills. About 88% of responders reported frequent or extreme worry about transmitting the mutation to their children. Despite their high level of worry, few responders said they would likely consider using assisted reproduction technologies such as a pregnancy surrogate (3%), cryopreservation of oocytes or embryos (8%), or pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to select embryos without BRCA1/2 mutations (13%). CONCLUSIONS: Although they expressed substantial concern about transmitting BRCA1/2 mutations to their children, only a minority of the high-risk women surveyed were likely to consider currently available assisted reproductive strategies. Further research is necessary to explore the risk management preferences of patients with inherited cancer predisposition, and to incorporate these preferences into clinical care.
Authors: Steven A Narod; Marie-Pierre Dubé; Jan Klijn; Jan Lubinski; Henry T Lynch; Parviz Ghadirian; Diane Provencher; Ketil Heimdal; Pal Moller; Mark Robson; Kenneth Offit; Claudine Isaacs; Barbara Weber; Eitan Friedman; Ruth Gershoni-Baruch; Gad Rennert; Barbara Pasini; Theresa Wagner; Mary Daly; Judy E Garber; Susan L Neuhausen; Peter Ainsworth; Hakan Olsson; Gareth Evans; Michael Osborne; Fergus Couch; William D Foulkes; Ellen Warner; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Olufunmilayo Olopade; Nadine Tung; Howard M Saal; Jeffrey Weitzel; Sofia Merajver; Marion Gauthier-Villars; Helena Jernstrom; Ping Sun; Jean-Sebastien Brunet Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2002-12-04 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Allison W Kurian; Anne-Renee Hartman; Meredith A Mills; James M Ford; Bruce L Daniel; Sylvia K Plevritis Journal: Health Expect Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Roger L Milne; Julia A Knight; Esther M John; Gillian S Dite; Ronald Balbuena; Argyrios Ziogas; Irene L Andrulis; Dee W West; Frederick P Li; Melissa C Southey; Graham G Giles; Margaret R E McCredie; John L Hopper; Alice S Whittemore Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: C Spits; M De Rycke; N Van Ranst; W Verpoest; W Lissens; A Van Steirteghem; I Liebaers; K Sermon Journal: Prenat Diagn Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 3.050
Authors: Carey A Cullinane; Jan Lubinski; Susan L Neuhausen; Parviz Ghadirian; Henry T Lynch; Claudine Isaacs; Barbara Weber; Pal Moller; Kenneth Offit; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Eitan Friedman; Susan Randall; Barbara Pasini; Peter Ainsworth; Ruth Gershoni-Baruch; William D Foulkes; Jan Klijn; Nadine Tung; Gad Rennert; Olufunmilayo Olopade; Fergus Couch; Teresa Wagner; Hakan Olsson; Ping Sun; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Steven A Narod Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2005-12-20 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Mary B Daly; Robert Pilarski; Jennifer E Axilbund; Saundra S Buys; Beth Crawford; Susan Friedman; Judy E Garber; Carolyn Horton; Virginia Kaklamani; Catherine Klein; Wendy Kohlmann; Allison Kurian; Jennifer Litton; Lisa Madlensky; P Kelly Marcom; Sofia D Merajver; Kenneth Offit; Tuya Pal; Boris Pasche; Gwen Reiser; Kristen Mahoney Shannon; Elizabeth Swisher; Nicoleta C Voian; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Alison Whelan; Georgia L Wiesner; Mary A Dwyer; Rashmi Kumar Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Ashley H Woodson; Kimberly I Muse; Heather Lin; Michelle Jackson; Danielle N Mattair; Leslie Schover; Terri Woodard; Laurie McKenzie; Richard L Theriault; Gabriel N Hortobágyi; Banu Arun; Susan K Peterson; Jessica Profato; Jennifer K Litton Journal: Oncologist Date: 2014-06-20
Authors: Eveline M A Bleiker; Mary Jane Esplen; Bettina Meiser; Helle Vendel Petersen; Andrea Farkas Patenaude Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 2.375