Literature DB >> 19891845

Ethical, legal and social implications of prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.

C-W Wang1, E C Hui.   

Abstract

With the progress in cancer genetics and assisted reproductive technologies, it is now possible for cancer gene mutation carriers not only to reduce cancer mortality through the targeting of surveillance and preventive therapies, but also to avoid the birth of at-risk babies through the choice of different means of reproduction. Thus, the incidence of hereditary cancer syndromes may be decreased in the future. The integration of cancer genetic testing and assisted reproductive technologies raises certain ethical, legal and social issues beyond either genetic testing or assisted reproductive technology itself. In this paper, the reproductive decisions/choices of at-risk young couples and the ethical, legal and social concerns of prenatal genetic testing and preimplantation genetic diagnosis for susceptibility to hereditary cancer syndromes are discussed. Specifically, three ethical principles related to the integration of cancer genetic testing and assisted reproductive technologies, i.e. informed choice, beneficence to children and social justice, and their implications for the responsible translation of these medical techniques into common practice of preventive medicine are highlighted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19891845     DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60274-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  7 in total

1.  Breast cancer, BRCA mutations, and attitudes regarding pregnancy and preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Ashley H Woodson; Kimberly I Muse; Heather Lin; Michelle Jackson; Danielle N Mattair; Leslie Schover; Terri Woodard; Laurie McKenzie; Richard L Theriault; Gabriel N Hortobágyi; Banu Arun; Susan K Peterson; Jessica Profato; Jennifer K Litton
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-06-20

2.  Incorporating information regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis into discussions concerning testing and risk management for BRCA1/2 mutations: a qualitative study of patient preferences.

Authors:  Karen Hurley; Lisa R Rubin; Allison Werner-Lin; Michal Sagi; Yelena Kemel; Rikki Stern; Aliza Phillips; Ina Cholst; Noah Kauff; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for inherited neurological disorders.

Authors:  Ilan Tur-Kaspa; Roohi Jeelani; P Murali Doraiswamy
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 4.  Breast cancer and fertility.

Authors:  Jennifer K Litton
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2012-06

5.  "It was an Emotional Baby": Previvors' Family Planning Decision-Making Styles about Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Marleah Dean; Emily A Rauscher
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Unraveling preimplantation genetic diagnosis for high-risk couples: implications for nurses at the front line of care.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Catherine Schoenfeld; Ilan Tur-Kaspa
Journal:  Nurs Womens Health       Date:  2011 Feb-Mar

7.  Uptake of prenatal diagnostic testing for retinoblastoma compared to other hereditary cancer syndromes in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Charlotte J Dommering; Lidewij Henneman; Annemarie H van der Hout; Marianne A Jonker; Carli M J Tops; Ans M W van den Ouweland; Rob B van der Luijt; Arjen R Mensenkamp; Frans B L Hogervorst; Egbert J W Redeker; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Annette C Moll; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.375

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.