Literature DB >> 24916295

Cerebellar and prefrontal cortex contributions to adaptation, strategies, and reinforcement learning.

Jordan A Taylor1, Richard B Ivry2.   

Abstract

Traditionally, motor learning has been studied as an implicit learning process, one in which movement errors are used to improve performance in a continuous, gradual manner. The cerebellum figures prominently in this literature given well-established ideas about the role of this system in error-based learning and the production of automatized skills. Recent developments have brought into focus the relevance of multiple learning mechanisms for sensorimotor learning. These include processes involving repetition, reinforcement learning, and strategy utilization. We examine these developments, considering their implications for understanding cerebellar function and how this structure interacts with other neural systems to support motor learning. Converging lines of evidence from behavioral, computational, and neuropsychological studies suggest a fundamental distinction between processes that use error information to improve action execution or action selection. While the cerebellum is clearly linked to the former, its role in the latter remains an open question.
© 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; ataxia; basal ganglia; cerebellum; error-based learning; prefrontal cortex; reinforcement learning; sensorimotor learning; systems interaction

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24916295      PMCID: PMC4118688          DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63356-9.00009-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  126 in total

1.  The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation.

Authors:  Steven W Keele; Richard Ivry; Ulrich Mayr; Eliot Hazeltine; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Implicit and explicit adjustments to extrinsic visuo-motor transformations and their age-related changes.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Mathias Hegele; Sandra Sülzenbrück
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 2.161

3.  The cerebellum communicates with the basal ganglia.

Authors:  Eiji Hoshi; Léon Tremblay; Jean Féger; Peter L Carras; Peter L Strick
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-10-02       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Purkinje cell activity during motor learning.

Authors:  P F Gilbert; W T Thach
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1977-06-10       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Basal ganglia-dependent processes in recalling learned visual-motor adaptations.

Authors:  Patrick Bédard; Jerome N Sanes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Climbing fibre induced depression of both mossy fibre responsiveness and glutamate sensitivity of cerebellar Purkinje cells.

Authors:  M Ito; M Sakurai; P Tongroach
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  The contribution of visual feedback to visuomotor adaptation: how much and when?

Authors:  Mark R Hinder; James R Tresilian; Stephan Riek; Richard G Carson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Cerebellar rTMS disrupts predictive language processing.

Authors:  Elise Lesage; Blaire E Morgan; Andrew C Olson; Antje S Meyer; R Chris Miall
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Flexible cognitive strategies during motor learning.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Striatal activity underlies novelty-based choice in humans.

Authors:  Bianca C Wittmann; Nathaniel D Daw; Ben Seymour; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  68 in total

1.  Blocking trial-by-trial error correction does not interfere with motor learning in human walking.

Authors:  Andrew W Long; Ryan T Roemmich; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Flexible explicit but rigid implicit learning in a visuomotor adaptation task.

Authors:  Krista M Bond; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Explicit and Implicit Processes Constitute the Fast and Slow Processes of Sensorimotor Learning.

Authors:  Samuel D McDougle; Krista M Bond; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Cerebellar direct current stimulation enhances on-line motor skill acquisition through an effect on accuracy.

Authors:  Gabriela Cantarero; Danny Spampinato; Janine Reis; Loni Ajagbe; Tziporah Thompson; Kopal Kulkarni; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Right prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation enhances multi-day savings in sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Rachael D Seidler; Brittany S Gluskin; Brian Greeley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Using gaze behavior to parcellate the explicit and implicit contributions to visuomotor learning.

Authors:  Anouk J de Brouwer; Mohammed Albaghdadi; J Randall Flanagan; Jason P Gallivan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  A locomotor learning paradigm using distorted visual feedback elicits strategic learning.

Authors:  Margaret A French; Susanne M Morton; Charalambos C Charalambous; Darcy S Reisman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Corticospinal correlates of fast and slow adaptive processes in motor learning.

Authors:  Adjmal M E Sarwary; Miles Wischnewski; Dennis J L G Schutter; Luc P J Selen; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Decomposition of a sensory prediction error signal for visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Peter A Butcher; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The effect of morphine upon DNA methylation in ten regions of the rat brain.

Authors:  Timothy M Barrow; Hyang-Min Byun; Xinyan Li; Chris Smart; Yong-Xiang Wang; Yacong Zhang; Andrea A Baccarelli; Liqiong Guo
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 4.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.