Literature DB >> 25698763

Cerebellar direct current stimulation enhances on-line motor skill acquisition through an effect on accuracy.

Gabriela Cantarero1, Danny Spampinato1, Janine Reis2, Loni Ajagbe1, Tziporah Thompson1, Kopal Kulkarni1, Pablo Celnik3.   

Abstract

The cerebellum is involved in the update of motor commands during error-dependent learning. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a form of noninvasive brain stimulation, has been shown to increase cerebellar excitability and improve learning in motor adaptation tasks. Although cerebellar involvement has been clearly demonstrated in adaptation paradigms, a type of task that heavily relies on error-dependent motor learning mechanisms, its role during motor skill learning, a behavior that likely involves error-dependent as well as reinforcement and strategic mechanisms, is not completely understood. Here, in humans, we delivered cerebellar tDCS to modulate its activity during novel motor skill training over the course of 3 d and assessed gains during training (on-line effects), between days (off-line effects), and overall improvement. We found that excitatory anodal tDCS applied over the cerebellum increased skill learning relative to sham and cathodal tDCS specifically by increasing on-line rather than off-line learning. Moreover, the larger skill improvement in the anodal group was predominantly mediated by reductions in error rate rather than changes in movement time. These results have important implications for using cerebellar tDCS as an intervention to speed up motor skill acquisition and to improve motor skill accuracy, as well as to further our understanding of cerebellar function.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/353285-06$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cerebellum; skill learning; tDCS

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25698763      PMCID: PMC4331640          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2885-14.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  46 in total

1.  Disruption of primary motor cortex before learning impairs memory of movement dynamics.

Authors:  Andrew G Richardson; Simon A Overduin; Antoni Valero-Cabré; Camillo Padoa-Schioppa; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Emilio Bizzi; Daniel Z Press
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Brain polarization enhances the formation and retention of motor memories.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation.

Authors:  Janine Reis; Heidi M Schambra; Leonardo G Cohen; Ethan R Buch; Brita Fritsch; Eric Zarahn; Pablo A Celnik; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Intact ability to learn internal models of arm dynamics in Huntington's disease but not cerebellar degeneration.

Authors:  Maurice A Smith; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-12-29       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability.

Authors:  David Liebetanz; Michael A Nitsche; Frithjof Tergau; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 6.  Understanding sensorimotor adaptation and learning for rehabilitation.

Authors:  Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.710

7.  Differential modulation of motor cortical plasticity and excitability in early and late phases of human motor learning.

Authors:  Karin Rosenkranz; Aleksandra Kacar; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Impairment of retention but not acquisition of a visuomotor skill through time-dependent disruption of primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Arash Hadipour-Niktarash; Christine K Lee; John E Desmond; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Polarity-sensitive modulation of cortical neurotransmitters by transcranial stimulation.

Authors:  Charlotte J Stagg; Jonathan G Best; Mary C Stephenson; Jacinta O'Shea; Marzena Wylezinska; Z Tamas Kincses; Peter G Morris; Paul M Matthews; Heidi Johansen-Berg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Neural correlates of reach errors.

Authors:  Jörn Diedrichsen; Yasmin Hashambhoy; Tushar Rane; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 6.709

View more
  49 in total

1.  Taking the brakes off the learning curve.

Authors:  Freja Gheysen; Gabriel Lasne; Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac; Genevieve Albouy; Sabine Meunier; Habib Benali; Julien Doyon; Traian Popa
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The impact of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on learning fine-motor sequences.

Authors:  Renee E Shimizu; Allan D Wu; Jasmine K Samra; Barbara J Knowlton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Targeting the Cerebellum by Noninvasive Neurostimulation: a Review.

Authors:  Kim van Dun; Florian Bodranghien; Mario Manto; Peter Mariën
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Response variability of different anodal transcranial direct current stimulation intensities across multiple sessions.

Authors:  Claudia Ammann; Martin A Lindquist; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Modulation of cerebellar brain inhibition during temporal adaptive learning in a coincident timing task.

Authors:  Shin-Ya Tanaka; Masato Hirano; Kozo Funase
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Cerebellar-Motor Cortex Connectivity: One or Two Different Networks?

Authors:  Danny A Spampinato; Pablo A Celnik; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  A narrative review on non-invasive stimulation of the cerebellum in neurological diseases.

Authors:  Luana Billeri; Antonino Naro
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 8.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools.

Authors:  A J Woods; A Antal; M Bikson; P S Boggio; A R Brunoni; P Celnik; L G Cohen; F Fregni; C S Herrmann; E S Kappenman; H Knotkova; D Liebetanz; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; W Paulus; A Priori; D Reato; C Stagg; N Wenderoth; M A Nitsche
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 9.  Non-invasive Cerebellar Stimulation: a Promising Approach for Stroke Recovery?

Authors:  Maximilian J Wessel; Friedhelm C Hummel
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.847

10.  The Polarity-Specific Nature of Single-Session High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to the Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex on Motor and Non-motor Task Performance.

Authors:  Ted Maldonado; Jessica A Bernard
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.