Literature DB >> 18241844

The contribution of visual feedback to visuomotor adaptation: how much and when?

Mark R Hinder1, James R Tresilian, Stephan Riek, Richard G Carson.   

Abstract

We investigated the role of visual feedback in adapting to novel visuomotor environments. Participants produced isometric elbow torques to move a cursor towards visual targets. Following trials with no rotation, participants adapted to a 60 degrees rotation of the visual feedback before returning to the non-rotated condition. Participants received continuous visual feedback (CF) of cursor position during task execution or post-trial visual feedback (PF). With training, reductions of the angular deviations of the cursor path occurred to a similar extent and at a similar rate for CF and PF groups. However, upon re-exposure to the non-rotated environment only CF participants exhibited post-training aftereffects, manifested as increased angular deviation of the cursor path, with respect to the pre-rotation trials. These aftereffects occurred despite colour cues permitting identification of the change in environment. The results show that concurrent feedback permits automatic recalibration of the visuomotor mapping while post-trial feedback permits performance improvement via a cognitive strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18241844     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.12.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  37 in total

1.  Changes in muscle directional tuning parallel feedforward adaptation to a visuomotor rotation.

Authors:  Aymar de Rugy; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Enhanced mechanical transparency during practice impedes open-loop control of a complex tool.

Authors:  Sandra Sülzenbrück; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  To transfer or not to transfer? Kinematics and laterality quotient predict interlimb transfer of motor learning.

Authors:  Hannah Z Lefumat; Jean-Louis Vercher; R Chris Miall; Jonathan Cole; Frank Buloup; Lionel Bringoux; Christophe Bourdin; Fabrice R Sarlegna
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The efficacy of colour cues in facilitating adaptation to opposing visuomotor rotations.

Authors:  Mark R Hinder; Daniel G Woolley; James R Tresilian; Stephan Riek; Richard G Carson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Visuo-motor gain adaptation and generalization following left hemisphere stroke.

Authors:  Richard Palluel-Germain; Steven A Jax; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Differential plasticity of extensor and flexor motor cortex representations following visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  L Quinn; A Miljevic; B K Rurak; W Marinovic; Ann-Maree Vallence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: a review.

Authors:  Roland Sigrist; Georg Rauter; Robert Riener; Peter Wolf
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

8.  Feedback-dependent generalization.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; Laura L Hieber; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Real-time error detection but not error correction drives automatic visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Mark R Hinder; Stephan Riek; James R Tresilian; Aymar de Rugy; Richard G Carson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  On-line corrections for visuomotor errors.

Authors:  Britne A Shabbott; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.