Literature DB >> 30133377

Corticospinal correlates of fast and slow adaptive processes in motor learning.

Adjmal M E Sarwary1, Miles Wischnewski1, Dennis J L G Schutter1, Luc P J Selen1, W Pieter Medendorp1.   

Abstract

Recent computational theories and behavioral observations suggest that motor learning is supported by multiple adaptation processes, operating on different timescales, but direct neural evidence is lacking. We tested this hypothesis by applying transcranial magnetic stimulation over motor cortex in 16 human subjects during a validated reach adaptation task. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and cortical silent periods (CSPs) were recorded from the biceps brachii to assess modulations of corticospinal excitability as indices for corticospinal plasticity. Guided by a two-state adaptation model, we show that the MEP reflects an adaptive process that learns quickly but has poor retention, while the CSP correlates with a process that responds more slowly but retains information well. These results provide a physiological link between models of motor learning and distinct changes in corticospinal excitability. Our findings support the relationship between corticospinal gain modulations and the adaptive processes in motor learning. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Computational theories and behavioral observations suggest that motor learning is supported by multiple adaptation processes, but direct neural evidence is lacking. We tested this hypothesis by applying transcranial magnetic stimulation over human motor cortex during a reach adaptation task. Guided by a two-state adaptation model, we show that the motor-evoked potential reflects a process that adapts and decays quickly, whereas the cortical silent period reflects slow adaptation and decay.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CSP; MEP; adaptation; force field; state-space model

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30133377      PMCID: PMC6230793          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00488.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  58 in total

1.  A safety screening questionnaire for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  J C Keel; M J Smith; E M Wassermann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 2.  Modifying motor learning through gating and homeostatic metaplasticity.

Authors:  Ulf Ziemann; Hartwig R Siebner
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  A neural circuit model of flexible sensorimotor mapping: learning and forgetting on multiple timescales.

Authors:  Stefano Fusi; Wael F Asaad; Earl K Miller; Xiao-Jing Wang
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a primer.

Authors:  Mark Hallett
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Long-term retention explained by a model of short-term learning in the adaptive control of reaching.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Reduction in learning rates associated with anterograde interference results from interactions between different timescales in motor adaptation.

Authors:  Gary C Sing; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Automated-parameterization of the motor evoked potential and cortical silent period induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Christopher A Rábago; Jack L Lancaster; Shalini Narayana; Wei Zhang; Peter T Fox
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 8.  Errorless learning of everyday tasks in people with dementia.

Authors:  Maartje M E de Werd; Daniëlle Boelen; Marcel G M Olde Rikkert; Roy P C Kessels
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 4.458

9.  Dorsal premotor cortex exerts state-dependent causal influences on activity in contralateral primary motor and dorsal premotor cortex.

Authors:  Sven Bestmann; Orlando Swayne; Felix Blankenburg; Christian C Ruff; Patrick Haggard; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Oliver Josephs; Jon Driver; John C Rothwell; Nick S Ward
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Neural Substrates Related to Motor Memory with Multiple Timescales in Sensorimotor Adaptation.

Authors:  Sungshin Kim; Kenji Ogawa; Jinchi Lv; Nicolas Schweighofer; Hiroshi Imamizu
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  5 in total

1.  Time course of changes in the long-latency feedback response parallels the fast process of short-term motor adaptation.

Authors:  Susan K Coltman; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Population coding in the cerebellum: a machine learning perspective.

Authors:  Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Random Practice Enhances Retention and Spatial Transfer in Force Field Adaptation.

Authors:  Michael Herzog; Anne Focke; Philipp Maurus; Benjamin Thürer; Thorsten Stein
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.473

4.  Single versus dual-rate learning when exposed to Coriolis forces during reaching movements.

Authors:  Judith L Rudolph; Janny C Stapel; Luc P J Selen; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Adaptive control of movement deceleration during saccades.

Authors:  Simon P Orozco; Scott T Albert; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 4.779

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.