Literature DB >> 28504523

Decomposition of a sensory prediction error signal for visuomotor adaptation.

Peter A Butcher1, Jordan A Taylor1.   

Abstract

To accomplish effective motor control, the brain contains an internal forward model that predicts the expected sensory consequence of a motor command. When this prediction is inaccurate, a sensory prediction error is produced which adapts the forward model to make more accurate predictions of future movements. Other types of errors, such as task performance errors or reward, play less of a role in adapting a forward model. This raises the following question: What unique information is conveyed by the sensory prediction error that results in forward model adaptation? sensory prediction errors typically contain both the magnitude and direction of the error, but it is unclear if both components are necessary for adaptation or a single component is sufficient. In this article, we address this by having participants learn to counter a visuomotor rotation, which induces an angular mismatch between movements of the hand and visual feedback. We manipulated the information content of the visual feedback, in the form of a line, which accurately represented only the magnitude (distance), direction, or both magnitude and direction, of the virtual cursor relative to the target. We demonstrate that sensorimotor adaptation does not occur, or is minimal, when feedback is limited to information about the magnitude of an error. In contrast, sensorimotor adaptation is present when feedback is limited only to the direction of an error or when it contains combined direction and magnitude information. This result stands in contrast to current computational models of cerebellar-based sensorimotor adaptation that use error magnitude to drive adaptation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28504523      PMCID: PMC5685953          DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  54 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  The cerebellum coordinates eye and hand tracking movements.

Authors:  R C Miall; G Z Reckess; H Imamizu
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; M Kawato
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  1998-10

4.  Knowledge of performance is insufficient for implicit visuomotor rotation adaptation.

Authors:  Assaf Peled; Amir Karniel
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Characteristics of Implicit Sensorimotor Adaptation Revealed by Task-irrelevant Clamped Feedback.

Authors:  J Ryan Morehead; Jordan A Taylor; Darius E Parvin; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Reward feedback accelerates motor learning.

Authors:  Ali A Nikooyan; Alaa A Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Throwing while looking through prisms. I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation.

Authors:  T A Martin; J G Keating; H P Goodkin; A J Bastian; W T Thach
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Complex spike activity of purkinje cells in the oculomotor vermis during behavioral adaptation of monkey saccades.

Authors:  Robijanto Soetedjo; Albert F Fuchs
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-07-19       Impact factor: 6.709

10.  Flexible cognitive strategies during motor learning.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  5 in total

1.  Relative sensitivity of explicit reaiming and implicit motor adaptation.

Authors:  Sarah A Hutter; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Early stages of sensorimotor map acquisition: learning with free exploration, without active movement or global structure.

Authors:  F T van Vugt; D J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Implicit adaptation to mirror reversal is in the correct coordinate system but the wrong direction.

Authors:  Tianhe Wang; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Motor learning without movement.

Authors:  Olivia A Kim; Alexander D Forrence; Samuel D McDougle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Increased cognitive load in immersive virtual reality during visuomotor adaptation is associated with decreased long-term retention and context transfer.

Authors:  Julia M Juliano; Nicolas Schweighofer; Sook-Lei Liew
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 5.208

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.