Literature DB >> 26912598

Blocking trial-by-trial error correction does not interfere with motor learning in human walking.

Andrew W Long1, Ryan T Roemmich2, Amy J Bastian3.   

Abstract

Movements can be learned implicitly in response to new environmental demands or explicitly through instruction and strategy. The former is often studied in an environment that perturbs movement so that people learn to correct the errors and store a new motor pattern. Here, we demonstrate in human walking that implicit learning of foot placement occurs even when an explicit strategy is used to block changes in foot placement during the learning process. We studied people learning a new walking pattern on a split-belt treadmill with and without an explicit strategy through instruction on where to step. When there is no instruction, subjects implicitly learn to place one foot in front of the other to minimize step-length asymmetry during split-belt walking, and the learned pattern is maintained when the belts are returned to the same speed, i.e., postlearning. When instruction is provided, we block expression of the new foot-placement pattern that would otherwise naturally develop from adaptation. Despite this appearance of no learning in foot placement, subjects show similar postlearning effects as those who were not given any instruction. Thus locomotor adaptation is not dependent on a change in action during learning but instead can be driven entirely by an unexpressed internal recalibration of the desired movement.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; feedback; gait; motor learning; walking

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26912598      PMCID: PMC4922458          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00941.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  37 in total

1.  Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: a review.

Authors:  G Wulf; W Prinz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

2.  The prefrontal cortex and conscious monitoring of action: an experimental study.

Authors:  A Slachevsky; B Pillon; P Fourneret; L Renié; R Levy; M Jeannerod; B Dubois
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Cerebellar contributions to locomotor adaptations during splitbelt treadmill walking.

Authors:  Susanne M Morton; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Persistence of motor memories reflects statistics of the learning event.

Authors:  Vincent S Huang; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  A marching-walking hybrid induces step length adaptation and transfers to natural walking.

Authors:  Andrew W Long; James M Finley; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Throwing while looking through prisms. I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation.

Authors:  T A Martin; J G Keating; H P Goodkin; A J Bastian; W T Thach
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Cerebellum activation associated with performance change but not motor learning.

Authors:  R D Seidler; A Purushotham; S-G Kim; K Uğurbil; D Willingham; J Ashe
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-06-14       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Flexible cognitive strategies during motor learning.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  19 in total

1.  Altering attention to split-belt walking increases the generalization of motor memories across walking contexts.

Authors:  Dulce M Mariscal; Pablo A Iturralde; Gelsy Torres-Oviedo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Use-dependent plasticity explains aftereffects in visually guided locomotor learning of a novel step length asymmetry.

Authors:  Jonathan M Wood; Hyosub E Kim; Margaret A French; Darcy S Reisman; Susanne M Morton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Using a Split-belt Treadmill to Evaluate Generalization of Human Locomotor Adaptation.

Authors:  Erin V L Vasudevan; Rami J Hamzey; Eileen M Kirk
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Seeing the Errors You Feel Enhances Locomotor Performance but Not Learning.

Authors:  Ryan T Roemmich; Andrew W Long; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Independent voluntary correction and savings in locomotor learning.

Authors:  Kristan A Leech; Ryan T Roemmich
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Using asymmetry to your advantage: learning to acquire and accept external assistance during prolonged split-belt walking.

Authors:  Natalia Sánchez; Surabhi N Simha; J Maxwell Donelan; James M Finley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Continuous sweep versus discrete step protocols for studying effects of wearable robot assistance magnitude.

Authors:  Philippe Malcolm; Denise Martineli Rossi; Christopher Siviy; Sangjun Lee; Brendan Thomas Quinlivan; Martin Grimmer; Conor J Walsh
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Evidence of Energetic Optimization during Adaptation Differs for Metabolic, Mechanical, and Perceptual Estimates of Energetic Cost.

Authors:  Natalia Sánchez; Sungwoo Park; James M Finley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Use of explicit processes during a visually guided locomotor learning task predicts 24-h retention after stroke.

Authors:  Margaret A French; Susanne M Morton; Darcy S Reisman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Multi-Trial Gait Adaptation of Healthy Individuals during Visual Kinematic Perturbations.

Authors:  Trieu Phat Luu; Yongtian He; Sho Nakagome; Kevin Nathan; Samuel Brown; Jeffrey Gorges; Jose L Contreras-Vidal
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.