PURPOSE: Finding the anatomical landmarks used for correct femoral axial alignment can be difficult. The posterior condylar line (PCL) is probably the easiest to find during surgery. The aim of this study was to analyse whether a predetermined fixed angle referencing of the PCL could help find the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) and this based on a large CT database with enough Caucasian diversity to be representable. METHODS: A total of 2,637 CT scans and 3D reconstructions from patients on four continents, executed for preoperative planning and creation of patient-specific instrumentation, were used to perform anthropometric measurements and to measure the posterior condylar angle (PCA) between the surgical epicondylar angle and the PCL. RESULTS: The mean (SD) PCA was 4° (1.4°) of external rotation. A significant correlation was found between more external rotation of the SEA and more proximal varus of the tibia or more distal valgus of the femur. For 59% of the study population, 4° external rotation from the PCL would be the right amount of axial rotation to align the femoral component in line with the SEA. Nine per cent needs less, and 32% needs more than 4° of axial rotation. On 105 (4%) CT-based 3D models, external rotation between 7° and 11° was measured and 77 (73%) of those cases were in varus or neutral alignment. In 132 patients, bilateral measurements were available and 94 (71%) had rotation within 1° of the opposite side. This last finding underlines that there is even an intra-individual difference in distal femoral anatomy that can range from 1° to 5°. CONCLUSIONS: This study was performed on a very large anthropometric CT and 3D models database and showed that there is a 41% risk of malalignment if a fixed PCA referenced of the PCL is used in total knee arthroplasty. The clinical importance of this study is the observation that femoral axial anatomy is individual and also that it is determined by the tibial anatomy. A group of patients needs more than the average external rotation because they have more distal femoral valgus with dysplastic condyles or more proximal tibial varus with a bigger medial condyle. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
PURPOSE: Finding the anatomical landmarks used for correct femoral axial alignment can be difficult. The posterior condylar line (PCL) is probably the easiest to find during surgery. The aim of this study was to analyse whether a predetermined fixed angle referencing of the PCL could help find the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) and this based on a large CT database with enough Caucasian diversity to be representable. METHODS: A total of 2,637 CT scans and 3D reconstructions from patients on four continents, executed for preoperative planning and creation of patient-specific instrumentation, were used to perform anthropometric measurements and to measure the posterior condylar angle (PCA) between the surgical epicondylar angle and the PCL. RESULTS: The mean (SD) PCA was 4° (1.4°) of external rotation. A significant correlation was found between more external rotation of the SEA and more proximal varus of the tibia or more distal valgus of the femur. For 59% of the study population, 4° external rotation from the PCL would be the right amount of axial rotation to align the femoral component in line with the SEA. Nine per cent needs less, and 32% needs more than 4° of axial rotation. On 105 (4%) CT-based 3D models, external rotation between 7° and 11° was measured and 77 (73%) of those cases were in varus or neutral alignment. In 132 patients, bilateral measurements were available and 94 (71%) had rotation within 1° of the opposite side. This last finding underlines that there is even an intra-individual difference in distal femoral anatomy that can range from 1° to 5°. CONCLUSIONS: This study was performed on a very large anthropometric CT and 3D models database and showed that there is a 41% risk of malalignment if a fixed PCA referenced of the PCL is used in total knee arthroplasty. The clinical importance of this study is the observation that femoral axial anatomy is individual and also that it is determined by the tibial anatomy. A group of patients needs more than the average external rotation because they have more distal femoral valgus with dysplastic condyles or more proximal tibial varus with a bigger medial condyle. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Authors: Robert A Siston; Jay J Patel; Stuart B Goodman; Scott L Delp; Nicholas J Giori Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Ryan M Nunley; Bradley S Ellison; Jinjun Zhu; Erin L Ruh; Stephen M Howell; Robert L Barrack Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2011-12-20 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Vincent Y Ng; Jeffrey H DeClaire; Keith R Berend; Bethany C Gulick; Adolph V Lombardi Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Samantha J Wright; Tim A E J Boymans; Bernd Grimm; Anthony W Miles; Oliver Kessler Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2014-10-02 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Lukas B Moser; Silvan Hess; Felix Amsler; Henrik Behrend; Michael T Hirschmann Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2019-03-08 Impact factor: 4.342