Literature DB >> 30848310

Native non-osteoarthritic knees have a highly variable coronal alignment: a systematic review.

Lukas B Moser1,2, Silvan Hess3,4, Felix Amsler5, Henrik Behrend6, Michael T Hirschmann3,7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Coronal alignment of the knee is defined by the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), the femoral mechanical angle (FMA), the tibial mechanical angle (TMA), and the joint line convergence angle (JLCA). To date, there is still a lack of knowledge about the variability of native coronal knee alignment. The purpose of this paper is to present a systematic review of the current literature about the variability of coronal knee alignment (HKA, FMA, TMA, and JLCA) in non-osteoarthritic knees.
METHODS: The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched from database inception to search date (November 1, 2018) and screened for relevant studies. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. Inclusion criteria were studies that reported the coronal alignment of the native, non-osteoarthritic knee.
RESULTS: A total of 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. Thirteen studies performed the measurements on weight-bearing long-leg standing radiographs (LLR), one study used MRI, and one study used the EOS imaging system. The mean HKA ranged from 176.7° ± 2.8° (male) to 180.7° (female). The mean FMA ranged from 92.08° ± 1.78° (female) to 97.2° ± 2.7° (female). The mean TMA ranged from 84.6° ± 2.5° (female) to 89.6° (female). The mean JLCA ranged from - 0.47° ± 0.98° (male) to - 1.9° ± 1.4° (female).
CONCLUSION: This systematic review provides a detailed overview about the variability of the coronal knee alignment in non-osteoarthritic knees. The broad variability of all coronal alignment parameters highlights the necessity for a more anatomic and individualized approach in knee arthroplasty. It also offers the fundament to understand the changes in osteoarthritic knees. LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE: Systematic review, Level IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alignment; Anatomy; Femoral mechanical angle; Functional knee phenotypes; Hip knee ankle angle; Knee; Osteoarthritis; Tibial mechanical angle

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30848310     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05417-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  30 in total

1.  Axial alignment of the lower extremity in Chinese adults.

Authors:  W M Tang; Y H Zhu; K Y Chiu
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Factors contributing to inherent varus alignment of lower limb in normal Asian adults: role of tibial plateau inclination.

Authors:  Gautam M Shetty; Arun Mullaji; Sagar Bhayde; Kyung Wook Nha; Hyoung Keun Oh
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  The position and orientation of total knee replacement components: a comparison of conventional radiographs, transverse 2D-CT slices and 3D-CT reconstruction.

Authors:  M T Hirschmann; P Konala; F Amsler; F Iranpour; N F Friederich; J P Cobb
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-05

4.  Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load-bearing distribution at the knee.

Authors:  R W Hsu; S Himeno; M B Coventry; E Y Chao
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Lower-limb alignment and posterior tibial slope in Pakistanis: a radiographic study.

Authors:  Mujahid Jamil Khattak; Masood Umer; Edward T Davis; Munira Habib; Mehmood Ahmed
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.118

6.  The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus.

Authors:  Johan Bellemans; William Colyn; Hilde Vandenneucker; Jan Victor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Geometrical values of the normal and arthritic hip and knee detected with the EOS imaging system.

Authors:  Peter Than; Kinga Szuper; Szabolcs Somoskeöy; Vilmos Warta; Tamás Illés
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  A comparison of coronal plane axial femoral relationships in Asian patients with varus osteoarthritic knees and healthy knees.

Authors:  Arun B Mullaji; Satyajit V Marawar; Vivek Mittal
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Anatomic variations between Japanese and Caucasian populations in the healthy young adult knee joint.

Authors:  Kristen R Hovinga; Amy L Lerner
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Coronal alignment is a predictor of the rotational geometry of the distal femur in the osteo-arthritic knee.

Authors:  T Luyckx; F Zambianchi; F Catani; J Bellemans; J Victor
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-11-25       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  19 in total

1.  Alignment in TKA: what has been clear is not anymore!

Authors:  Michael T Hirschmann; Roland Becker; Reha Tandogan; Pascal-André Vendittoli; Stephen Howell
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Personalised medicine in knee arthroplasty: we need more science!

Authors:  Michael T Hirschmann; Niklaus F Friederich; Roland Becker; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Kinematically aligned TKA restores physiological patellofemoral biomechanics in the sagittal plane during a deep knee bend.

Authors:  Stephanie Nicolet-Petersen; Augustine Saiz; Trevor Shelton; Stephen Howell; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Lower Limb Alignment in Indian Children: A Radiographic Analysis of Coronal Plane Parameters.

Authors:  Ashish S Ranade; Gauri A Oka; Gaurav Ardawatia; Nishant Goyal
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  A single type of varus knee does not exist: morphotyping and gap analysis in varus OA.

Authors:  Heiko Graichen; Kreangsak Lekkreusuwan; Kim Eller; Thomas Grau; Michael T Hirschmann; Wolfgang Scior
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 4.114

6.  Tibial joint line orientation has no effect on joint awareness after mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anna-Katharina Calek; Andreas Ladurner; Lukas Jud; Vilijam Zdravkovic; Henrik Behrend
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 4.114

7.  Total knee arthroplasty in Ranawat II valgus deformity with enlarged femoral valgus cut angle: A new technique to achieve balanced gap.

Authors:  Shuai-Jie Lv; Xiao-Jian Wang; Jie-Feng Huang; Qiang Mao; Bang-Jian He; Pei-Jian Tong
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 1.534

8.  Relevant changes of leg alignment after customised individually made bicompartmental knee arthroplasty due to overstuffing.

Authors:  Sonia Shamdasani; Nicole Vogel; Raphael Kaelin; Achim Kaim; Markus P Arnold
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 4.114

9.  Patients with varus knee osteoarthritis undergoing high tibial osteotomy exhibit more femoral varus but similar tibial morphology compared to non-arthritic varus knees.

Authors:  Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak; Grégoire Micicoi; Raghbir S Khakha; Matthieu Ehlinger; Ahmad Faizan; Sally LiArno; Matthieu Ollivier
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 4.114

10.  Small medial femoral condyle morphotype is associated with medial compartment degeneration and distinct morphological characteristics: a comparative pilot study.

Authors:  Jonas Grammens; Annemieke Van Haver; Femke Danckaers; Brian Booth; Jan Sijbers; Peter Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.