Roland Becker1, Katharina Bäker2, Hagen Hommel3, Manfred Bernard4, Sebastian Kopf5. 1. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Brandenburg Medical Scholl Theodor Fontane, Hochstrasse 26, 14770, Brandenburg, Germany. roland_becker@yahoo.de. 2. Department of Traumatolgy, Helios Hospital, August-Bebel-Straße 55A, 39288, Burg bei Magdeburg, Germany. 3. Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital-MOL GmBH, Sonnenburger Weg 3, 16269, Wriezen, Germany. 4. Hospital Sanssouci Potsdam, Helene-Lange-Straße 13, 14469, Potsdam, Germany. 5. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Brandenburg Medical Scholl Theodor Fontane, Hochstrasse 26, 14770, Brandenburg, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: It was hypothesized that malrotation of femoral component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) will significantly impact clinical outcome. METHODS: Eighty-eight consecutive patients with primary osteoarthritis of the knee were prospectively evaluated. They received a cemented posterior stabilized TKA (NexGen, Zimmer/Biomet® Inc., Warsaw, IN, USA). The femoral component was placed in 3° of external rotation referenced to the posterior condylar line. Postoperatively, a CT scan was performed to evaluate rotation of femoral component in the transverse plane. SF-36, KSS, and WOMAC, as well as their range of motion was assessed prior to surgery, after 6 and 24 months. Data are presented as mean and standard deviation (SD), as well as range if applicable. Correlation analysis was performed between the placement of the femoral component in the transverse plane and the clinical outcome. RESULTS: Femoral component placement was on average 0.1° [SD 2.5°, range - 6.5° to + 6.5°] referenced to the surgical transepicondylar line showing a wide range between the two landmarks after surgery. After 6 months, WOMAC category 'physical function' correlated significantly with femoral component rotation (r = - 0.28, p = 0.007). After 24 months, WOMAC categories 'physical function' and 'pain' correlated significantly with femoral rotation (r = - 0.41, p < 0.001; and r = - 0.33, p = 0.001). No significant correlations were found between femoral component rotation and range of motion (r = 0.04), WOMAC category "stiffness", KSS, as well as SF-36 questionnaires. These reported formally significant correlations were without any clinical relevance. DISCUSSION: The study showed that there is a significant patients specific femoral component placement in the transverse plane. Internal or external malrotation of the femoral component does not correlate automatically with poor knee function. The lack of correlation between femoral component position and clinical as well as functional outcome underlines complexity and significant individuality of each patient. The surgeon should be aware of the finding and attention should be paid during surgery when significant divergency is seen between the two landmarks. Soft tissue balancing might be very crucial in these specific patients, which needs to be studied in depth in the future. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
PURPOSE: It was hypothesized that malrotation of femoral component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) will significantly impact clinical outcome. METHODS: Eighty-eight consecutive patients with primary osteoarthritis of the knee were prospectively evaluated. They received a cemented posterior stabilized TKA (NexGen, Zimmer/Biomet® Inc., Warsaw, IN, USA). The femoral component was placed in 3° of external rotation referenced to the posterior condylar line. Postoperatively, a CT scan was performed to evaluate rotation of femoral component in the transverse plane. SF-36, KSS, and WOMAC, as well as their range of motion was assessed prior to surgery, after 6 and 24 months. Data are presented as mean and standard deviation (SD), as well as range if applicable. Correlation analysis was performed between the placement of the femoral component in the transverse plane and the clinical outcome. RESULTS: Femoral component placement was on average 0.1° [SD 2.5°, range - 6.5° to + 6.5°] referenced to the surgical transepicondylar line showing a wide range between the two landmarks after surgery. After 6 months, WOMAC category 'physical function' correlated significantly with femoral component rotation (r = - 0.28, p = 0.007). After 24 months, WOMAC categories 'physical function' and 'pain' correlated significantly with femoral rotation (r = - 0.41, p < 0.001; and r = - 0.33, p = 0.001). No significant correlations were found between femoral component rotation and range of motion (r = 0.04), WOMAC category "stiffness", KSS, as well as SF-36 questionnaires. These reported formally significant correlations were without any clinical relevance. DISCUSSION: The study showed that there is a significant patients specific femoral component placement in the transverse plane. Internal or external malrotation of the femoral component does not correlate automatically with poor knee function. The lack of correlation between femoral component position and clinical as well as functional outcome underlines complexity and significant individuality of each patient. The surgeon should be aware of the finding and attention should be paid during surgery when significant divergency is seen between the two landmarks. Soft tissue balancing might be very crucial in these specific patients, which needs to be studied in depth in the future. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
Entities:
Keywords:
Clinical outcome; Femoral component placement; Observational study; Rotation; TKA; Total knee arthroplasty; Total knee replacement
Authors: Bernd Stoeckl; Michael Nogler; Martin Krismer; Claudia Beimel; Jose-Luis Moctezuma de la Barrera; Oliver Kessler Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 4.757