Literature DB >> 24051507

The difference between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing alignment in patient-specific instrumentation planning.

Frederic Paternostre1, Pierre-Emmanuel Schwab, Emmanuel Thienpont.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Retrospective study to analyse the difference between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing alignment in osteoarthritic knees planned for patient-specific instrumented (PSI) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of the study is to observe whether a difference in alignment can be linked to arthritis staging or zone mechanical axis.
METHODS: Full-leg standing radiographs and non-weight-bearing MRI of the whole leg were compared for hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, measured according to Moreland criteria, in seventy osteoarthritic patients. Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) staging and classification according to zone mechanical axis with Kennedy zones was done.
RESULTS: A mean preoperative HKA angle on standing radiographs of 176.4° ± 7.2° was measured compared to 176.4° ± 6.9° for the MRI whole-leg HKA angle. A difference of 0°-1° was observed in 54% of patients when comparing the weight-bearing with the non-weight-bearing HKA angle. Twenty-three per cent had a difference of 2° and another 23 % a difference of 3° or more. In female patients, the dynamic load pattern of weight-bearing increases the HKA angle due to convex side soft tissue laxity both in varus and valgus knees. More important differences were observed in the KL stage 3 and 4 patients (P < 0.05) and with a load-bearing axis outside of the articular surface (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Surgeons should be aware that there is a difference between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing alignment in patients with Kellgren-Lawrence 3 and 4 with a load-bearing axis outside of the articular surface (Kennedy 0 or 1 or 5). According to this study, these changes seem related to the amount of articular wear and the load-bearing axis. This is important for the preoperative planning process in PSI-assisted TKA. More concave side ligamentous release or more constraint can be necessary than imagined based on the PSI alignment result. Full-leg standing radiographs should be performed for PSI-assisted TKAs to analyse the position of the load-bearing axis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24051507     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2687-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  36 in total

1.  The knee adduction moment during gait in subjects with knee osteoarthritis is more closely correlated with static alignment than radiographic disease severity, toe out angle and pain.

Authors:  D E Hurwitz; A B Ryals; J P Case; J A Block; T P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  No difference between tibia-first and femur-first techniques in TKA using computer-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Roland Becker; Markus Malzdorf; Christian Stärke; Pirtkien Randolf; Christoph Lohmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The role of knee alignment in disease progression and functional decline in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  L Sharma; J Song; D T Felson; S Cahue; E Shamiyeh; D D Dunlop
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-07-11       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Effective measurement of knee alignment using AP knee radiographs.

Authors:  Alexandra N Colebatch; Deborah J Hart; Guangju Zhai; F M Williams; Tim D Spector; Nigel K Arden
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2008-09-14       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Lower limb alignment and foot angle are related to stance phase knee adduction in normal subjects: a critical analysis of the reliability of gait analysis data.

Authors:  M Andrews; F R Noyes; T E Hewett; T P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Thrust during ambulation and the progression of knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Alison Chang; Karen Hayes; Dorothy Dunlop; Debra Hurwitz; Jing Song; September Cahue; Ronuk Genge; Leena Sharma
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2004-12

8.  Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity.

Authors:  J R Moreland; L W Bassett; G J Hanker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus.

Authors:  Johan Bellemans; William Colyn; Hilde Vandenneucker; Jan Victor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Test-retest reliability of the peak knee adduction moment during walking in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Trevor B Birmingham; Michael A Hunt; Ian C Jones; Thomas R Jenkyn; J Robert Giffin
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2007-08-15
View more
  15 in total

1.  No condylar lift-off occurs because of excessive lateral soft tissue laxity in neutrally aligned total knee arthroplasty: a computer simulation study.

Authors:  Shinichi Kuriyama; Masahiro Ishikawa; Shinichiro Nakamura; Moritoshi Furu; Hiromu Ito; Shuichi Matsuda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Varus femoral and tibial coronal alignments result in different kinematics and kinetics after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mutsumi Watanabe; Shinichi Kuriyama; Shinichiro Nakamura; Yoshihisa Tanaka; Kohei Nishitani; Moritoshi Furu; Hiromu Ito; Shuichi Matsuda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Does Medial Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis Influence Outcome Scores and Risk of Revision After Fixed-bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Y Berger; S Ftaita; E Thienpont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Effects of total knee arthroplasty on ankle alignment in patients with varus gonarthrosis: Do we sacrifice ankle to the knee?

Authors:  Sarper Gursu; Hakan Sofu; Peter Verdonk; Vedat Sahin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Total knee arthroplasty for valgus osteoarthritis: the results of a standardized soft-tissue release technique.

Authors:  Friedrich Boettner; Lisa Renner; Danik Arana Narbarte; Claus Egidy; Martin Faschingbauer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Rotational alignment of the distal femur: anthropometric measurements with CT-based patient-specific instruments planning show high variability of the posterior condylar angle.

Authors:  Emmanuel Thienpont; Pierre-Emmanuel Schwab; Frederic Paternostre; Peter Koch
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  The relationship between constitutional alignment and varus osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Pieter-Jan T K Vandekerckhove; Nicholas Matlovich; Matthew G Teeter; Steven J MacDonald; James L Howard; Brent A Lanting
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: simpler, faster and more accurate than standard instrumentation-a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  João Vide; Tânia Pinto Freitas; Acácio Ramos; Henrique Cruz; João Paulo Sousa
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  The impact of limb loading and the measurement modality (2D versus 3D) on the measurement of the limb loading dependent lower extremity parameters.

Authors:  Lukas Jud; Tabitha Roth; Philipp Fürnstahl; Lazaros Vlachopoulos; Reto Sutter; Sandro F Fucentese
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Measurement of lower limb alignment: there are within-person differences between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing measurement modalities.

Authors:  Daphne A L Schoenmakers; Peter Z Feczko; Bert Boonen; Martijn G M Schotanus; Nanne P Kort; Pieter J Emans
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.