Literature DB >> 23184086

Coronal alignment is a predictor of the rotational geometry of the distal femur in the osteo-arthritic knee.

T Luyckx1, F Zambianchi, F Catani, J Bellemans, J Victor.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is a lot of inter-individual variation in the rotational anatomy of the distal femur. This study was set up to define the rotational anatomy of the distal femur in the osteo-arthritic knee and to investigate its relationship with the overall coronal alignment and gender.
METHODS: CT-scans of 231 patients with end-stage knee osteo-arthritis prior to TKA surgery were obtained. This represents the biggest series published on rational geometry of the distal femur in literature so far.
RESULTS: The posterior condylar line (PCL) was on average 1.6° (SD 1.9) internally rotated relative to the surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA). The perpendicular to trochlear anteroposterior axis (⊥TRAx) was on average 4.8° (SD 3.3°) externally rotated relative to the sTEA. The relationship between the PCL and the sTEA was statistically different in the different coronal alignment groups (p < 0.001): 1.0° (SD 1.8°) in varus knees, 2.1° (SD 1.8°) in neutral knees and 2.6° (SD 1.8°) in valgus knees. The same was true for the ⊥TRAx in these 3 groups (p < 0.02).There was a clear linear relationship between the overall coronal alignment and the rotational geometry of the distal femur. For every 1° in coronal alignment increment from varus to valgus, there is a 0.1° increment in posterior condylar angle (PCL vs sTEA).
CONCLUSION: The PCL was on average 1.6° internally rotated relative to the sTEA in the osteo-arthritic knee. The relationship between the PCL and the sTEA was statistically different in the different coronal alignment groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23184086     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2306-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  28 in total

1.  Rotational malalignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  T K Fehring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Low reproducibility of the intra-operative measurement of the transepicondylar axis during total knee replacement.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Jenny; Cyril Boeri
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2004-02

3.  Comparison of the tibiofemoral rotational alignment after mobile and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dongwook Kim; Sang Cheol Seong; Myung Chul Lee; Sahnghoon Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Rotational position of femoral and tibial components in TKA using the femoral transepicondylar axis.

Authors:  Paolo Aglietti; Lorenzo Sensi; Pierluigi Cuomo; Antonio Ciardullo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Measured resection: an outdated technique in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Douglas A Dennis
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.390

Review 6.  Rotational alignment of the distal femur: a literature review.

Authors:  J Victor
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 2.256

7.  Effect of rotational alignment on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M Akagi; Y Matsusue; T Mata; Y Asada; M Horiguchi; H Iida; T Nakamura
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Computed tomography measurement of the surgical and clinical transepicondylar axis of the distal femur in osteoarthritic knees.

Authors:  N Yoshino; S Takai; Y Ohtsuki; Y Hirasawa
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  The anatomy and functional axes of the femur.

Authors:  Y Yoshioka; D Siu; T D Cooke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Is adapted measured resection superior to gap-balancing in determining femoral component rotation in total knee replacement?

Authors:  T Luyckx; T Peeters; H Vandenneucker; J Victor; J Bellemans
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-09
View more
  13 in total

1.  Preoperative assessment of femoral rotation and its relationship with coronal alignment: A magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Catherine J McDougall; Price Gallie; Sarah L Whitehouse
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-06-29

2.  The surgical epicondylar axis is a consistent reference of the distal femur in the coronal and axial planes.

Authors:  Hideo Kobayashi; Yasushi Akamatsu; Ken Kumagai; Yoshihiro Kusayama; Ryo Ishigatsubo; Shuntaro Muramatsu; Tomoyuki Saito
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-02       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The shape and orientation of the trochlea run more parallel to the posterior condylar line than generally believed.

Authors:  C Vercruysse; H Vandenneucker; J Bellemans; L Scheys; T Luyckx
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The combined Whiteside's and posterior condylar line as a reliable reference to describe axial distal femoral anatomy in patient-specific instrument planning.

Authors:  Frederic Paternostre; Pierre-Emmanuel Schwab; Emmanuel Thienpont
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Native non-osteoarthritic knees have a highly variable coronal alignment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lukas B Moser; Silvan Hess; Felix Amsler; Henrik Behrend; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  How to improve femoral component rotational alignment in computer-assisted TKA.

Authors:  F Zambianchi; T Luyckx; J Victor; V Digennaro; A Giorgini; F Catani
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Rotational alignment of the distal femur: anthropometric measurements with CT-based patient-specific instruments planning show high variability of the posterior condylar angle.

Authors:  Emmanuel Thienpont; Pierre-Emmanuel Schwab; Frederic Paternostre; Peter Koch
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  The relationship between constitutional alignment and varus osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Pieter-Jan T K Vandekerckhove; Nicholas Matlovich; Matthew G Teeter; Steven J MacDonald; James L Howard; Brent A Lanting
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  A morphometric study of normal and varus knees.

Authors:  Pramod Kumar Puthumanapully; Simon J Harris; Anthony Leong; Justin P Cobb; Andrew A Amis; Jonathan Jeffers
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Referencing the sulcus line of the trochlear groove and removing intraoperative parallax errors improve femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Simon Talbot; Pandelis Dimitriou; Michael Mullen; John Bartlett
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.