Literature DB >> 24880960

Spatial resolution measurement for iterative reconstruction by use of image-averaging techniques in computed tomography.

Atsushi Urikura1, Katsuhiro Ichikawa, Takanori Hara, Eiji Nishimaru, Yoshihiro Nakaya.   

Abstract

The purpose of our study was to investigate the validity of a spatial resolution measuring method that uses a combination of a bar-pattern phantom and an image-averaging technique, and to evaluate the spatial resolution property of iterative reconstruction (IR) images with middle-contrast (50 HU) objects. We used computed tomography (CT) images of the bar-pattern phantom reconstructed by the IR technology Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D (AIDR 3D), which was installed in the multidetector CT system Aquilion ONE (Toshiba Medical Systems, Otawara, Japan). The contrast of the bar-pattern image was set to 50 HU, which is considered to be a middle contrast that requires higher spatial resolution clinically. We employed an image-averaging technique to eliminate the influence of image noise, and we obtained averaged images of the bar-pattern phantom with sufficiently low noise. Modulation transfer functions (MTFs) were measured from the images. The conventional wire method was also used for comparison; in this method, AIDR 3D showed MTF values equivalent to those of filtered back projection. For the middle-contrast condition, the results showed that the MTF of AIDR 3D decreased with the strength of IR processing. Further, the MTF of AIDR 3D decreased with dose reduction. The image-averaging technique used was effective for correct evaluation of the spatial resolution for middle-contrast objects in IR images. The results obtained by our method clarified that the resolution preservation of AIDR 3D was not sufficient for middle-contrast objects.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24880960     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-014-0273-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  26 in total

1.  Self-normalizing method to measure the detective quantum efficiency of a wide range of x-ray detectors.

Authors:  K Stierstorfer; M Spahn
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  New low-contrast resolution phantoms for computed tomography.

Authors:  C Suess; W A Kalender; J M Coman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography.

Authors:  H Fujita; D Y Tsai; T Itoh; K Doi; J Morishita; K Ueda; A Ohtsuka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 5.  History of cardiac computed tomography: single to 320-detector row multislice computed tomography.

Authors:  Gregory S Hurlock; Hiroshi Higashino; Teruhito Mochizuki
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Measurement of the PSF for a CT scanner: appropriate wire diameter and pixel size.

Authors:  E L Nickoloff
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Iterative reconstruction methods in two different MDCT scanners: physical metrics and 4-alternative forced-choice detectability experiments--a phantom approach.

Authors:  Frédéric A Miéville; François Gudinchet; Francis Brunelle; François O Bochud; Francis R Verdun
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2012-01-02       Impact factor: 2.685

8.  CT image quality improvement using Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction with wide-volume acquisition on 320-detector CT.

Authors:  Alban Gervaise; Benoît Osemont; Sophie Lecocq; Alain Noel; Emilien Micard; Jacques Felblinger; Alain Blum
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Modulation transfer function of the EMI CT head scanner.

Authors:  C J Bischof; J C Ehrhardt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1977 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.

Authors:  Sarabjeet Singh; Mannudeep K Kalra; Jiang Hsieh; Paul E Licato; Synho Do; Homer H Pien; Michael A Blake
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  5 in total

1.  Radiation dose optimization for the bolus tracking technique in abdominal computed tomography: usefulness of real-time iterative reconstruction for monitoring scan.

Authors:  Yuya Ishikawa; Atsushi Urikura; Tsukasa Yoshida; Keisuke Takiguchi; Yoshihiro Nakaya
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-09-30

2.  Quantitative measurements of emphysema in ultra-high resolution computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction in comparison to that using hybrid iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  Shun Muramatsu; Kazuhiro Sato; Tsuneo Yamashiro; Kunio Doi
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2022-01-13

3.  Performance of clinically available deep learning image reconstruction in computed tomography: a phantom study.

Authors:  Hiroki Kawashima; Katsuhiro Ichikawa; Tadanori Takata; Wataru Mitsui; Hiroshi Ueta; Norihide Yoneda; Satoshi Kobayashi
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-12-16

4.  Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of hybrid iterative reconstruction, with and without noise power spectrum models: A phantom study.

Authors:  Kazuya Minamishima; Koichi Sugisawa; Yoshitake Yamada; Masahiro Jinzaki
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  A pitfall of using the circular-edge technique with image averaging for spatial resolution measurement in iteratively reconstructed CT images.

Authors:  Akihiro Narita; Masaki Ohkubo
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.