Literature DB >> 35023075

Quantitative measurements of emphysema in ultra-high resolution computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction in comparison to that using hybrid iterative reconstruction.

Shun Muramatsu1, Kazuhiro Sato2, Tsuneo Yamashiro3, Kunio Doi4,5.   

Abstract

The percentage of low attenuation volume ratio (LAVR), which is measured using computed tomography (CT), is an index of the severity of emphysema. For LAVR evaluation, ultra-high-resolution (U-HR) CT images are useful. To improve the image quality of U-HRCT, iterative reconstruction is used. There are two types of iterative reconstruction: hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR). In this study, we physically and clinically evaluated U-HR images reconstructed with HIR and MBIR, and demonstrated the usefulness of U-HR images with MBIR for quantitative measurements of emphysema. Both images were reconstructed with a slice thickness of 0.25 mm and an image matrix size of 1024 × 1024 pixels. For physical evaluation, the modulation transfer function (MTF) and noise power spectrum (NPS) of HIR and MBIR were compared. For clinical evaluation, LAVR calculated from HIR and MBIR were compared using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. In addition, the correlation between LAVR and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1%) was evaluated using the Spearman rank correlation test. The MTFs of HIR and MBIR were comparable. The NPS of MBIR was lower than that of HIR. The mean LAVR values calculated from HIR and MBIR were 19.5 ± 12.6% and 20.4 ± 11.7%, respectively (p = 0.84). The correlation coefficients between LAVR and FEV1% that were taken from HIR and MBIR were 0.64 and 0.74, respectively (p < 0.01). MBIR is more useful than HIR for the quantitative measurements of emphysema with U-HR images.
© 2021. Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Hybrid iterative reconstruction; Model based iterative reconstruction; Modulation transfer function; Noise power spectrum; Ultra-high-resolution

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35023075     DOI: 10.1007/s13246-021-01091-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med        ISSN: 2662-4729


  47 in total

1.  The effects of radiation dose and CT manufacturer on measurements of lung densitometry.

Authors:  Ren Yuan; John R Mayo; James C Hogg; Peter D Paré; Annette M McWilliams; Stephen Lam; Harvey O Coxson
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Complexity of terminal airspace geometry assessed by lung computed tomography in normal subjects and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  M Mishima; T Hirai; H Itoh; Y Nakano; H Sakai; S Muro; K Nishimura; Y Oku; K Chin; M Ohi; T Nakamura; J H Bates; A M Alencar; B Suki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Computed tomographic measurements of airway dimensions and emphysema in smokers. Correlation with lung function.

Authors:  Y Nakano; S Muro; H Sakai; T Hirai; K Chin; M Tsukino; K Nishimura; H Itoh; P D Paré; J C Hogg; M Mishima
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Effects of CT section thickness and reconstruction kernel on emphysema quantification relationship to the magnitude of the CT emphysema index.

Authors:  David S Gierada; Andrew J Bierhals; Cliff K Choong; Seth T Bartel; Jon H Ritter; Nitin A Das; Cheng Hong; Thomas K Pilgram; Kyongtae T Bae; Bruce R Whiting; Jason C Woods; James C Hogg; Barbara A Lutey; Richard J Battafarano; Joel D Cooper; Bryan F Meyers; G Alexander Patterson
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Pulmonary emphysema: radiation dose and section thickness at multidetector CT quantification--comparison with macroscopic and microscopic morphometry.

Authors:  Afarine Madani; Viviane De Maertelaer; Jacqueline Zanen; Pierre Alain Gevenois
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Emphysema: effect of reconstruction algorithm on CT imaging measures.

Authors:  Kirsten L Boedeker; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Sarah R Rogers; Dao A Truong; Matthew S Brown; David W Gjertson; Jonathan G Goldin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Optimal threshold in CT quantification of emphysema.

Authors:  Zhimin Wang; Suicheng Gu; Joseph K Leader; Shinjini Kundu; John R Tedrow; Frank C Sciurba; David Gur; Jill M Siegfried; Jiantao Pu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2017 Report. GOLD Executive Summary.

Authors:  Claus F Vogelmeier; Gerard J Criner; Fernando J Martinez; Antonio Anzueto; Peter J Barnes; Jean Bourbeau; Bartolome R Celli; Rongchang Chen; Marc Decramer; Leonardo M Fabbri; Peter Frith; David M G Halpin; M Victorina López Varela; Masaharu Nishimura; Nicolas Roche; Roberto Rodriguez-Roisin; Don D Sin; Dave Singh; Robert Stockley; Jørgen Vestbo; Jadwiga A Wedzicha; Alvar Agustí
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 9.  Quantitative computed tomography in COPD: possibilities and limitations.

Authors:  O M Mets; P A de Jong; B van Ginneken; H A Gietema; J W J Lammers
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 2.584

10.  Time-series hyperpolarized xenon-129 MRI of lobar lung ventilation of COPD in comparison to V/Q-SPECT/CT and CT.

Authors:  Ozkan Doganay; Tahreema Matin; Mitchell Chen; Minsuok Kim; Anthony McIntyre; Daniel R McGowan; Kevin M Bradley; Thomas Povey; Fergus V Gleeson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.