Literature DB >> 24862530

Differences in behavior of tube current modulation techniques for thoracic CT examinations between male and female anthropomorphic phantoms.

Kosuke Matsubara1, Pei-Jan Paul Lin, Atsushi Fukuda, Kichiro Koshida.   

Abstract

Our objective was to investigate the differences in behavior of tube current modulation (TCM) techniques for thoracic CT examinations between male and female anthropomorphic phantoms. The phantoms were scanned with an automatic exposure control system in the longitudinal (z-) and angular-longitudinal (xyz-) TCM, in addition to the fixed-mA which was used as a reference. Axial dose distributions were measured at the levels of the breasts and the diaphragm, and longitudinal dose distributions were measured from the thoracic-inlet level to the diaphragm level at the center and periphery of the phantoms by use of eight solid-state detectors. Image noise was quantitatively measured continuously from the top to the bottom images of the phantoms. With the male phantom, the percentage of average absorbed dose with the xyz-TCM mode compared to the z-TCM mode was 90.2 % at the level of the nipples. This value was significantly smaller than that for the female phantom (95.6 %, P < 0.0001). With either phantom, the percentage of absorbed doses in the longitudinal direction with the xyz-TCM mode compared to the z-TCM mode at the center of the phantom was almost the same as the percent ratio at the periphery of the phantom. Therefore, the effect of xyz-TCM was less pronounced with the female phantom, especially on the reduction of the breast dose. The increase of image noise at the level of the supraclavicular fossa (in the male phantom) and at the level of the diaphragm (both phantoms) could not be avoided with the use of TCM techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24862530     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-014-0269-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of Z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique with fixed tube current CT scanning of abdomen and pelvis.

Authors:  Mannudeep K Kalra; Michael M Maher; Thomas L Toth; Ravi S Kamath; Elkan F Halpern; Sanjay Saini
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Radiation dose reduction to the breast in thoracic CT: comparison of bismuth shielding, organ-based tube current modulation, and use of a globally decreased tube current.

Authors:  Jia Wang; Xinhui Duan; Jodie A Christner; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Radiation dose estimations to the thorax using organ-based dose modulation.

Authors:  Matthew P Lungren; Terry T Yoshizumi; Samuel M Brady; Greta Toncheva; Colin Anderson-Evans; Carolyn Lowry; Xiaodong R Zhou; Donald Frush; Lynne M Hurwitz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Michael R Bruesewitz; James M Kofler
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Chest CT performed with 3D and z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique: breast and effective doses.

Authors:  Kosuke Matsubara; Tadanori Takata; Kichiro Koshida; Kimiya Noto; Tetsunori Shimono; Junsei Horii; Tomoyuki Yamamoto; Osamu Matsui
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Utilizing a simple CT dosimetry phantom for the comprehension of the operational characteristics of CT AEC systems.

Authors:  Ioannis A Tsalafoutas; Athanasios Varsamidis; Stella Thalassinou; Efstathios P Efstathopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Radiation dose savings for adult pulmonary embolus 64-MDCT using bismuth breast shields, lower peak kilovoltage, and automatic tube current modulation.

Authors:  Lynne M Hurwitz; Terry T Yoshizumi; Philip C Goodman; Rendon C Nelson; Greta Toncheva; Giao B Nguyen; Carolyn Lowry; Colin Anderson-Evans
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Dose reduction in multidetector CT using attenuation-based online tube current modulation.

Authors:  Denis Tack; Viviane De Maertelaer; Pierre Alain Gevenois
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Dose to radiosensitive organs during routine chest CT: effects of tube current modulation.

Authors:  Erin Angel; Nazanin Yaghmai; Cecilia Matilda Jude; John J DeMarco; Christopher H Cagnon; Jonathan G Goldin; Cynthia H McCollough; Andrew N Primak; Dianna D Cody; Donna M Stevens; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Assessment of an organ-based tube current modulation in thoracic computed tomography.

Authors:  Kosuke Matsubara; Mai Sugai; Asami Toyoda; Haruka Koshida; Keita Sakuta; Tadanori Takata; Kichiro Koshida; Hiroji Iida; Osamu Matsui
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.