Literature DB >> 24854018

Online and post-trial feedback differentially affect implicit adaptation to a visuomotor rotation.

Raphael Schween1, Wolfgang Taube, Albert Gollhofer, Christian Leukel.   

Abstract

Multiple motor learning processes can be discriminated in visuomotor rotation paradigms. At least four processes have been proposed: Implicit adaptation updates an internal model based on prediction errors. Model-free reinforcement reinforces actions that achieve task success. Use-dependent learning favors repetition of prior movements, and strategic learning uses explicit knowledge about the task. The current experiment tested whether the processes involved in motor learning differ when visual feedback is altered. Specifically, we hypothesized that online and post-trial feedback would cause different amounts of implicit adaptation. Twenty subjects performed drawing movements to targets under a 45° counterclockwise visuomotor rotation while aiming at a clockwise adjacent target. Subjects received visual feedback via a cursor on a screen. One group saw the cursor throughout the movement (online feedback), while the other only saw the final position after movement execution (post-trial feedback). Both groups initially hit the target by applying the strategy. After 80 trials, subjects with online feedback had drifted in clockwise direction [mean direction error: 15.1° (SD 11.2°)], thus overcompensating the rotation. Subjects with post-trial feedback remained accurate [mean: 0.7° (SD 2.0°), TIME × GROUP: F = 3.926, p = 0.003]. We interpret this overcompensation to reflect implicit adaptation isolated from other mechanisms, because it is driven by prediction error rather than task success (model-free reinforcement) or repetition (use-dependent learning). The current findings extend previous work (e.g., Mazzoni and Krakauer in J Neurosci 26:3642-3645, 2006; Hinder et al. in Exp Brain Res 201:191-207, 2010) and suggest that online feedback promotes more implicit adaptation than does post-trial feedback.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24854018     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3992-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  24 in total

Review 1.  What the cerebellum computes.

Authors:  Tatsuya Ohyama; William L Nores; Matthew Murphy; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  Dissociating the roles of the cerebellum and motor cortex during adaptive learning: the motor cortex retains what the cerebellum learns.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Alejandro Vazquez; Neel Pasricha; Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Is proprioception calibrated during visually guided movements?

Authors:  Pierre-Michel Bernier; Romeo Chua; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching.

Authors:  Ya-Weng Tseng; Jörn Diedrichsen; John W Krakauer; Reza Shadmehr; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Rethinking motor learning and savings in adaptation paradigms: model-free memory for successful actions combines with internal models.

Authors:  Vincent S Huang; Adrian Haith; Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Model-based and model-free mechanisms of human motor learning.

Authors:  Adrian M Haith; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

8.  Real-time error detection but not error correction drives automatic visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Mark R Hinder; Stephan Riek; James R Tresilian; Aymar de Rugy; Richard G Carson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Adaptation to visual feedback delay influences visuomotor learning.

Authors:  Takuya Honda; Masaya Hirashima; Daichi Nozaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Disruption of state estimation in the human lateral cerebellum.

Authors:  R Chris Miall; Lars O D Christensen; Owen Cain; James Stanley
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  12 in total

1.  Task Errors Drive Memories That Improve Sensorimotor Adaptation.

Authors:  Li-Ann Leow; Welber Marinovic; Aymar de Rugy; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Assessing explicit strategies in force field adaptation.

Authors:  Raphael Schween; Samuel D McDougle; Mathias Hegele; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Exposure to Auditory Feedback Delay while Speaking Induces Perceptual Habituation but does not Mitigate the Disruptive Effect of Delay on Speech Auditory-motor Learning.

Authors:  Douglas M Shiller; Takashi Mitsuya; Ludo Max
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  An implicit memory of errors limits human sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Scott T Albert; Jihoon Jang; Hannah R Sheahan; Lonneke Teunissen; Koenraad Vandevoorde; David J Herzfeld; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-02-04

5.  Awareness of sensorimotor adaptation to visual rotations of different size.

Authors:  Susen Werner; Bernice C van Aken; Thomas Hulst; Maarten A Frens; Jos N van der Geest; Heiko K Strüder; Opher Donchin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Visuomotor adaptation needs a validation of prediction error by feedback error.

Authors:  Valérie Gaveau; Claude Prablanc; Damien Laurent; Yves Rossetti; Anne-Emmanuelle Priot
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  In Experts, underlying processes that drive visuomotor adaptation are different than in Novices.

Authors:  Christian Leukel; Albert Gollhofer; Wolfgang Taube
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Visuomotor Prediction Errors Modulate EEG Activity Over Parietal Cortex.

Authors:  F-A Savoie; F Thénault; K Whittingstall; P-M Bernier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Conventional analysis of trial-by-trial adaptation is biased: Empirical and theoretical support using a Bayesian estimator.

Authors:  Daniel Blustein; Ahmed Shehata; Kevin Englehart; Jonathon Sensinger
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 10.  Mini-review: The Role of the Cerebellum in Visuomotor Adaptation.

Authors:  Elinor Tzvi; Sebastian Loens; Opher Donchin
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.648

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.