Literature DB >> 16044301

Is proprioception calibrated during visually guided movements?

Pierre-Michel Bernier1, Romeo Chua, Ian M Franks.   

Abstract

In the present study, a visuomotor adaptation paradigm was used to determine whether proprioception is calibrated during visually guided movements. A full vision group (FV) was given vision of a cursor representing hand position and was asked to aim towards visible targets. A no vision group (NV) performed the same task without vision of the cursor and was given knowledge of results (KR) after movement completion. A directional bias was introduced between the location of the cursor and the location of the hand in an adaptation phase, which resulted in a deviation to the right of the intended target. Of interest was whether participants would still show rightward deviations in a post-test series of trials in which vision was removed (aftereffects). The NV group presented strong aftereffects. However, the FV group only showed modest aftereffects early in the post-test, which rapidly decayed over the course of the post-test. Further analyses showed that the presence of those early aftereffects was due to an offline influence of vision on movement planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16044301     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0063-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  10 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Adaptation to a visuomotor shift depends on the starting posture.

Authors:  Pierre Baraduc; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Strategic calibration and spatial alignment: a model from prism adaptation.

Authors:  Gordon M Redding; Benjamin Wallace
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  On the role of visual afferent information for the control of aiming movements toward targets of different sizes.

Authors:  Luc Proteau; Geneviève Isabelle
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Right temporoparietal cortex activation during visuo-proprioceptive conflict.

Authors:  Daniela Balslev; Finn A Nielsen; Olaf B Paulson; Ian Law
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Adaptation in visuomanual tracking depends on intact proprioception.

Authors:  O Guedon; G Gauthier; J Cole; J L Vercher; J Blouin
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.328

7.  Specificity of practice: the case of powerlifting.

Authors:  L Tremblay; L Proteau
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.500

8.  The control of sequential goal-directed movement: learning to use feedback or central planning?

Authors:  D Elliott; K L Ricker; J Lyons
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.422

9.  Representation of hand position prior to movement and motor variability.

Authors:  M Desmurget; Y Rossetti; C Prablanc; G E Stelmach; M Jeannerod
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.273

10.  Adaptation to visual displacement: contribution of proprioceptive, visual, and attentional factors.

Authors:  J A Mather; J R Lackner
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.490

  10 in total
  17 in total

1.  Enhanced mechanical transparency during practice impedes open-loop control of a complex tool.

Authors:  Sandra Sülzenbrück; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Constraints on visuo-motor adaptation depend on the type of visual feedback during practice.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Mathias Hegele
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The trajectory of adaptation to the visuo-motor transformation of virtual and real sliding levers.

Authors:  Sandra Sülzenbrück; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Flexibility and individual differences in visuo-proprioceptive integration: evidence from the analysis of a morphokinetic control task.

Authors:  Philippe Boulinguez; Joëlle Rouhana
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Retention of proprioceptive recalibration following visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Nilufer Nourouzpour; Danielle Salomonczyk; Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Two-phase strategy of neural control for planar reaching movements: I. XY coordination variability and its relation to end-point variability.

Authors:  Miya K Rand; Yury P Shimansky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: a review.

Authors:  Roland Sigrist; Georg Rauter; Robert Riener; Peter Wolf
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

8.  Variance in exposed perturbations impairs retention of visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Cesar Augusto Canaveral; Frédéric Danion; Félix Berrigan; Pierre-Michel Bernier
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Adaptation to proprioceptive targets following visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Jenna C Flannigan; Ruth J Posthuma; Jesse N Lombardo; Chelsea Murray; Erin K Cressman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The effect of continuous, nonlinearly transformed visual feedback on rapid aiming movements.

Authors:  Martina Rieger; Willem B Verwey; Cristina Massen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.