Literature DB >> 15909289

Dose escalation trial designs based on a molecularly targeted endpoint.

Sally Hunsberger1, Lawrence V Rubinstein, Janet Dancey, Edward L Korn.   

Abstract

Traditional phase I dose-finding studies for chemotoxic agents base dose escalation on toxicity, with escalation continuing until unacceptable toxicity is observed. Recent development of molecularly targeted agents that have little or no toxicity in the therapeutic dose range has raised questions over the best study designs for phase I studies. Two types of designs are proposed and evaluated in this paper. In these designs, escalation is based on a binary response that indicates whether or not the agent has had the desired effect on the molecular target. One design is developed to ensure that if the true target response rate is low there will be a high probability of escalating and if the true target response rate is high there will be a low probability of escalating. The other design is developed to continue to escalate as long as the true response rate is increasing and to stop escalating when the response rate plateaus or decreases. A limited simulation study is performed and the designs are compared with respect to the dose level at the end of escalation and the number of patients treated on study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15909289     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  32 in total

Review 1.  Current challenges for the early clinical development of anticancer drugs in the era of molecularly targeted agents.

Authors:  Christophe Le Tourneau; Véronique Diéras; Patricia Tresca; Wulfran Cacheux; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 4.493

2.  Proposal for size justification of expanded cohort at phase-2-recommended dose.

Authors:  Nicolas Penel; Charles Fournier; Jocelyne Bérille
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  Predictors for establishing recommended phase 2 doses: analysis of 320 dose-seeking oncology phase 1 trials.

Authors:  Nicolas Penel; Alain Duhamel; Antoine Adenis; Patrick Devos; Nicolas Isambert; Stéphanie Clisant; Jacques Bonneterre
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  A robust Bayesian dose-finding design for phase I/II clinical trials.

Authors:  Suyu Liu; Valen E Johnson
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Phase I Immunotherapy Trial with Two Chimeric HER-2 B-Cell Peptide Vaccines Emulsified in Montanide ISA 720VG and Nor-MDP Adjuvant in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Robert Wesolowski; Daniel H Ahn; Christina Wu; Amir Mortazavi; Maryam Lustberg; Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy; Jeffrey Fowler; Lai Wei; Jay Overholser; Pravin T P Kaumaya
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Statistical controversies in clinical research: requiem for the 3 + 3 design for phase I trials.

Authors:  X Paoletti; M Ezzalfani; C Le Tourneau
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Innovative Clinical Trial Designs: Toward a 21st-Century Health Care System.

Authors:  Tze L Lai; Philip W Lavori
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2011-12

8.  A Phase I/II adaptive design to determine the optimal treatment regimen from a set of combination immunotherapies in high-risk melanoma.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Craig L Slingluff; Gina R Petroni
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  Adaptive designs for identifying optimal biological dose for molecularly targeted agents.

Authors:  Yong Zang; J Jack Lee; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.486

10.  Early phase trial design for assessing several dose levels for toxicity and efficacy for targeted agents.

Authors:  Antje Hoering; Alan Mitchell; Michael LeBlanc; John Crowley
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 2.486

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.