Literature DB >> 20215546

An overview of the optimal planning, design, and conduct of phase I studies of new therapeutics.

Patricia M LoRusso1, Scott A Boerner, Lesley Seymour.   

Abstract

Phase I clinical trials represent the first step in bringing promising new treatments from the laboratory to the clinic. Although the importance of phase I clinical trials is widely recognized, there is currently no consensus among the scientific, medical, and statistical communities on how best to do these studies in humans. With the advent of targeted therapies, it has become evident that we need to tailor the design of phase I studies for the particular drug class under investigation and any endpoints that are being defined. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Investigational Drug Steering Committee (IDSC) provides broad external scientific and clinical input on the design and prioritization of early-phase clinical trials with agents for which the NCI Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) holds an Investigational New Drug (IND) application through the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The IDSC has formed a number of task forces and working groups, including the Clinical Trial Design Task Force and the Biomarker Working Group, many with membership from within the IDSC as well as external experts, including participants from academia, the pharmaceutical industry, and regulatory authorities. The Clinical Trials Design Taskforce sponsored a Phase I Workshop with the primary goal being to develop consensus recommendations for the optimal design of phase I studies. The primary focus included (1) efficient trial designs, (2) phase I drug combinations, and (3) appropriate statistical and correlative endpoints. In this CCR Focus series, articles summarize key aspects and recommendations on phase I studies (including combination trials), such as design, use of biomarkers, the European Union and Japanese perspectives on design, requirements for first-in-human and other phase I studies, and ensuring regulatory and International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) compliance. A final article summarizes recommendations for the design and conduct of phase II studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20215546     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  38 in total

1.  Novel therapies, high-risk pediatric research, and the prospect of benefit: learning from the ethical disagreements.

Authors:  Inmaculada de Melo-Martín; Dolan Sondhi; Ronald G Crystal
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 2.  The changing landscape of phase I trials in oncology.

Authors:  Kit Man Wong; Anna Capasso; S Gail Eckhardt
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Beyond the dose-limiting toxicity period: Dermatologic adverse events of patients on phase 1 trials of the Cancer Therapeutics Evaluation Program.

Authors:  Alexander Drilon; Anne A Eaton; Katja Schindler; Mrinal M Gounder; David R Spriggs; Pamela Harris; S Percy Ivy; Alexia Iasonos; Mario E Lacouture; David M Hyman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  An innovative, multi-arm, complete phase 1b study of the novel anti-cancer agent tasisulam in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Robert M Jotte; Daniel D Von Hoff; Fadi Braiteh; Carlos R Becerra; Donald A Richards; David A Smith; Lawrence Garbo; Joe Stephenson; Paul R Conkling; Francisco Robert-Vizcarrondo; Jian Chen; P Kellie Turner; Kay Hoong Chow; D Fritz Tai; Robert Ilaria
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 3.850

5.  American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: the critical role of phase I trials in cancer research and treatment.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Weber; Laura A Levit; Peter C Adamson; Suanna Bruinooge; Howard A Burris; Michael A Carducci; Adam P Dicker; Mithat Gönen; Stephen M Keefe; Michael A Postow; Michael A Thompson; David M Waterhouse; Susan L Weiner; Lynn M Schuchter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Innovative Clinical Trial Designs: Toward a 21st-Century Health Care System.

Authors:  Tze L Lai; Philip W Lavori
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2011-12

7.  A Phase I/II adaptive design to determine the optimal treatment regimen from a set of combination immunotherapies in high-risk melanoma.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Craig L Slingluff; Gina R Petroni
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Adaptive designs for identifying optimal biological dose for molecularly targeted agents.

Authors:  Yong Zang; J Jack Lee; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 9.  Design of phase I combination trials: recommendations of the Clinical Trial Design Task Force of the NCI Investigational Drug Steering Committee.

Authors:  Channing J Paller; Penelope A Bradbury; S Percy Ivy; Lesley Seymour; Patricia M LoRusso; Laurence Baker; Larry Rubinstein; Erich Huang; Deborah Collyar; Susan Groshen; Steven Reeves; Lee M Ellis; Daniel J Sargent; Gary L Rosner; Michael L LeBlanc; Mark J Ratain
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 10.  From drug discovery to biomarker-driven clinical trials in lymphoma.

Authors:  Anas Younes; Donald A Berry
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.