Literature DB >> 26928191

Implementation of adaptive methods in early-phase clinical trials.

Gina R Petroni1, Nolan A Wages1, Gautier Paux2, Frédéric Dubois2.   

Abstract

There has been constant development of novel statistical methods in the design of early-phase clinical trials since the introduction of model-based designs, yet the traditional or modified 3+3 algorithmic design remains the most widely used approach in dose-finding studies. Research has shown the limitations of this traditional design compared with more innovative approaches yet the use of these model-based designs remains infrequent. This can be attributed to several causes including a poor understanding from clinicians and reviewers into how the designs work, and how best to evaluate the appropriateness of a proposed design. These barriers are likely to be enhanced in the coming years as the recent paradigm of drug development involves a shift to more complex dose-finding problems. This article reviews relevant information that should be included in clinical trial protocols to aid in the acceptance and approval of novel methods. We provide practical guidance for implementing these efficient designs with the aim of augmenting a broader transition from algorithmic to adaptive model-guided designs. In addition we highlight issues to consider in the actual implementation of a trial once approval is obtained.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive methods; dose-finding; protocol development

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26928191      PMCID: PMC5003756          DOI: 10.1002/sim.6910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  26 in total

1.  Designs for single- or multiple-agent phase I trials.

Authors:  Mark R Conaway; Stephanie Dunbar; Shyamal D Peddada
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Continual reassessment method: a likelihood approach.

Authors:  J O'Quigley; L Z Shen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Continual Reassessment and Related Dose-Finding Designs.

Authors:  John O'Quigley; Mark Conaway
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.901

4.  Modified toxicity probability interval design: a safer and more reliable method than the 3 + 3 design for practical phase I trials.

Authors:  Yuan Ji; Sue-Jane Wang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Phase I trial of induction histone deacetylase and proteasome inhibition followed by surgery in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  David R Jones; Christopher A Moskaluk; Heidi H Gillenwater; Gina R Petroni; Sandra G Burks; Jennifer Philips; Patrice K Rehm; Juan Olazagasti; Benjamin D Kozower; Yongde Bao
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 6.  Extended model-based designs for more complex dose-finding studies.

Authors:  John O'Quigley; Mark Conaway
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  A Phase I/II adaptive design for heterogeneous groups with application to a stereotactic body radiation therapy trial.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Paul W Read; Gina R Petroni
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 1.894

8.  Phase I study of neratinib in combination with temsirolimus in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-dependent and other solid tumors.

Authors:  Leena Gandhi; Rastislav Bahleda; Sara M Tolaney; Eunice L Kwak; James M Cleary; Shuchi S Pandya; Antoine Hollebecque; Richat Abbas; Revathi Ananthakrishnan; Anna Berkenblit; Mizue Krygowski; Yali Liang; Kathleen W Turnbull; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Jean-Charles Soria
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Performance of two-stage continual reassessment method relative to an optimal benchmark.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Mark R Conaway; John O'Quigley
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 10.  Dose escalation methods in phase I cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Christophe Le Tourneau; J Jack Lee; Lillian L Siu
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  17 in total

1.  Flexible Phase I-II design for partially ordered regimens with application to therapeutic cancer vaccines.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Craig L Slingluff
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2019-06-04

2.  Phase I Designs that Allow for Uncertainty in the Attribution of Adverse Events.

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; John O'Quigley
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 1.864

3.  Implementation of a Model-Based Design in a Phase Ib Study of Combined Targeted Agents.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Craig A Portell; Michael E Williams; Mark R Conaway; Gina R Petroni
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Statistical controversies in clinical research: early-phase adaptive design for combination immunotherapies.

Authors:  N A Wages; C L Slingluff; G R Petroni
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Tailoring early-phase clinical trial design to address multiple research objectives.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Craig L Slingluff; Timothy N Bullock; Gina R Petroni
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 6.968

6.  The Impact of Early-Phase Trial Design in the Drug Development Process.

Authors:  Mark R Conaway; Gina R Petroni
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  The immune system's role in sepsis progression, resolution, and long-term outcome.

Authors:  Matthew J Delano; Peter A Ward
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 12.988

8.  A web application for evaluating Phase I methods using a non-parametric optimal benchmark.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Nikole Varhegyi
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Dimension of model parameter space and operating characteristics in adaptive dose-finding studies.

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; Nolan A Wages; Mark R Conaway; Ken Cheung; Ying Yuan; John O'Quigley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Revisiting isotonic phase I design in the era of model-assisted dose-finding.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Mark R Conaway
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 2.486

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.