| Literature DB >> 24830328 |
Rosalina James1, Rebecca Tsosie2, Puneet Sahota3, Myra Parker4, Denise Dillard5, Ileen Sylvester5, John Lewis6, Joseph Klejka7, LeeAnna Muzquiz8, Polly Olsen9, Ron Whitener10, Wylie Burke1.
Abstract
The data-sharing policies of the National Institutes of Health aim to maximize public benefit derived from genetic studies by increasing research efficiency and use of a pooled data resource for future studies. Although broad access to data may lead to benefits for populations underrepresented in genetic studies, such as indigenous groups, tribes have ownership interest in their data. The Northwest-Alaska Pharmacogenetic Research Network, a partnership involving tribal organizations and universities conducting basic and translational pharmacogenetic research, convened a meeting to discuss the collection, management, and secondary use of research data, and of the processes surrounding access to data stored in federal repositories. This article reports the tribal perspectives that emerged from the dialogue and discusses the implications of tribal government sovereign status on research agreements and data-sharing negotiations. There is strong tribal support for efficient research processes that expedite the benefits from collaborative research, but there is also a need for data-sharing procedures that take into account tribal sovereignty and appropriate oversight of research--such as tribally based research review processes and review of draft manuscripts. We also note specific ways in which accountability could be encouraged by the National Institutes of Health as part of the research process.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24830328 PMCID: PMC4224626 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2014.47
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genet Med ISSN: 1098-3600 Impact factor: 8.822