Literature DB >> 22415847

Ethical aspects of participation in the database of genotypes and phenotypes of the National Center for Biotechnology Information: the Cancer and Leukemia Group B Experience.

Jeffrey Peppercorn1, Iuliana Shapira, Teressa Deshields, Deanna Kroetz, Paula Friedman, Patricia Spears, Deborah E Collyar, Lawrence N Shulman, Lynn Dressler, Monica M Bertagnolli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rapid pace of genetics research, coupled with evolving standards for informed consent, can create ethical challenges regarding future use of tissue or information from completed clinical trials. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) Oncology Cooperative Group was faced with an ethical dilemma regarding sharing genetic data from a completed genome-wide association study (GWAS) that was conducted as part of a large, multicenter breast cancer clinical trial with a national database: the Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes National Center for Biotechnology Information (dbGaP).
METHODS: The CALGB Ethics Committee conducted a series of multidisciplinary meetings and teleconferences involving patient advocates, bioethicists, clinical researchers, and clinical oncologists to evaluate the ethical issues raised by this case and to identify lessons for improving informed consent to future genetics research in oncology trials.
RESULTS: The Ethics Committee recommended that GWAS data be provided to dbGaP consistent with documented consent for future use of tissue among trial participants. Ethical issues, including adequacy of informed consent to future research, limitations of privacy in modern genetics research, the potential impact of population-based genetics research on health disparities, and recontact of research participants for clinical care or further research, were identified as major ethical considerations in this area.
CONCLUSIONS: Although modern standards for informed consent should not prohibit research or sharing of data consistent with participant's intent and the public interest, there is an urgent need for national consensus on the appropriate use of archived tissue and standardized informed consent for future research among cancer clinical trial participants.
Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22415847     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  10 in total

1.  The use of research biopsies in oncology trials: challenges and controversies.

Authors:  Katherine V Ferry-Galow; Alice P Chen
Journal:  J Hosp Manag Health Policy       Date:  2019-04-01

2.  Secondary Use of Patient Tissue in Cancer Biobanks.

Authors:  Debra J H Mathews; Julia T Rabin; Katharine Quain; Eric Campbell; Deborah Collyar; Fay J Hlubocky; Steven Isakoff; Jeffrey Peppercorn
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-06-10

3.  Big Data Privacy in Biomedical Research.

Authors:  Shuang Wang; Luca Bonomi; Wenrui Dai; Feng Chen; Cynthia Cheung; Cinnamon S Bloss; Samuel Cheng; Xiaoqian Jiang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Big Data       Date:  2016-09-13

4.  Patient/family views on data sharing in rare diseases: study in the European LeukoTreat project.

Authors:  Sylviane Darquy; Grégoire Moutel; Anne-Sophie Lapointe; Diane D'Audiffret; Julie Champagnat; Samia Guerroui; Marie-Louise Vendeville; Odile Boespflug-Tanguy; Nathalie Duchange
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Patient Preferences for Use of Archived Biospecimens from Oncology Trials When Adequacy of Informed Consent Is Unclear.

Authors:  Jeffrey Peppercorn; Eric Campbell; Steve Isakoff; Nora K Horick; Julia Rabin; Katharine Quain; Lecia V Sequist; Aditya Bardia; Deborah Collyar; Fay Hlubocky; Debra Mathews
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-09-06

6.  Challenges of web-based personal genomic data sharing.

Authors:  Mahsa Shabani; Pascal Borry
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2015-03-27

7.  Considerations for an integrated population health databank in Africa: lessons from global best practices.

Authors:  Jude O Igumbor; Edna N Bosire; Marta Vicente-Crespo; Ehimario U Igumbor; Uthman A Olalekan; Tobias F Chirwa; Sam M Kinyanjui; Catherine Kyobutungi; Sharon Fonn
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2021-08-23

Review 8.  Exploring pathways to trust: a tribal perspective on data sharing.

Authors:  Rosalina James; Rebecca Tsosie; Puneet Sahota; Myra Parker; Denise Dillard; Ileen Sylvester; John Lewis; Joseph Klejka; LeeAnna Muzquiz; Polly Olsen; Ron Whitener; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  A human rights approach to an international code of conduct for genomic and clinical data sharing.

Authors:  Bartha M Knoppers; Jennifer R Harris; Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne; Edward S Dove
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Young people's views about the purpose and composition of research ethics committees: findings from the PEARL qualitative study.

Authors:  Suzanne Audrey; Lindsey Brown; Rona Campbell; Andy Boyd; John Macleod
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.652

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.