Literature DB >> 24792908

Cerebellar direct current stimulation enhances motor learning in older adults.

Robert M Hardwick1, Pablo A Celnik2.   

Abstract

Developing novel approaches to combat age related declines in motor function is key to maintaining health and function in older adults, a subgroup of the population that is rapidly growing. Motor adaptation, a form of motor learning, has been shown to be impaired in healthy older subjects compared with their younger counterparts. Here, we tested whether excitatory anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the cerebellum could enhance adaptation in older subjects. Participants performed a "center-out" reaching task, adapting to the sudden introduction of a visual cursor rotation. Older participants receiving sham tDCS (mean age 56.3 ± 6.8 years) were slower to adapt than younger participants (mean age 20.7 ± 2.1 years). In contrast, older participants who received anodal tDCS (mean age 59.6 ± 8.1 years) adapted faster, with a rate that was similar to younger subjects. We conclude that cerebellar anodal tDCS enhances motor adaptation in older individuals. Our results highlight the efficacy of the novel approach of using cerebellar tDCS to combat age related deficits in motor learning.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain stimulation; Learning; Motor control; Older subjects; Rehabilitation; Transcranial direct current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24792908      PMCID: PMC4087063          DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.03.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Aging        ISSN: 0197-4580            Impact factor:   4.673


  37 in total

1.  Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Astrid Schauenburg; Nicolas Lang; David Liebetanz; Cornelia Exner; Walter Paulus; Frithjof Tergau
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Implicit and explicit adjustments to extrinsic visuo-motor transformations and their age-related changes.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Mathias Hegele; Sandra Sülzenbrück
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 2.161

3.  Age-related degradation in the central nervous system: assessment with diffusion-tensor imaging and quantitative fiber tracking.

Authors:  Andreas Stadlbauer; Erich Salomonowitz; Guido Strunk; Thilo Hammen; Oliver Ganslandt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation impairs the practice-dependent proficiency increase in working memory.

Authors:  R Ferrucci; S Marceglia; M Vergari; F Cogiamanian; S Mrakic-Sposta; F Mameli; S Zago; S Barbieri; A Priori
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Internal models in the cerebellum.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; R C Miall; M Kawato
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Human locomotor adaptive learning is proportional to depression of cerebellar excitability.

Authors:  Gowri Jayaram; Joseph M Galea; Amy J Bastian; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Modulation of cerebellar excitability by polarity-specific noninvasive direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Gowri Jayaram; Loni Ajagbe; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Polarity-sensitive modulation of cortical neurotransmitters by transcranial stimulation.

Authors:  Charlotte J Stagg; Jonathan G Best; Mary C Stephenson; Jacinta O'Shea; Marzena Wylezinska; Z Tamas Kincses; Peter G Morris; Paul M Matthews; Heidi Johansen-Berg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Polarity and timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in explicit motor learning.

Authors:  C J Stagg; G Jayaram; D Pastor; Z T Kincses; P M Matthews; H Johansen-Berg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 10.  A quantitative meta-analysis and review of motor learning in the human brain.

Authors:  Robert M Hardwick; Claudia Rottschy; R Chris Miall; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  57 in total

1.  Brain-computer interface: current and emerging rehabilitation applications.

Authors:  Janis J Daly; Jane E Huggins
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 2.  Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines.

Authors:  A Antal; I Alekseichuk; M Bikson; J Brockmöller; A R Brunoni; R Chen; L G Cohen; G Dowthwaite; J Ellrich; A Flöel; F Fregni; M S George; R Hamilton; J Haueisen; C S Herrmann; F C Hummel; J P Lefaucheur; D Liebetanz; C K Loo; C D McCaig; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; V Moliadze; M A Nitsche; R Nowak; F Padberg; A Pascual-Leone; W Poppendieck; A Priori; S Rossi; P M Rossini; J Rothwell; M A Rueger; G Ruffini; K Schellhorn; H R Siebner; Y Ugawa; A Wexler; U Ziemann; M Hallett; W Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Cerebellar direct current stimulation enhances on-line motor skill acquisition through an effect on accuracy.

Authors:  Gabriela Cantarero; Danny Spampinato; Janine Reis; Loni Ajagbe; Tziporah Thompson; Kopal Kulkarni; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Targeting the Cerebellum by Noninvasive Neurostimulation: a Review.

Authors:  Kim van Dun; Florian Bodranghien; Mario Manto; Peter Mariën
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Response variability of different anodal transcranial direct current stimulation intensities across multiple sessions.

Authors:  Claudia Ammann; Martin A Lindquist; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Modulation of cerebellar brain inhibition during temporal adaptive learning in a coincident timing task.

Authors:  Shin-Ya Tanaka; Masato Hirano; Kozo Funase
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Changing head model extent affects finite element predictions of transcranial direct current stimulation distributions.

Authors:  Aprinda Indahlastari; Munish Chauhan; Benjamin Schwartz; Rosalind J Sadleir
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Skill acquisition is enhanced by reducing trial-to-trial repetition.

Authors:  Lore W E Vleugels; Stephan P Swinnen; Robert M Hardwick
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Why is the explicit component of motor adaptation limited in elderly adults?

Authors:  Koenraad Vandevoorde; Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  Transcranial cerebellar direct current stimulation and transcutaneous spinal cord direct current stimulation as innovative tools for neuroscientists.

Authors:  Alberto Priori; Matteo Ciocca; Marta Parazzini; Maurizio Vergari; Roberta Ferrucci
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.