Literature DB >> 28032321

Targeting the Cerebellum by Noninvasive Neurostimulation: a Review.

Kim van Dun1, Florian Bodranghien2, Mario Manto2,3, Peter Mariën4,5.   

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic and electric stimulation of the brain are novel and highly promising techniques currently employed in both research and clinical practice. Improving or rehabilitating brain functions by modulating excitability with these noninvasive tools is an exciting new area in neuroscience. Since the cerebellum is closely connected with the cerebral regions subserving motor, associative, and affective functions, the cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathways are an interesting target for these new techniques. Targeting the cerebellum represents a novel way to modulate the excitability of remote cortical regions and their functions. This review brings together the studies that have applied cerebellar stimulation, magnetic and electric, and presents an overview of the current knowledge and unsolved issues. Some recommendations for future research are implemented as well.

Keywords:  Affective; Cerebellum; Clinical; Cognitive; Functional connectivity; Motor; TMS; tDCS

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28032321     DOI: 10.1007/s12311-016-0840-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebellum        ISSN: 1473-4222            Impact factor:   3.847


  209 in total

1.  Cerebellar TMS evokes a long latency motor response in the hand during a visually guided manual tracking task.

Authors:  Koichi Hiraoka; Kenichi Horino; Atsuko Yagura; Akiyoshi Matsugi
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Modulation of steady-state auditory evoked potentials by cerebellar rTMS.

Authors:  Maria A Pastor; Gregor Thut; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Input from muscle and cutaneous nerves of the hand and forearm to neurones of the precentral gyrus of baboons and monkeys.

Authors:  M Wiesendanger
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Human locomotor adaptive learning is proportional to depression of cerebellar excitability.

Authors:  Gowri Jayaram; Joseph M Galea; Amy J Bastian; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation impairs verbal working memory.

Authors:  John E Desmond; S H Annabel Chen; Perry B Shieh
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 10.422

6.  Resetting tremor by single and paired transcranial magnetic stimulation in Parkinson's disease and essential tremor.

Authors:  Ming-Kuei Lu; Shang-Ming Chiou; Ulf Ziemann; Hui-Chun Huang; Yu-Wan Yang; Chon-Haw Tsai
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Cerebellar direct current stimulation modulates pain perception in humans.

Authors:  Tommaso Bocci; Enrica Santarcangelo; Beatrice Vannini; Antonio Torzini; Giancarlo Carli; Roberta Ferrucci; Alberto Priori; Massimiliano Valeriani; Ferdinando Sartucci
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 8.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools.

Authors:  A J Woods; A Antal; M Bikson; P S Boggio; A R Brunoni; P Celnik; L G Cohen; F Fregni; C S Herrmann; E S Kappenman; H Knotkova; D Liebetanz; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; W Paulus; A Priori; D Reato; C Stagg; N Wenderoth; M A Nitsche
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Cerebellar tDCS does not affect performance in the N-back task.

Authors:  Brenda W V van Wessel; M Claire Verhage; Peter Holland; Maarten A Frens; Jos N van der Geest
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 2.475

10.  Cerebellar rTMS disrupts predictive language processing.

Authors:  Elise Lesage; Blaire E Morgan; Andrew C Olson; Antje S Meyer; R Chris Miall
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  38 in total

1.  Consensus Paper: Cerebellum and Social Cognition.

Authors:  Frank Van Overwalle; Mario Manto; Zaira Cattaneo; Silvia Clausi; Chiara Ferrari; John D E Gabrieli; Xavier Guell; Elien Heleven; Michela Lupo; Qianying Ma; Marco Michelutti; Giusy Olivito; Min Pu; Laura C Rice; Jeremy D Schmahmann; Libera Siciliano; Arseny A Sokolov; Catherine J Stoodley; Kim van Dun; Larry Vandervert; Maria Leggio
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 2.  Cerebellar Cortex as a Therapeutic Target for Neurostimulation.

Authors:  Kim van Dun; Hiroshi Mitoma; Mario Manto
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Non-invasive Cerebellar Stimulation: Moving Towards Clinical Applications for Cerebellar and Extra-Cerebellar Disorders.

Authors:  Kim van Dun; Mario Manto
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 4.  A narrative review on non-invasive stimulation of the cerebellum in neurological diseases.

Authors:  Luana Billeri; Antonino Naro
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  What Do We Know About the Influence of the Cerebellum on Walking Ability? Promising Findings from Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Antonino Naro; Demetrio Milardi; Alberto Cacciola; Margherita Russo; Francesca Sciarrone; Gianluca La Rosa; Alessia Bramanti; Placido Bramanti; Rocco Salvatore Calabrò
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Impact of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Cerebellum on Performance of a Ballistic Targeting Movement.

Authors:  Akiyoshi Matsugi; Satoru Nishishita; Naoki Yoshida; Hiroaki Tanaka; Shinya Douchi; Kyota Bando; Kengo Tsujimoto; Takeru Honda; Yutaka Kikuchi; Yuto Shimizu; Masato Odagaki; Hideki Nakano; Yohei Okada; Nobuhiko Mori; Koichi Hosomi; Youichi Saitoh
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 7.  Non-invasive Cerebellar Stimulation: a Promising Approach for Stroke Recovery?

Authors:  Maximilian J Wessel; Friedhelm C Hummel
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  Cerebellar tDCS Alters the Perception of Optic Flow.

Authors:  Jean-François Nankoo; Christopher R Madan; Omar Medina; Tyler Makepeace; Christopher L Striemer
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 9.  Interactions Between Cerebellum and the Intracortical Excitatory Circuits of Motor Cortex: a Mini-Review.

Authors:  George M Opie; Wei-Yeh Liao; John G Semmler
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.847

10.  Symptom-Dependent Changes in MEG-Derived Neuroelectric Brain Activity in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients with Chronic Symptoms.

Authors:  Don Krieger; Paul Shepard; Ryan Soose; Ava M Puccio; Sue Beers; Walter Schneider; Anthony P Kontos; Michael W Collins; David O Okonkwo
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.