Literature DB >> 24792500

Reach and Grasp reconfigurations reveal that proprioception assists reaching and hapsis assists grasping in peripheral vision.

Lauren A Hall1, Jenni M Karl, Brittany L Thomas, Ian Q Whishaw.   

Abstract

The dual visuomotor channel theory proposes that prehension consists of a Reach that transports the hand in relation to an object's extrinsic properties (e.g., location) and a Grasp that shapes the hand to an object's intrinsic properties (e.g., size and shape). In central vision, the Reach and the Grasp are integrated but when an object cannot be seen, the movements can decompose with the Reach first used to locate the object and the Grasp postponed until it is assisted by touch. Reaching for an object in a peripheral visual field is an everyday act, and although it is reported that there are changes in Grasp aperture with target eccentricity, it is not known whether the configuration of the Reach and the Grasp also changes. The present study examined this question by asking participants to reach for food items at 0° or 22.5° and 45° from central gaze. Participants made 15 reaches for a larger round donut ball and a smaller blueberry, and hand movements were analyzed using frame-by-frame video inspection and linear kinematics. Perception of targets was degraded as participants could not identify objects in peripheral vision but did recognize their differential size. The Reach to peripheral targets featured a more dorsal trajectory, a more open hand, and less accurate digit placement. The Grasp featured hand adjustments or target manipulations after contact, which were associated with a prolonged Grasp duration. Thus, Grasps to peripheral vision did not consist only of a simple modification of visually guided reaching but included the addition of somatosensory assistance. The kinematic and behavioral changes argue that proprioception assists the Reach and touch assists the Grasp in peripheral vision, supporting the idea that Reach and Grasp movements are used flexibly in relation to sensory guidance depending upon the salience of target properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24792500     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3945-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  44 in total

1.  Human posterior parietal cortex flexibly determines reference frames for reaching based on sensory context.

Authors:  Pierre-Michel Bernier; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Peripheral vision for perception and action.

Authors:  Liana E Brown; Brooke A Halpert; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  How humans reach: distinct cortical systems for central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Simon Clavagnier; Jérôme Prado; Henry Kennedy; Marie-Thérèse Perenin
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.519

4.  Cortical connections of functional zones in posterior parietal cortex and frontal cortex motor regions in new world monkeys.

Authors:  Omar A Gharbawie; Iwona Stepniewska; Jon H Kaas
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  To use or to move: goal-set modulates priming when grasping real tools.

Authors:  Kenneth F Valyear; Craig S Chapman; Jason P Gallivan; Robert S Mark; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The perceived size of targets in the peripheral and central visual fields.

Authors:  H E Bedell; C A Johnson
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Two cortical systems for reaching in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Jérôme Prado; Simon Clavagnier; Hélène Otzenberger; Christian Scheiber; Henry Kennedy; Marie-Thérèse Perenin
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Effects of visual uncertainty on grasping movements.

Authors:  Erik J Schlicht; Paul R Schrater
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Optic ataxia: a specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects.

Authors:  M T Perenin; A Vighetto
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance.

Authors:  Andrea Loftus; Philip Servos; Melvyn A Goodale; Nicole Mendarozqueta; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  11 in total

1.  Touch the table before the target: contact with an underlying surface may assist the development of precise visually controlled reach and grasp movements in human infants.

Authors:  Jenni M Karl; Alexis M Wilson; Marisa E Bertoli; Noor S Shubear
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Dissociation of the Reach and the Grasp in the destriate (V1) monkey Helen: a new anatomy for the dual visuomotor channel theory of reaching.

Authors:  Ian Q Whishaw; Jenni M Karl; Nicholas K Humphrey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Organization of the reach and grasp in head-fixed vs freely-moving mice provides support for multiple motor channel theory of neocortical organization.

Authors:  Ian Q Whishaw; Jamshid Faraji; Jessica Kuntz; Behroo Mirza Agha; Mukt Patel; Gerlinde A S Metz; Majid H Mohajerani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans.

Authors:  Jenni M Karl; Jessica R Kuntz; Layne A Lenhart; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Gaze anchoring guides real but not pantomime reach-to-grasp: support for the action-perception theory.

Authors:  Jessica R Kuntz; Jenni M Karl; Jon B Doan; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Human string-pulling with and without a string: movement, sensory control, and memory.

Authors:  Surjeet Singh; Alexei Mandziak; Kalob Barr; Ashley A Blackwell; Majid H Mohajerani; Douglas G Wallace; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Proprioceptive sensitivity to imposed finger deflections.

Authors:  Katie H Long; Kristine R McLellan; Maria Boyarinova; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Synchrony of the Reach and the Grasp in pantomime reach-to-grasp.

Authors:  Jessica R Kuntz; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Haptic grasping configurations in early infancy reveal different developmental profiles for visual guidance of the Reach versus the Grasp.

Authors:  Jenni M Karl; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Independent development of the Reach and the Grasp in spontaneous self-touching by human infants in the first 6 months.

Authors:  Brittany L Thomas; Jenni M Karl; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.