Literature DB >> 27056084

Dissociation of the Reach and the Grasp in the destriate (V1) monkey Helen: a new anatomy for the dual visuomotor channel theory of reaching.

Ian Q Whishaw1, Jenni M Karl2, Nicholas K Humphrey3.   

Abstract

Dual visuomotor channel theory proposes that reaching depends on two neural pathways that extend from visual cortex (V1) to motor cortex via the parietal lobe. The Reach pathway directs the hand to the target's location and the Grasp pathway shapes the hand and digits for purchase. Sighted human participants integrate the Reach and the Grasp, but without vision they dissociate the movements to capitalize on tactile cues. They use a Reach with a relatively open hand to locate the target and then they use touch cues to shape the fingers to Grasp. After a V1 lesion, the rhesus monkey, Helen, learned to make near-normal visual discriminations based on size and brightness but displayed visual agnosia. She also learned to reach for food with her mouth and her hands. The present analysis of film of her reaching behavior shows that she dissociated the Reach and the Grasp, as do unsighted human participants reaching for a food target at a fixed location. Her rapid and direct Reach was made with an open hand and extended fingers to contact the food with the palm whereas her Grasp was initiated after she touched the food. She also visually fixated the target during the Reach and visually disengaged after target contact, as do sighted human participants. In contrast, Helen did integrate the Reach and the Grasp to take food from her mouth, demonstrating that she could integrate the movements using online tactile cues. The finding that extrastriate pathways can direct the hand toward extrinsic target properties (location) but not intrinsic target properties (size and shape) is discussed as a novel addition to dual visuomotor channel theory.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dorsal visual stream; Grasp after V1 lesion; Reach after V1 lesion; Striate cortex and reaching; Vision and reaching; Visual control of reaching and grasping

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27056084     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4640-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  49 in total

1.  Complex movements evoked by microstimulation of precentral cortex.

Authors:  Michael S A Graziano; Charlotte S R Taylor; Tirin Moore
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-05-30       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Effects of muscimol inactivations of functional domains in motor, premotor, and posterior parietal cortex on complex movements evoked by electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Iwona Stepniewska; Omar A Gharbawie; Mark J Burish; Jon H Kaas
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Arm movements induced by electrical microstimulation in the superior colliculus of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  Roland Philipp; Klaus-Peter Hoffmann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Human anterior intraparietal area subserves prehension: a combined lesion and functional MRI activation study.

Authors:  F Binkofski; C Dohle; S Posse; K M Stephan; H Hefter; R J Seitz; H J Freund
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Atrophy of retinal ganglion cells after removal of striate cortex in a rhesus monkey.

Authors:  A Cowey
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Impairment of grasping movements following a bilateral posterior parietal lesion.

Authors:  M Jeannerod; J Decety; F Michel
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 7.  Subsystems of sensory attention for skilled reaching: vision for transport and pre-shaping and somatosensation for grasping, withdrawal and release.

Authors:  Lori-Ann R Sacrey; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  Understanding the parietal lobe syndrome from a neurophysiological and evolutionary perspective.

Authors:  Roberto Caminiti; Matthew V Chafee; Alexandra Battaglia-Mayer; Bruno B Averbeck; David A Crowe; Apostolos P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Hand shaping in the rat: conserved release and collection vs. flexible manipulation in overground walking, ladder rung walking, cylinder exploration, and skilled reaching.

Authors:  Ian Q Whishaw; Scott G Travis; Sebastian W Koppe; Lori-Ann Sacrey; Gita Gholamrezaei; Bogdan Gorny
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Grasping without form discrimination in a hemianopic field.

Authors:  M T Perenin; Y Rossetti
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1996-02-29       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  4 in total

1.  Touch the table before the target: contact with an underlying surface may assist the development of precise visually controlled reach and grasp movements in human infants.

Authors:  Jenni M Karl; Alexis M Wilson; Marisa E Bertoli; Noor S Shubear
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Organization of the reach and grasp in head-fixed vs freely-moving mice provides support for multiple motor channel theory of neocortical organization.

Authors:  Ian Q Whishaw; Jamshid Faraji; Jessica Kuntz; Behroo Mirza Agha; Mukt Patel; Gerlinde A S Metz; Majid H Mohajerani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans.

Authors:  Jenni M Karl; Jessica R Kuntz; Layne A Lenhart; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Gaze anchoring guides real but not pantomime reach-to-grasp: support for the action-perception theory.

Authors:  Jessica R Kuntz; Jenni M Karl; Jon B Doan; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 1.972

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.