Literature DB >> 21584628

To use or to move: goal-set modulates priming when grasping real tools.

Kenneth F Valyear1, Craig S Chapman, Jason P Gallivan, Robert S Mark, Jody C Culham.   

Abstract

How we interact with objects depends on what we intend to do with them. In the current work, we show that priming and the kinematics of grasping depend on the goals of grasping, as well as the context in which tasks are presented. We asked participants to grasp familiar kitchen tools in order to either move them, grasp-to-move (GTM), or to demonstrate their common use, grasp-to-use (GTU). When tasks were blocked separately (Experiment 1), we found that priming was only evident for the GTU task. However, when tasks were presented in the same block of trials (Experiment 2), we observed priming for both tasks. Independent of priming, differences in kinematics and reaction times according to task were evident for both Experiments. Longer reaction times for the GTU task indicate more extensive planning, and differences in grasping reflect the characteristics of subsequent actions. Priming of real grasping is determined by task goals as well as task setting, both of which are likely to modulate how object features (affordances) are perceived and influence the planning of future actions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21584628     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2705-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  62 in total

1.  Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP.

Authors:  A Murata; V Gallese; G Luppino; M Kaseda; H Sakata
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Motor facilitation following action observation: a behavioural study in prehensile action.

Authors:  Martin G Edwards; Glyn W Humphreys; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Updating the programming of a precision grip is a function of recent history of available feedback.

Authors:  Robert L Whitwell; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. II. Area F5 and the control of distal movements.

Authors:  G Rizzolatti; R Camarda; L Fogassi; M Gentilucci; G Luppino; M Matelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories.

Authors:  R G Marteniuk; C L MacKenzie; M Jeannerod; S Athenes; C Dugas
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1987-09

6.  Detection by action: neuropsychological evidence for action-defined templates in search.

Authors:  G W Humphreys; M J Riddoch
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Cognitive representations of hand posture in ideomotor apraxia.

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Angela Sirigu; Myrna F Schwartz; Roberta Klatzky
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Different left brain regions are essential for grasping a tool compared with its subsequent use.

Authors:  Jennifer Randerath; Georg Goldenberg; Will Spijkers; Yong Li; Joachim Hermsdörfer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Movement planning in prehension: do intended actions influence the initial reach and grasp movement?

Authors:  Claudia Armbrüster; Will Spijkers
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.422

10.  Is that within reach? fMRI reveals that the human superior parieto-occipital cortex encodes objects reachable by the hand.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Cristiana Cavina-Pratesi; Jody C Culham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  18 in total

1.  Hand shaping using hapsis resembles visually guided hand shaping.

Authors:  Jenni M Karl; Lori-Ann R Sacrey; Jon B Doan; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  From movement to thought: executive function, embodied cognition, and the cerebellum.

Authors:  Leonard F Koziol; Deborah Ely Budding; Dana Chidekel
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Nonvisual learning of intrinsic object properties in a reaching task dissociates grasp from reach.

Authors:  Jenni M Karl; Leandra R Schneider; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Attentional capture for tool images is driven by the head end of the tool, not the handle.

Authors:  Rafal M Skiba; Jacqueline C Snow
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Sensory and semantic activations evoked by action attributes of manipulable objects: Evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Chia-Lin Lee; Hsu-Wen Huang; Kara D Federmeier; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-11-26       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Reach and Grasp reconfigurations reveal that proprioception assists reaching and hapsis assists grasping in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Lauren A Hall; Jenni M Karl; Brittany L Thomas; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Getting a grip: different actions and visual guidance of the thumb and finger in precision grasping.

Authors:  Dean R Melmoth; Simon Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Priming tool actions: Are real objects more effective primes than pictures?

Authors:  Scott D Squires; Scott N Macdonald; Jody C Culham; Jacqueline C Snow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Synchrony of the Reach and the Grasp in pantomime reach-to-grasp.

Authors:  Jessica R Kuntz; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  What neuropsychology tells us about human tool use? The four constraints theory (4CT): mechanics, space, time, and effort.

Authors:  François Osiurak
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 7.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.