Literature DB >> 31734786

Human string-pulling with and without a string: movement, sensory control, and memory.

Surjeet Singh1, Alexei Mandziak2, Kalob Barr2, Ashley A Blackwell3, Majid H Mohajerani2, Douglas G Wallace3, Ian Q Whishaw2.   

Abstract

String-pulling is a behavior that is allied to many daily acts and is an easily performed action featuring hand-over-hand movements to reel in a string (or rope). String-pulling has been used as a test of perceptual and cognitive functions in many animal species, including human children, but its movements and sensory control have not been characterized. Male and female university students (n = 68) performed target-based or memory-based string-pulling in which they pulled down a string suspended on an overhead pulley and immediately afterwards attempted to make the same movement in a memory-based test. Frame-by-frame video scoring was used to describe movements, eye-tracking and visual occluding glasses were used to assess sensory control, and a Matlab video-analysis procedure was used to describe kinematics. The string was advanced using five arm/hand movements: with lift and advance comprising fast up movements, and grasp, pull and push comprising slow down movements. Fingers closed 5 (pinky) through 1 (thumb) to make a whole-hand grasp and release in target-based string pulling but moved in a reverse sequence for the memory-based task. Target-based string pulling was not visually guided unless participants were instructed to grasp at a cue, and then vision featured eye-tracking of the target and pupil dilation with the grasp, but there was no relation between eye events for memory-based string-pulling. For target-based string-pulling the left and right hands advanced the string with both independent and concurrent movement but only independent movements were featured in a more symmetrical memory-based movement. The results are discussed in relation to the sensory control of hand movements, contemporary theories of the neural control of hand movements, and species differences in string-pulling.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bimanual coordination; Kinematics; Pantomime; Reach and grasp; Sensory control; String-pulling

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31734786     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05684-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  44 in total

1.  Fractal dimensions: A new paradigm to assess spatial memory and learning using Morris water maze.

Authors:  Surjeet Singh; Harpreet Kaur; Rajat Sandhir
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  An end to insight? New Caledonian crows can spontaneously solve problems without planning their actions.

Authors:  Alex H Taylor; Brenna Knaebe; Russell D Gray
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Arm to leg coordination in humans during walking, creeping and swimming activities.

Authors:  T Wannier; C Bastiaanse; G Colombo; V Dietz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Optimal response of eye and hand motor systems in pointing at a visual target. II. Static and dynamic visual cues in the control of hand movement.

Authors:  C Prablanc; J E Echallier; M Jeannerod; E Komilis
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Grasping the past. delay can improve visuomotor performance.

Authors:  A D Milner; H C Dijkerman; L Pisella; R D McIntosh; C Tilikete; A Vighetto; Y Rossetti
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Unilateral forelimb sensorimotor cortex devascularization disrupts the topographic and kinematic characteristics of hand movements while string-pulling for food in the rat.

Authors:  Ashley A Blackwell; William L Widick; Joseph L Cheatwood; Ian Q Whishaw; Douglas G Wallace
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Methodological-conceptual problems in the study of chimpanzees' folk physics: how studies with adult humans can help.

Authors:  Francisco J Silva; Dana M Page; Kathleen M Silva
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Apes (Gorilla gorilla, Pan paniscus, P. troglodytes, Pongo abelii) versus corvids (Corvus corax, C. corone) in a support task: the effect of pattern and functionality.

Authors:  Anna Albiach-Serrano; Thomas Bugnyar; Josep Call
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them.

Authors:  M A Goodale; A D Milner; L S Jakobson; D P Carey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  Recent advances in our understanding of the primate corticospinal system.

Authors:  Roger Lemon
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-03-11
View more
  1 in total

1.  A Matlab-based toolbox for characterizing behavior of rodents engaged in string-pulling.

Authors:  Samsoon Inayat; Surjeet Singh; Arashk Ghasroddashti; Pramuka Egodage; Ian Q Whishaw; Majid H Mohajerani
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 8.140

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.