Literature DB >> 29441469

Gaze anchoring guides real but not pantomime reach-to-grasp: support for the action-perception theory.

Jessica R Kuntz1, Jenni M Karl2, Jon B Doan3, Ian Q Whishaw4.   

Abstract

Reach-to-grasp movements feature the integration of a reach directed by the extrinsic (location) features of a target and a grasp directed by the intrinsic (size, shape) features of a target. The action-perception theory suggests that integration and scaling of a reach-to-grasp movement, including its trajectory and the concurrent digit shaping, are features that depend upon online action pathways of the dorsal visuomotor stream. Scaling is much less accurate for a pantomime reach-to-grasp movement, a pretend reach with the target object absent. Thus, the action-perception theory proposes that pantomime movement is mediated by perceptual pathways of the ventral visuomotor stream. A distinguishing visual feature of a real reach-to-grasp movement is gaze anchoring, in which a participant visually fixates the target throughout the reach and disengages, often by blinking or looking away/averting the head, at about the time that the target is grasped. The present study examined whether gaze anchoring is associated with pantomime reaching. The eye and hand movements of participants were recorded as they reached for a ball of one of three sizes, located on a pedestal at arms' length, or pantomimed the same reach with the ball and pedestal absent. The kinematic measures for real reach-to-grasp movements were coupled to the location and size of the target, whereas the kinematic measures for pantomime reach-to-grasp, although grossly reflecting target features, were significantly altered. Gaze anchoring was also tightly coupled to the target for real reach-to-grasp movements, but there was no systematic focus for gaze, either in relation with the virtual target, the previous location of the target, or the participant's reaching hand, for pantomime reach-to-grasp. The presence of gaze anchoring during real vs. its absence in pantomime reach-to-grasp supports the action-perception theory that real, but not pantomime, reaches are online visuomotor actions and is discussed in relation with the neural control of real and pantomime reach-to-grasp movements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action–perception; Dorsal stream; Pantomime reaching; Reach-to-grasp; Ventral stream; Visual attention; Visually guided reaching

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29441469     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5196-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  37 in total

1.  Ventral and dorsal stream contributions to the online control of immediate and delayed grasping: a TMS approach.

Authors:  Nichola Rice Cohen; Emily S Cross; Eugene Tunik; Scott T Grafton; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Neural bases of imitation and pantomime in acute stroke patients: distinct streams for praxis.

Authors:  Markus Hoeren; Dorothee Kümmerer; Tobias Bormann; Lena Beume; Vera M Ludwig; Magnus-Sebastian Vry; Irina Mader; Michel Rijntjes; Christoph P Kaller; Cornelius Weiller
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Dissociation of the Reach and the Grasp in the destriate (V1) monkey Helen: a new anatomy for the dual visuomotor channel theory of reaching.

Authors:  Ian Q Whishaw; Jenni M Karl; Nicholas K Humphrey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The ventral fiber pathway for pantomime of object use.

Authors:  Magnus-Sebastian Vry; Linda C Tritschler; Farsin Hamzei; Michel Rijntjes; Christoph P Kaller; Markus Hoeren; Roza Umarova; Volkmar Glauche; Joachim Hermsdoerfer; Georg Goldenberg; Juergen Hennig; Cornelius Weiller
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Facets of Pantomime.

Authors:  Georg Goldenberg
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.892

6.  The spatial relations between stimulus and response determine an absolute visuo-haptic calibration in pantomime-grasping.

Authors:  Shirin Davarpanah Jazi; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Impairment of grasping movements following a bilateral posterior parietal lesion.

Authors:  M Jeannerod; J Decety; F Michel
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 8.  Subsystems of sensory attention for skilled reaching: vision for transport and pre-shaping and somatosensation for grasping, withdrawal and release.

Authors:  Lori-Ann R Sacrey; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them.

Authors:  M A Goodale; A D Milner; L S Jakobson; D P Carey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Impairment of pronation, supination, and body co-ordination in reach-to-grasp tasks in human Parkinson's disease (PD) reveals homology to deficits in animal models.

Authors:  Ian Q Whishaw; Oksana Suchowersky; Leigh Davis; Justyna Sarna; Gerlinde A Metz; Sergio M Pellis
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2002-07-18       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  2 in total

1.  Human string-pulling with and without a string: movement, sensory control, and memory.

Authors:  Surjeet Singh; Alexei Mandziak; Kalob Barr; Ashley A Blackwell; Majid H Mohajerani; Douglas G Wallace; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Does gesture strengthen sensorimotor knowledge of objects? The case of the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Wim Pouw; Stephanie I Wassenburg; Autumn B Hostetter; Bjorn B de Koning; Fred Paas
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-12-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.