Literature DB >> 24752823

7 Tesla MRI of bone microarchitecture discriminates between women without and with fragility fractures who do not differ by bone mineral density.

Gregory Chang1, Stephen Honig, Yinxiao Liu, Cheng Chen, Kevin K Chu, Chamith S Rajapakse, Kenneth Egol, Ding Xia, Punam K Saha, Ravinder R Regatte.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a disease of poor bone quality. Bone mineral density (BMD) has limited ability to discriminate between subjects without and with poor bone quality, and assessment of bone microarchitecture may have added value in this regard. Our goals were to use 7 T MRI to: (1) quantify and compare distal femur bone microarchitecture in women without and with poor bone quality (defined clinically by presence of fragility fractures); and (2) determine whether microarchitectural parameters could be used to discriminate between these two groups. This study had institutional review board approval, and we obtained written informed consent from all subjects. We used a 28-channel knee coil to image the distal femur of 31 subjects with fragility fractures and 25 controls without fracture on a 7 T MRI scanner using a 3-D fast low angle shot sequence (0.234 mm × 0.234 mm × 1 mm, parallel imaging factor = 2, acquisition time = 7 min 9 s). We applied digital topological analysis to quantify parameters of bone microarchitecture. All subjects also underwent standard clinical BMD assessment in the hip and spine. Compared to controls, fracture cases demonstrated lower bone volume fraction and markers of trabecular number, plate-like structure, and plate-to-rod ratio, and higher markers of trabecular isolation, rod disruption, and network resorption (p < 0.05 for all). There were no differences in hip or spine BMD T-scores between groups (p > 0.05). In receiver-operating-characteristics analyses, microarchitectural parameters could discriminate cases and controls (AUC = 0.66-0.73, p < 0.05). Hip and spine BMD T-scores could not discriminate cases and controls (AUC = 0.58-0.64, p ≥ 0.08). We conclude that 7 T MRI can detect bone microarchitectural deterioration in women with fragility fractures who do not differ by BMD. Microarchitectural parameters might some day be used as an additional tool to detect patients with poor bone quality who cannot be detected by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24752823      PMCID: PMC4363287          DOI: 10.1007/s00774-014-0588-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab        ISSN: 0914-8779            Impact factor:   2.626


  43 in total

1.  Trabecular bone architecture in the distal radius using magnetic resonance imaging in subjects with fractures of the proximal femur. Magnetic Resonance Science Center and Osteoporosis and Arthritis Research Group.

Authors:  S Majumdar; T M Link; P Augat; J C Lin; D Newitt; N E Lane; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  The contribution of trabecular architecture to cancellous bone quality.

Authors:  D W Dempster
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Cancellous bone volume and structure in the forearm: noninvasive assessment with MR microimaging and image processing.

Authors:  F W Wehrli; S N Hwang; J Ma; H K Song; J C Ford; J G Haddad
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Cortical and trabecular bone structure analysis at the distal radius-prediction of biomechanical strength by DXA and MRI.

Authors:  Thomas Baum; Melanie Kutscher; Dirk Müller; Christoph Räth; Felix Eckstein; Eva-Maria Lochmüller; Ernst J Rummeny; Thomas M Link; Jan S Bauer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 5.  Osteoporosis imaging: state of the art and advanced imaging.

Authors:  Thomas M Link
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Micro-finite element analysis applied to high-resolution MRI reveals improved bone mechanical competence in the distal femur of female pre-professional dancers.

Authors:  G Chang; C S Rajapakse; M Diamond; S Honig; M P Recht; D S Weiss; R R Regatte
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Digital topological analysis of in vivo magnetic resonance microimages of trabecular bone reveals structural implications of osteoporosis.

Authors:  F W Wehrli; B R Gomberg; P K Saha; H K Song; S N Hwang; P J Snyder
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Mark Helfand; Steven H Woolf; Janet D Allan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-17       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Architecture and distribution of cancellous bone yield vertebral fracture clues. A histomorphometric analysis of the complete spinal column from 40 autopsy specimens.

Authors:  M Amling; M Pösl; H Ritzel; M Hahn; M Vogel; V J Wening; G Delling
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Women with previous fragility fractures can be classified based on bone microarchitecture and finite element analysis measured with HR-pQCT.

Authors:  K K Nishiyama; H M Macdonald; D A Hanley; S K Boyd
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  MR Imaging of the Musculoskeletal System Using Ultrahigh Field (7T) MR Imaging.

Authors:  Hamza Alizai; Gregory Chang; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2018-10

Review 2.  Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Chantal M J de Bakker; Wei-Ju Tseng; Yihan Li; Hongbo Zhao; X Sherry Liu
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  A Trimodality Comparison of Volumetric Bone Imaging Technologies. Part III: SD, SEE, LSC Association With Fragility Fractures.

Authors:  Andy K O Wong; Karen A Beattie; Kevin K H Min; Zamir Merali; Colin E Webber; Christopher L Gordon; Alexandra Papaioannou; Angela M W Cheung; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  In vivo measurement reproducibility of femoral neck microarchitectural parameters derived from 3T MR images.

Authors:  Alexandra Hotca; Chamith S Rajapakse; Chen Cheng; Stephen Honig; Kenneth Egol; Ravinder R Regatte; Punam K Saha; Gregory Chang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  [Diagnostics in osteology].

Authors:  F Jakob; F Genest; L Seefried; E Tsourdi; C Lapa; L C Hofbauer
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 6.  MRI assessment of bone structure and microarchitecture.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Sean Boone; Dimitri Martel; Chamith S Rajapakse; Robert S Hallyburton; Mitch Valko; Stephen Honig; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  3-T MR Imaging of Proximal Femur Microarchitecture in Subjects with and without Fragility Fracture and Nonosteoporotic Proximal Femur Bone Mineral Density.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Chamith S Rajapakse; Cheng Chen; Arakua Welbeck; Kenneth Egol; Ravinder R Regatte; Punam K Saha; Stephen Honig
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Tissue-Level Mechanical Properties of Bone Contributing to Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Jeffry S Nyman; Mathilde Granke; Robert C Singleton; George M Pharr
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 9.  Reporting knee meniscal tears: technical aspects, typical pitfalls and how to avoid them.

Authors:  Nicolae V Bolog; Gustav Andreisek
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2016-02-16

10.  Daily parathyroid hormone administration enhances bone turnover and preserves bone structure after severe immobilization-induced bone loss.

Authors:  Lauren Harlow; Karim Sahbani; Jeffry S Nyman; Christopher P Cardozo; William A Bauman; Hesham A Tawfeek
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2017-09-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.