Literature DB >> 8836458

Architecture and distribution of cancellous bone yield vertebral fracture clues. A histomorphometric analysis of the complete spinal column from 40 autopsy specimens.

M Amling1, M Pösl, H Ritzel, M Hahn, M Vogel, V J Wening, G Delling.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyze the structure of cancellous bone and its significance for vertebral fractures. Therefore, the complete spinal column from 40 autopsy cases (18 without diseases affecting the skeleton and 12 osteoporotic) was removed and sectioned in the sagittal plane to a thickness of 1 mm. A surface-stained block grinding technique allowed combined two- and three-dimensional histomorphometric analysis, which included an evaluation of the trabecular bone volume (BV/TV, in %) and the trabecular interconnection (TBPf, in mm). In addition, qualitative investigation of the structure of trabecular bone was done. The distribution of trabecular bone volume within the spinal column of a normal skeleton shows a curve, with the highest values in the cervical spine and a decline in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Osteoporosis presents itself with a pathologically diminished trabecular bone volume, whereas the distribution within the spine is comparable to that of the controls. Osteoporotic patients show an apparently reduced trabecular interconnection. It is important that the measured values for TBPf are not only in general higher, but also more widely dispersed. The age-related decrease of trabecular bone mass is due to the transformation from plates to rods. This is quantitatively indicated by the close correlation of BV/TV and TBPf (P < 0.001, r = 0.85). The bone loss in osteoporosis is a loss of structure and a loss of whole trabeculae, which is caused by perforations. It involves a gradual change from normal bone. However, the polyostic heterogeneity in osteoporosis is immense. These structural differences demonstrate the development of regions of least resistance within the spine, serving as an explanation of osteoporotic fractures. Due to the polyostotic heterogeneity it is impossible to define a threshold mineral content for crash fractures by diagnostic measurements at any reference site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8836458     DOI: 10.1007/bf00439050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  46 in total

1.  Biologically meaningful determinants of the in vitro strength of lumbar vertebrae.

Authors:  A Vesterby; L Mosekilde; H J Gundersen; F Melsen; L Mosekilde; K Holme; S Sørensen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Age-related changes in vertebral trabecular bone architecture--assessed by a new method.

Authors:  L Mosekilde
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  Involutional osteoporosis.

Authors:  B L Riggs; L J Melton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols and units. Summary of proposed system.

Authors:  A M Parfitt
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1988-04

5.  Consequences of the remodelling process for vertebral trabecular bone structure: a scanning electron microscopy study (uncoupling of unloaded structures).

Authors:  L Mosekilde
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1990-07

Review 6.  Biomechanical stability of the skeleton--it is not only bone mass, but also bone structure that counts.

Authors:  G Delling; M Amling
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.992

7.  The Conneulor: unbiased estimation of connectivity using physical disectors under projection.

Authors:  H J Gundersen; R W Boyce; J R Nyengaard; A Odgaard
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Bone remodeling in response to in vivo fatigue microdamage.

Authors:  D B Burr; R B Martin; M B Schaffler; E L Radin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur and spine with aging. Differences between the postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis syndromes.

Authors:  B L Riggs; H W Wahner; E Seeman; K P Offord; W L Dunn; R B Mazess; K A Johnson; L J Melton
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Polyostotic heterogeneity of the spine in osteoporosis. Quantitative analysis and three-dimensional morphology.

Authors:  M Amling; H J Grote; M Pösl; M Hahn; G Delling
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1994-12
View more
  23 in total

1.  7T MRI of distal radius trabecular bone microarchitecture: How trabecular bone quality varies depending on distance from end-of-bone.

Authors:  Lindsay M Griffin; Stephen Honig; Cheng Chen; Punam K Saha; Ravinder Regatte; Gregory Chang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Finite element analysis applied to 3-T MR imaging of proximal femur microarchitecture: lower bone strength in patients with fragility fractures compared with control subjects.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Stephen Honig; Ryan Brown; Cem M Deniz; Kenneth A Egol; James S Babb; Ravinder R Regatte; Chamith S Rajapakse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Does thoracic or lumbar spine bone architecture predict vertebral failure strength more accurately than density?

Authors:  E-M Lochmüller; K Pöschl; L Würstlin; M Matsuura; R Müller; T M Link; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  In vivo magnetic resonance detects rapid remodeling changes in the topology of the trabecular bone network after menopause and the protective effect of estradiol.

Authors:  Felix W Wehrli; Glenn A Ladinsky; Catherine Jones; Maria Benito; Jeremy Magland; Branimir Vasilic; Andra M Popescu; Babette Zemel; Andrew J Cucchiara; Alexander C Wright; Hee K Song; Punam K Saha; Helen Peachey; Peter J Snyder
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Letter to the editor concerning: "subdental synchondrosis and anatomy of the axis in aging: a histomorphometric study on 30 autopsy cases by M. Gebauer et al. (2006) Eur Spine J 15(3):292-298".

Authors:  Xiao-Ping Wang; Wei-Li Qi; Kang-Mei Kong; Xin-Jia Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Response to reply to the letter to the editor concerning "Gebauer et al.: Subdental synchondrosis and anatomy of the axis in aging: a histomorphometric study on 30 autopsy cases. Eur Spine J 15(3):292-298, 2006": The basis of the dens axis. Where is it located?

Authors:  Xiao-ping Wang; Zhi-cheng Deng; Zhen-jiao Liang; Yu-min Tu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Adaptations in trabecular bone microarchitecture in Olympic athletes determined by 7T MRI.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; S Kubilay Pakin; Mark E Schweitzer; Punam K Saha; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Clinical and panoramic predictors of femur bone mineral density.

Authors:  Stuart C White; Akira Taguchi; David Kao; Sam Wu; Susan K Service; Douglas Yoon; Yoshikazu Suei; Takashi Nakamoto; Keiji Tanimoto
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-07-27       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  7 Tesla MRI of bone microarchitecture discriminates between women without and with fragility fractures who do not differ by bone mineral density.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Stephen Honig; Yinxiao Liu; Cheng Chen; Kevin K Chu; Chamith S Rajapakse; Kenneth Egol; Ding Xia; Punam K Saha; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Implications of resolution and noise for in vivo micro-MRI of trabecular bone.

Authors:  Charles Q Li; Jeremy F Magland; Chamith S Rajapakse; X Edward Guo; X Henry Zhang; Branimir Vasilic; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.