Literature DB >> 25824566

In vivo measurement reproducibility of femoral neck microarchitectural parameters derived from 3T MR images.

Alexandra Hotca1,2, Chamith S Rajapakse3, Chen Cheng4, Stephen Honig5, Kenneth Egol6, Ravinder R Regatte2, Punam K Saha4, Gregory Chang1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the within-day and between-day measurement reproducibility of in vivo 3D MRI assessment of trabecular bone microarchitecture of the proximal femur.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA)-compliant, Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved study was conducted on 11 healthy subjects (mean age = 57.4 ± 14.1 years) with written informed consent. All subjects underwent a 3T MRI hip scan in vivo (0.234 × 0.234 × 1.5 mm) at three timepoints: baseline, second scan same day (intrascan), and third scan 1 week later (interscan). We applied digital topological analysis and volumetric topological analysis to compute the following microarchitectural parameters within the femoral neck: total bone volume, bone volume fraction, markers of trabecular number (skeleton density), connectivity (junctions), plate-like structure (surfaces), plate width, and trabecular thickness. Reproducibility was assessed using root-mean-square coefficient of variation (RMS-CV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
RESULTS: The within-day RMS-CVs ranged from 2.3% to 7.8%, and the between-day RMS-CVs ranged from 4.0% to 7.3% across all parameters. The within-day ICCs ranged from 0.931 to 0.989, and the between-day ICCs ranged from 0.934 to 0.971 across all parameters.
CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate high reproducibility for trabecular bone microarchitecture measures derived from 3T MR images of the proximal femur. The measurement reproducibility is within a range suitable for clinical cross-sectional and longitudinal studies in osteoporosis.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3T MRI; digital topological analysis; hip; microarchitecture; osteoporosis; volumetric topological analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25824566      PMCID: PMC4589420          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  27 in total

Review 1.  NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy, March 7-29, 2000: highlights of the conference.

Authors: 
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 0.954

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone structure.

Authors:  Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-10

Review 3.  Bone quality: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Bone microarchitecture and strength.

Authors:  David W Dempster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  7 Tesla MRI of bone microarchitecture discriminates between women without and with fragility fractures who do not differ by bone mineral density.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Stephen Honig; Yinxiao Liu; Cheng Chen; Kevin K Chu; Chamith S Rajapakse; Kenneth Egol; Ding Xia; Punam K Saha; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Topological analysis of trabecular bone MR images.

Authors:  B R Gomberg; P K Saha; H K Song; S N Hwang; F W Wehrli
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Effects of salmon calcitonin on trabecular microarchitecture as determined by magnetic resonance imaging: results from the QUEST study.

Authors:  Charles H Chesnut; Sharmilla Majumdar; David C Newitt; Andrew Shields; Jan Van Pelt; Ellen Laschansky; Moise Azria; Audrey Kriegman; Melvin Olson; Erik F Eriksen; Linda Mindeholm
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Three-dimensional in vivo morphometry of trabecular bone in the OVX rat model of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J H Kinney; J T Ryaby; D L Haupt; N E Lane
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.285

9.  Reproducibility and error sources of micro-MRI-based trabecular bone structural parameters of the distal radius and tibia.

Authors:  B R Gomberg; F W Wehrli; B Vasilić; R H Weening; P K Saha; H K Song; A C Wright
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Population-based study of survival after osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  C Cooper; E J Atkinson; S J Jacobsen; W M O'Fallon; L J Melton
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Advances in imaging approaches to fracture risk evaluation.

Authors:  Mary Kate Manhard; Jeffry S Nyman; Mark D Does
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 7.012

Review 2.  MRI assessment of bone structure and microarchitecture.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Sean Boone; Dimitri Martel; Chamith S Rajapakse; Robert S Hallyburton; Mitch Valko; Stephen Honig; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  3-T MR Imaging of Proximal Femur Microarchitecture in Subjects with and without Fragility Fracture and Nonosteoporotic Proximal Femur Bone Mineral Density.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Chamith S Rajapakse; Cheng Chen; Arakua Welbeck; Kenneth Egol; Ravinder R Regatte; Punam K Saha; Stephen Honig
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The reproducibility of measuring trabecular bone parameters using a commercially available high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging approach: A pilot study.

Authors:  Sarah L West; Chamith S Rajapakse; Tammy Rayner; Rhiannon Miller; Michelle A Slinger; Greg D Wells
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2018-04-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.