Literature DB >> 24743262

Accounting for pharmacokinetic differences in dual-tracer receptor density imaging.

K M Tichauer1, M Diop, J T Elliott, K S Samkoe, T Hasan, K St Lawrence, B W Pogue.   

Abstract

Dual-tracer molecular imaging is a powerful approach to quantify receptor expression in a wide range of tissues by using an untargeted tracer to account for any nonspecific uptake of a molecular-targeted tracer. This approach has previously required the pharmacokinetics of the receptor-targeted and untargeted tracers to be identical, requiring careful selection of an ideal untargeted tracer for any given targeted tracer. In this study, methodology capable of correcting for tracer differences in arterial input functions, as well as binding-independent delivery and retention, is derived and evaluated in a mouse U251 glioma xenograft model using an Affibody tracer targeted to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a cell membrane receptor overexpressed in many cancers. Simulations demonstrated that blood, and to a lesser extent vascular-permeability, pharmacokinetic differences between targeted and untargeted tracers could be quantified by deconvolving the uptakes of the two tracers in a region of interest devoid of targeted tracer binding, and therefore corrected for, by convolving the uptake of the untargeted tracer in all regions of interest by the product of the deconvolution. Using fluorescently labeled, EGFR-targeted and untargeted Affibodies (known to have different blood clearance rates), the average tumor concentration of EGFR in four mice was estimated using dual-tracer kinetic modeling to be 3.9 ± 2.4 nM compared to an expected concentration of 2.0 ± 0.4 nM. However, with deconvolution correction a more equivalent EGFR concentration of 2.0 ± 0.4 nM was measured.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24743262      PMCID: PMC4039087          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/10/2341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  24 in total

1.  Deconvolution method for recovering the photon time-of-flight distribution from time-resolved measurements.

Authors:  Mamadou Diop; Keith St Lawrence
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 3.776

Review 2.  Antibody vectors for imaging.

Authors:  Tove Olafsen; Anna M Wu
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.446

3.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging kinetic parameters and molecular weight of dendritic contrast agents in tumor angiogenesis in mice.

Authors:  Quido G de Lussanet; Sander Langereis; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Marcel H P van Genderen; Arjan W Griffioen; Jos M A van Engelshoven; Walter H Backes
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-02-24       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Consensus nomenclature for in vivo imaging of reversibly binding radioligands.

Authors:  Robert B Innis; Vincent J Cunningham; Jacques Delforge; Masahiro Fujita; Albert Gjedde; Roger N Gunn; James Holden; Sylvain Houle; Sung-Cheng Huang; Masanori Ichise; Hidehiro Iida; Hiroshi Ito; Yuichi Kimura; Robert A Koeppe; Gitte M Knudsen; Juhani Knuuti; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Marc Laruelle; Jean Logan; Ralph Paul Maguire; Mark A Mintun; Evan D Morris; Ramin Parsey; Julie C Price; Mark Slifstein; Vesna Sossi; Tetsuya Suhara; John R Votaw; Dean F Wong; Richard E Carson
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  The theory and applications of the exchange of inert gas at the lungs and tissues.

Authors:  S S KETY
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  1951-03       Impact factor: 25.468

6.  Microscopic Delineation of Medulloblastoma Margins in a Transgenic Mouse Model Using a Topically Applied VEGFR-1 Probe.

Authors:  Danni Wang; Ye Chen; Steven Y Leigh; Henry Haeberle; Christopher H Contag; Jonathan T C Liu
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 4.243

7.  In vivo cancer targeting and imaging with semiconductor quantum dots.

Authors:  Xiaohu Gao; Yuanyuan Cui; Richard M Levenson; Leland W K Chung; Shuming Nie
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2004-07-18       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  Phage display selection of Affibody molecules with specific binding to the extracellular domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor.

Authors:  M Friedman; E Nordberg; I Höidén-Guthenberg; H Brismar; G P Adams; F Y Nilsson; J Carlsson; S Ståhl
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 1.650

9.  Direct characterization of arterial input functions by fluorescence imaging of exposed carotid artery to facilitate kinetic analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan T Elliott; Kenneth M Tichauer; Kimberley S Samkoe; Jason R Gunn; Kristian J Sexton; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Nanoparticle accumulation in angiogenic tissues: towards predictable pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Kristin Yaehne; Amy Tekrony; Aisling Clancy; Yiota Gregoriou; John Walker; Kwin Dean; Trinh Nguyen; Amber Doiron; Kristina Rinker; Xiao Yu Jiang; Sarah Childs; David Cramb
Journal:  Small       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 13.281

View more
  17 in total

1.  Pixel-based absorption correction for dual-tracer fluorescence imaging of receptor binding potential.

Authors:  Stephen C Kanick; Kenneth M Tichauer; Jason Gunn; Kimberley S Samkoe; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Correcting for targeted and control agent signal differences in paired-agent molecular imaging of cancer cell-surface receptors.

Authors:  Negar Sadeghipour; Scott C Davis; Kenneth M Tichauer
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Quantitative in vivo immunohistochemistry of epidermal growth factor receptor using a receptor concentration imaging approach.

Authors:  Kimberley S Samkoe; Kenneth M Tichauer; Jason R Gunn; Wendy A Wells; Tayyaba Hasan; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 4.  Quantitative in vivo cell-surface receptor imaging in oncology: kinetic modeling and paired-agent principles from nuclear medicine and optical imaging.

Authors:  Kenneth M Tichauer; Yu Wang; Brian W Pogue; Jonathan T C Liu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Paired-agent imaging for detection of head and neck cancers.

Authors:  Kimberley S Samkoe; Yeonjae Park; Kayla Marra; Eunice Y Chen; Kenneth M Tichauer
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2019-02-26

6.  Generalized paired-agent kinetic model for in vivo quantification of cancer cell-surface receptors under receptor saturation conditions.

Authors:  N Sadeghipour; S C Davis; K M Tichauer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Rinsing paired-agent model (RPAM) to quantify cell-surface receptor concentrations in topical staining applications of thick tissues.

Authors:  Xiaochun Xu; Yu Wang; Jialing Xiang; Jonathan T C Liu; Kenneth M Tichauer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Simultaneous extracellular and intracellular quantification of EGFR using paired-agent imaging in an in ovo tumor model.

Authors:  Kimberley S Samkoe; Emily Schultz; Allison Solanki; Lei Wang; Jesse Korber; Kenneth M Tichauer; Summer L Gibbs
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2019-02-28

9.  Image-derived arterial input function for quantitative fluorescence imaging of receptor-drug binding in vivo.

Authors:  Jonathan T Elliott; Kimberley S Samkoe; Scott C Davis; Jason R Gunn; Keith D Paulsen; David W Roberts; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.207

10.  Quantifying cancer cell receptors with paired-agent fluorescent imaging: a novel method to account for tissue optical property effects.

Authors:  Negar Sadeghipour; Scott C Davis; Kenneth M Tichauer
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2018-02-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.