Literature DB >> 25360349

Pixel-based absorption correction for dual-tracer fluorescence imaging of receptor binding potential.

Stephen C Kanick1, Kenneth M Tichauer2, Jason Gunn1, Kimberley S Samkoe3, Brian W Pogue3.   

Abstract

Ratiometric approaches to quantifying molecular concentrations have been used for decades in microscopy, but have rarely been exploited in vivo until recently. One dual-tracer approach can utilize an untargeted reference tracer to account for non-specific uptake of a receptor-targeted tracer, and ultimately estimate receptor binding potential quantitatively. However, interpretation of the relative dynamic distribution kinetics is confounded by differences in local tissue absorption at the wavelengths used for each tracer. This study simulated the influence of absorption on fluorescence emission intensity and depth sensitivity at typical near-infrared fluorophore wavelength bands near 700 and 800 nm in mouse skin in order to correct for these tissue optical differences in signal detection. Changes in blood volume [1-3%] and hemoglobin oxygen saturation [0-100%] were demonstrated to introduce substantial distortions to receptor binding estimates (error > 30%), whereas sampled depth was relatively insensitive to wavelength (error < 6%). In response, a pixel-by-pixel normalization of tracer inputs immediately post-injection was found to account for spatial heterogeneities in local absorption properties. Application of the pixel-based normalization method to an in vivo imaging study demonstrated significant improvement, as compared with a reference tissue normalization approach.

Entities:  

Keywords:  (170.3660) Light propagation in tissues; (170.3880) Medical and biological imaging; (170.4580) Optical diagnostics for medicine

Year:  2014        PMID: 25360349      PMCID: PMC4206301          DOI: 10.1364/BOE.5.003280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Opt Express        ISSN: 2156-7085            Impact factor:   3.732


  25 in total

Review 1.  Image-guided surgery using invisible near-infrared light: fundamentals of clinical translation.

Authors:  Sylvain Gioux; Hak Soo Choi; John V Frangioni
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.488

Review 2.  Fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  Jeff W Lichtman; José-Angel Conchello
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 3.  Consensus nomenclature for in vivo imaging of reversibly binding radioligands.

Authors:  Robert B Innis; Vincent J Cunningham; Jacques Delforge; Masahiro Fujita; Albert Gjedde; Roger N Gunn; James Holden; Sylvain Houle; Sung-Cheng Huang; Masanori Ichise; Hidehiro Iida; Hiroshi Ito; Yuichi Kimura; Robert A Koeppe; Gitte M Knudsen; Juhani Knuuti; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Marc Laruelle; Jean Logan; Ralph Paul Maguire; Mark A Mintun; Evan D Morris; Ramin Parsey; Julie C Price; Mark Slifstein; Vesna Sossi; Tetsuya Suhara; John R Votaw; Dean F Wong; Richard E Carson
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  Linearized reference tissue parametric imaging methods: application to [11C]DASB positron emission tomography studies of the serotonin transporter in human brain.

Authors:  Masanori Ichise; Jeih-San Liow; Jian-Qiang Lu; Akihiro Takano; Kendra Model; Hiroshi Toyama; Tetsuya Suhara; Kazutoshi Suzuki; Robert B Innis; Richard E Carson
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  The theory and applications of the exchange of inert gas at the lungs and tissues.

Authors:  S S KETY
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  1951-03       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 6.  Optical properties of biological tissues: a review.

Authors:  Steven L Jacques
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  High vascular delivery of EGF, but low receptor binding rate is observed in AsPC-1 tumors as compared to normal pancreas.

Authors:  Kimberley S Samkoe; Kristian Sexton; Kenneth M Tichauer; Shannon K Hextrum; Omar Pardesi; Scott C Davis; Julia A O'Hara; P Jack Hoopes; Tayyaba Hasan; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 8.  Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review.

Authors:  H Maeda; J Wu; T Sawa; Y Matsumura; K Hori
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 9.776

9.  Comparison of Kinetic Models for Dual-Tracer Receptor Concentration Imaging in Tumors.

Authors:  Nazanin Hamzei; Kimberley S Samkoe; Jonathan T Elliott; Robert W Holt; Jason R Gunn; Tayyaba Hasan; Brian W Pogue; Kenneth M Tichauer
Journal:  Austin J Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-03-05

Review 10.  Imaging in the era of molecular oncology.

Authors:  Ralph Weissleder; Mikael J Pittet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  12 in total

1.  Correcting for targeted and control agent signal differences in paired-agent molecular imaging of cancer cell-surface receptors.

Authors:  Negar Sadeghipour; Scott C Davis; Kenneth M Tichauer
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Investigation of the influence of sampling schemes on quantitative dynamic fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  Yunpeng Dai; Xueli Chen; Jipeng Yin; Guodong Wang; Bo Wang; Yonghua Zhan; Yongzhan Nie; Kaichun Wu; Jimin Liang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 3.  Quantitative in vivo cell-surface receptor imaging in oncology: kinetic modeling and paired-agent principles from nuclear medicine and optical imaging.

Authors:  Kenneth M Tichauer; Yu Wang; Brian W Pogue; Jonathan T C Liu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Paired-agent imaging for detection of head and neck cancers.

Authors:  Kimberley S Samkoe; Yeonjae Park; Kayla Marra; Eunice Y Chen; Kenneth M Tichauer
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2019-02-26

5.  Generalized paired-agent kinetic model for in vivo quantification of cancer cell-surface receptors under receptor saturation conditions.

Authors:  N Sadeghipour; S C Davis; K M Tichauer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Identification of a Suitable Untargeted Agent for the Clinical Translation of ABY-029 Paired-Agent Imaging in Fluorescence-Guided Surgery.

Authors:  Cheng Wang; Xiaochun Xu; Sassan Hodge; Eunice Y Chen; P Jack Hoopes; Kenneth M Tichauer; Kimberley S Samkoe
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 3.484

7.  Quantifying cancer cell receptors with paired-agent fluorescent imaging: a novel method to account for tissue optical property effects.

Authors:  Negar Sadeghipour; Scott C Davis; Kenneth M Tichauer
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2018-02-20

8.  Quantification of the binding potential of cell-surface receptors in fresh excised specimens via dual-probe modeling of SERS nanoparticles.

Authors:  Lagnojita Sinha; Yu Wang; Cynthia Yang; Altaz Khan; Jovan G Brankov; Jonathan T C Liu; Kenneth M Tichauer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Paired-Agent Fluorescence Molecular Imaging of Sentinel Lymph Nodes Using Indocyanine Green as a Control Agent for Antibody-Based Targeted Agents.

Authors:  Chengyue Li; Xiaochun Xu; Nathan McMahon; Omar Alhaj Ibrahim; Husain A Sattar; Kenneth M Tichauer
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.161

10.  Fluorescence imaging reversion using spatially variant deconvolution.

Authors:  Maria Anastasopoulou; Dimitris Gorpas; Maximilian Koch; Evangelos Liapis; Sarah Glasl; Uwe Klemm; Angelos Karlas; Tobias Lasser; Vasilis Ntziachristos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.