Literature DB >> 27997381

Generalized paired-agent kinetic model for in vivo quantification of cancer cell-surface receptors under receptor saturation conditions.

N Sadeghipour1, S C Davis, K M Tichauer.   

Abstract

New precision medicine drugs oftentimes act through binding to specific cell-surface cancer receptors, and thus their efficacy is highly dependent on the availability of those receptors and the receptor concentration per cell. Paired-agent molecular imaging can provide quantitative information on receptor status in vivo, especially in tumor tissue; however, to date, published approaches to paired-agent quantitative imaging require that only 'trace' levels of imaging agent exist compared to receptor concentration. This strict requirement may limit applicability, particularly in drug binding studies, which seek to report on a biological effect in response to saturating receptors with a drug moiety. To extend the regime over which paired-agent imaging may be used, this work presents a generalized simplified reference tissue model (GSRTM) for paired-agent imaging developed to approximate receptor concentration in both non-receptor-saturated and receptor-saturated conditions. Extensive simulation studies show that tumor receptor concentration estimates recovered using the GSRTM are more accurate in receptor-saturation conditions than the standard simple reference tissue model (SRTM) (% error (mean  ±  sd): GSRTM 0  ±  1 and SRTM 50  ±  1) and match the SRTM accuracy in non-saturated conditions (% error (mean  ±  sd): GSRTM 5  ±  5 and SRTM 0  ±  5). To further test the approach, GSRTM-estimated receptor concentration was compared to SRTM-estimated values extracted from tumor xenograft in vivo mouse model data. The GSRTM estimates were observed to deviate from the SRTM in tumors with low receptor saturation (which are likely in a saturated regime). Finally, a general 'rule-of-thumb' algorithm is presented to estimate the expected level of receptor saturation that would be achieved in a given tissue provided dose and pharmacokinetic information about the drug or imaging agent being used, and physiological information about the tissue. These studies suggest that the GSRTM is necessary when receptor saturation exceeds 20% and highlight the potential for GSRTM to accurately measure receptor concentrations under saturation conditions, such as might be required during high dose drug studies, or for imaging applications where high concentrations of imaging agent are required to optimize signal-to-noise conditions. This model can also be applied to PET and SPECT imaging studies that tend to suffer from noisier data, but require one less parameter to fit if images are converted to imaging agent concentration (quantitative PET/SPECT).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27997381      PMCID: PMC5226886          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/62/2/394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  47 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of Her2 receptor expression in vivo by near-infrared optical imaging.

Authors:  Victor Chernomordik; Moinuddin Hassan; Sang Bong Lee; Rafal Zielinski; Amir Gandjbakhche; Jacek Capala
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.488

2.  Molecular imaging in cancer.

Authors:  Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Quantitative in vivo analysis of benzodiazepine binding sites in the human brain using positron emission tomography.

Authors:  M Iyo; T Itoh; T Yamasaki; H Fukuda; O Inoue; H Shinotoh; K Suzuki; S Fukui; Y Tateno
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.250

4.  Linearized reference tissue parametric imaging methods: application to [11C]DASB positron emission tomography studies of the serotonin transporter in human brain.

Authors:  Masanori Ichise; Jeih-San Liow; Jian-Qiang Lu; Akihiro Takano; Kendra Model; Hiroshi Toyama; Tetsuya Suhara; Kazutoshi Suzuki; Robert B Innis; Richard E Carson
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 5.  Importance of quantification for the analysis of PET data in oncology: review of current methods and trends for the future.

Authors:  Giampaolo Tomasi; Federico Turkheimer; Eric Aboagye
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Quantitative imaging of protein targets in the human brain with PET.

Authors:  Roger N Gunn; Mark Slifstein; Graham E Searle; Julie C Price
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Improving quantitative CT perfusion parameter measurements using principal component analysis.

Authors:  Timothy Pok Chi Yeung; Mark Dekaban; Nathan De Haan; Laura Morrison; Lisa Hoffman; Yves Bureau; Xiaogang Chen; Slav Yartsev; Glenn Bauman; Ting-Yim Lee
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Single photon emission tomography measurement of benzodiazepine receptor number and affinity in primate brain: a constant infusion paradigm with [123I]iomazenil.

Authors:  M Laruelle; A Abi-Dargham; Z Rattner; M S al-Tikriti; Y Zea-Ponce; S S Zoghbi; D S Charney; J Price; J J Frost; P B Hoffer
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1993-01-05       Impact factor: 4.432

9.  Dynamic dual-tracer MRI-guided fluorescence tomography to quantify receptor density in vivo.

Authors:  Scott C Davis; Kimberley S Samkoe; Kenneth M Tichauer; Kristian J Sexton; Jason R Gunn; Sophie J Deharvengt; Tayyaba Hasan; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Quantification of benzodiazepine receptors in human brain using PET, [11C]flumazenil, and a single-experiment protocol.

Authors:  J Delforge; S Pappata; P Millet; Y Samson; B Bendriem; A Jobert; C Crouzel; A Syrota
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.200

View more
  5 in total

1.  Raman-Encoded Molecular Imaging with Topically Applied SERS Nanoparticles for Intraoperative Guidance of Lumpectomy.

Authors:  Yu Winston Wang; Nicholas P Reder; Soyoung Kang; Adam K Glaser; Qian Yang; Matthew A Wall; Sara H Javid; Suzanne M Dintzis; Jonathan T C Liu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Correcting for targeted and control agent signal differences in paired-agent molecular imaging of cancer cell-surface receptors.

Authors:  Negar Sadeghipour; Scott C Davis; Kenneth M Tichauer
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Quantifying cancer cell receptors with paired-agent fluorescent imaging: a novel method to account for tissue optical property effects.

Authors:  Negar Sadeghipour; Scott C Davis; Kenneth M Tichauer
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2018-02-20

4.  Comparison of cRGDfK Peptide Probes with Appended Shielded Heptamethine Cyanine Dye (s775z) for Near Infrared Fluorescence Imaging of Cancer.

Authors:  Rananjaya S Gamage; Dong-Hao Li; Cynthia L Schreiber; Bradley D Smith
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-10-30

5.  Prediction of optimal contrast times post-imaging agent administration to inform personalized fluorescence-guided surgery.

Authors:  Negar Sadeghipour; Aakanksha Rangnekar; Margaret Folaron; Rendall Strawbridge; Kimberley Samkoe; Scott Davis; Kenneth Tichauer
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 3.170

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.