Literature DB >> 25344226

Quantitative in vivo immunohistochemistry of epidermal growth factor receptor using a receptor concentration imaging approach.

Kimberley S Samkoe1, Kenneth M Tichauer2, Jason R Gunn3, Wendy A Wells4, Tayyaba Hasan5, Brian W Pogue6.   

Abstract

As receptor-targeted therapeutics become increasingly used in clinical oncology, the ability to quantify protein expression and pharmacokinetics in vivo is imperative to ensure successful individualized treatment plans. Current standards for receptor analysis are performed on extracted tissues. These measurements are static and often physiologically irrelevant; therefore, only a partial picture of available receptors for drug targeting in vivo is provided. Until recently, in vivo measurements were limited by the inability to separate delivery, binding, and retention effects, but this can be circumvented by a dual-tracer approach for referencing the detected signal. We hypothesized that in vivo receptor concentration imaging (RCI) would be superior to ex vivo immunohistochemistry (IHC). Using multiple xenograft tumor models with varying EGFR expression, we determined the EGFR concentration in each model using a novel targeted agent (anti-EGFR affibody-IRDye800CW conjugate) along with a simultaneously delivered reference agent (control affibody-IRDye680RD conjugate). The RCI-calculated in vivo receptor concentration was strongly correlated with ex vivo pathologist-scored IHC and computer-quantified ex vivo immunofluorescence. In contrast, no correlation was observed with ex vivo Western blot analysis or in vitro flow-cytometry assays. Overall, our results argue that in vivo RCI provides a robust measure of receptor expression equivalent to ex vivo immunostaining, with implications for use in noninvasive monitoring of therapy or therapeutic guidance during surgery. ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25344226      PMCID: PMC4268352          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  42 in total

Review 1.  Molecular imaging in drug discovery and development.

Authors:  Markus Rudin; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 2.  Immunohistochemistry and quantitative analysis of protein expression.

Authors:  Melissa Cregger; Aaron J Berger; David L Rimm
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.534

3.  Cardiac beta-adrenergic receptor density measured in vivo using PET, CGP 12177, and a new graphical method.

Authors:  J Delforge; A Syrota; J P Lançon; K Nakajima; C Loc'h; M Janier; J M Vallois; J Cayla; C Crouzel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 4.  Importance of quantification for the analysis of PET data in oncology: review of current methods and trends for the future.

Authors:  Giampaolo Tomasi; Federico Turkheimer; Eric Aboagye
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Simplified reference tissue model for PET receptor studies.

Authors:  A A Lammertsma; S P Hume
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  A quantitative Western Blot method for protein measurement.

Authors:  C A Dennis-Sykes; W J Miller; W J McAleer
Journal:  J Biol Stand       Date:  1985-10

7.  Apparent synaptic dopamine deficiency induced by withdrawal from chronic cocaine treatment.

Authors:  M W Robertson; C A Leslie; J P Bennett
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1991-01-11       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  SPECT quantification of [123I]iomazenil binding to benzodiazepine receptors in nonhuman primates: II. Equilibrium analysis of constant infusion experiments and correlation with in vitro parameters.

Authors:  M Laruelle; A Abi-Dargham; M S al-Tikriti; R M Baldwin; Y Zea-Ponce; S S Zoghbi; D S Charney; P B Hoffer; R B Innis
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.200

9.  Quantitative western blot analysis and spot immunodetection using time-resolved fluorometry.

Authors:  E P Diamandis; T K Christopoulos; C C Bean
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1992-03-04       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  Strong HER-2/neu protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry often does not predict oncogene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Lauren Hammock; Melinda Lewis; Carol Phillips; Cynthia Cohen
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.466

View more
  32 in total

1.  Review of fluorescence guided surgery visualization and overlay techniques.

Authors:  Jonathan T Elliott; Alisha V Dsouza; Scott C Davis; Jonathan D Olson; Keith D Paulsen; David W Roberts; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Vision 20/20: Molecular-guided surgical oncology based upon tumor metabolism or immunologic phenotype: Technological pathways for point of care imaging and intervention.

Authors:  Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen; Kimberley S Samkoe; Jonathan T Elliott; Tayyaba Hasan; Theresa V Strong; Daniel R Draney; Joachim Feldwisch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Correcting for targeted and control agent signal differences in paired-agent molecular imaging of cancer cell-surface receptors.

Authors:  Negar Sadeghipour; Scott C Davis; Kenneth M Tichauer
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Development and evaluation of a connective tissue phantom model for subsurface visualization of cancers requiring wide local excision.

Authors:  Kimberley S Samkoe; Brent D Bates; Niki N Tselepidakis; Alisha V DSouza; Jason R Gunn; Dipak B Ramkumar; Keith D Paulsen; Brian W Pogue; Eric R Henderson
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Is Tumor Cell Specificity Distinct from Tumor Selectivity In Vivo?: A Quantitative NIR Molecular Imaging Analysis of Nanoliposome Targeting.

Authors:  Girgis Obaid; Kimberley Samkoe; Kenneth Tichauer; Shazia Bano; Yeonjae Park; Zachary Silber; Sassan Hodge; Susan Callaghan; Mina Guirguis; Srivalleesha Mallidi; Brian Pogue; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  Nano Res       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 8.897

6.  Simultaneous In Vivo Fluorescent Markers for Perfusion, Protoporphyrin Metabolism, and EGFR Expression for Optically Guided Identification of Orthotopic Glioma.

Authors:  Jonathan T Elliott; Kayla Marra; Linton T Evans; Scott C Davis; Kimberley S Samkoe; Joachim Feldwisch; Keith D Paulsen; David W Roberts; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Quantitative in vivo cell-surface receptor imaging in oncology: kinetic modeling and paired-agent principles from nuclear medicine and optical imaging.

Authors:  Kenneth M Tichauer; Yu Wang; Brian W Pogue; Jonathan T C Liu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  Review of fluorescence guided surgery systems: identification of key performance capabilities beyond indocyanine green imaging.

Authors:  Alisha V DSouza; Huiyun Lin; Eric R Henderson; Kimberley S Samkoe; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.170

9.  Quantitative imaging of receptor-ligand engagement in intact live animals.

Authors:  Alena Rudkouskaya; Nattawut Sinsuebphon; Jamie Ward; Kate Tubbesing; Xavier Intes; Margarida Barroso
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 9.776

10.  Simultaneous extracellular and intracellular quantification of EGFR using paired-agent imaging in an in ovo tumor model.

Authors:  Kimberley S Samkoe; Emily Schultz; Allison Solanki; Lei Wang; Jesse Korber; Kenneth M Tichauer; Summer L Gibbs
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2019-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.