Literature DB >> 24420443

Direct characterization of arterial input functions by fluorescence imaging of exposed carotid artery to facilitate kinetic analysis.

Jonathan T Elliott1, Kenneth M Tichauer, Kimberley S Samkoe, Jason R Gunn, Kristian J Sexton, Brian W Pogue.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: With the goal of facilitating tracer kinetic analysis in small-animal planar fluorescence imaging, an experimental method for characterizing tracer arterial input functions is presented. The proposed method involves exposing the common carotid arteries by surgical dissection, which can then be imaged directly during tracer injection and clearance. PROCEDURES: Arterial concentration curves of IRDye-700DX-carboxylate, IRDye-800CW-EGF, and IRDye-800CW conjugated to anti-EGFR Affibody are recovered from athymic female mice (n = 12) by directly imaging exposed vessels. Images were acquired with two imaging protocols: a slow-kinetics approach (temporal resolution = 45 s) to recover the arterial curves from two tracers simultaneously, and a fast-kinetics approach (temporal resolution = 500 ms) to characterize the first-pass peak of a single tracer. Arterial input functions obtained by the carotid imaging technique, as well as plasma curves measured by blood sampling were fit with a biexponential pharmacokinetic model.
RESULTS: Pharmacological fast- and slow-phase rate constants recovered with the proposed method were 0.37 ± 0.26 and 0.007 ± 0.001 min(-1), respectively, for the IRDye700DX-C. For the IRDye800CW-EGF, the rate constants were 0.11 ± 0.13 and 0.003 ± 0.002 min(-1). These rate constants did not differ significantly from those calculated previously by blood sampling, as determined by an F test; however, the between-subject variability was four times lower for arterial curves recovered using the proposed technique, compared with blood sampling.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed technique enables the direct characterization of arterial input functions for kinetic analysis. As this method requires no additional instrumentation, it is immediately deployable in commercially available planar fluorescence imaging systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24420443      PMCID: PMC4098018          DOI: 10.1007/s11307-013-0715-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol        ISSN: 1536-1632            Impact factor:   3.488


  22 in total

Review 1.  In vivo near-infrared fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  John V Frangioni
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 8.822

2.  Imaging targeted-agent binding in vivo with two probes.

Authors:  Brian W Pogue; Kimberley S Samkoe; Shannon Hextrum; Julia A O'Hara; Michael Jermyn; Subhadra Srinivasan; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  On impulse response functions computed from dynamic contrast-enhanced image data by algebraic deconvolution and compartmental modeling.

Authors:  Gunnar Brix; Mona Salehi Ravesh; Stefan Zwick; Jürgen Griebel; Stefan Delorme
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 2.685

4.  Dynamic CT measurement of cerebral blood flow: a validation study.

Authors:  A Cenic; D G Nabavi; R A Craen; A W Gelb; T Y Lee
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Kinetic model optimization for characterizing tumour physiology by dynamic contrast-enhanced near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  K St Lawrence; K Verdecchia; J Elliott; K Tichauer; M Diop; L Hoffman; T-Y Lee
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  High vascular delivery of EGF, but low receptor binding rate is observed in AsPC-1 tumors as compared to normal pancreas.

Authors:  Kimberley S Samkoe; Kristian Sexton; Kenneth M Tichauer; Shannon K Hextrum; Omar Pardesi; Scott C Davis; Julia A O'Hara; P Jack Hoopes; Tayyaba Hasan; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Activatable cell penetrating peptides linked to nanoparticles as dual probes for in vivo fluorescence and MR imaging of proteases.

Authors:  Emilia S Olson; Tao Jiang; Todd A Aguilera; Quyen T Nguyen; Lesley G Ellies; Miriam Scadeng; Roger Y Tsien
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  In vivo cancer targeting and imaging with semiconductor quantum dots.

Authors:  Xiaohu Gao; Yuanyuan Cui; Richard M Levenson; Leland W K Chung; Shuming Nie
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2004-07-18       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Dynamic dual-tracer MRI-guided fluorescence tomography to quantify receptor density in vivo.

Authors:  Scott C Davis; Kimberley S Samkoe; Kenneth M Tichauer; Kristian J Sexton; Jason R Gunn; Sophie J Deharvengt; Tayyaba Hasan; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Video-rate fluorescence diffuse optical tomography for in vivo sentinel lymph node imaging.

Authors:  Metasebya Solomon; Brian R White; Ralph E Nothdruft; Walter Akers; Gail Sudlow; Adam T Eggebrecht; Samuel Achilefu; Joseph P Culver
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.732

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative in vivo cell-surface receptor imaging in oncology: kinetic modeling and paired-agent principles from nuclear medicine and optical imaging.

Authors:  Kenneth M Tichauer; Yu Wang; Brian W Pogue; Jonathan T C Liu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Paired-agent imaging for detection of head and neck cancers.

Authors:  Kimberley S Samkoe; Yeonjae Park; Kayla Marra; Eunice Y Chen; Kenneth M Tichauer
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2019-02-26

3.  Accounting for pharmacokinetic differences in dual-tracer receptor density imaging.

Authors:  K M Tichauer; M Diop; J T Elliott; K S Samkoe; T Hasan; K St Lawrence; B W Pogue
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Image-derived arterial input function for quantitative fluorescence imaging of receptor-drug binding in vivo.

Authors:  Jonathan T Elliott; Kimberley S Samkoe; Scott C Davis; Jason R Gunn; Keith D Paulsen; David W Roberts; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.207

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.