Literature DB >> 28548970

Rinsing paired-agent model (RPAM) to quantify cell-surface receptor concentrations in topical staining applications of thick tissues.

Xiaochun Xu1, Yu Wang, Jialing Xiang, Jonathan T C Liu, Kenneth M Tichauer.   

Abstract

Conventional molecular assessment of tissue through histology, if adapted to fresh thicker samples, has the potential to enhance cancer detection in surgical margins and monitoring of 3D cell culture molecular environments. However, in thicker samples, substantial background staining is common despite repeated rinsing, which can significantly reduce image contrast. Recently, 'paired-agent' methods-which employ co-administration of a control (untargeted) imaging agent-have been applied to thick-sample staining applications to account for background staining. To date, these methods have included (1) a simple ratiometric method that is relatively insensitive to noise in the data but has accuracy that is dependent on the staining protocol and the characteristics of the sample; and (2) a complex paired-agent kinetic modeling method that is more accurate but is more noise-sensitive and requires a precise serial rinsing protocol. Here, a new simplified mathematical model-the rinsing paired-agent model (RPAM)-is derived and tested that offers a good balance between the previous models, is adaptable to arbitrary rinsing-imaging protocols, and does not require calibration of the imaging system. RPAM is evaluated against previous models and is validated by comparison to estimated concentrations of targeted biomarkers on the surface of 3D cell culture and tumor xenograft models. This work supports the use of RPAM as a preferable model to quantitatively analyze targeted biomarker concentrations in topically stained thick tissues, as it was found to match the accuracy of the complex paired-agent kinetic model while retaining the low noise-sensitivity characteristics of the ratiometric method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28548970      PMCID: PMC5817640          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa6cf1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  53 in total

1.  Imaging mass spectrometry: a new technology for the analysis of protein expression in mammalian tissues.

Authors:  M Stoeckli; P Chaurand; D E Hallahan; R M Caprioli
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 2.  Genomics, gene expression and DNA arrays.

Authors:  D J Lockhart; E A Winzeler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  3D cell culture: a review of current approaches and techniques.

Authors:  John W Haycock
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2011

Review 4.  Consensus nomenclature for in vivo imaging of reversibly binding radioligands.

Authors:  Robert B Innis; Vincent J Cunningham; Jacques Delforge; Masahiro Fujita; Albert Gjedde; Roger N Gunn; James Holden; Sylvain Houle; Sung-Cheng Huang; Masanori Ichise; Hidehiro Iida; Hiroshi Ito; Yuichi Kimura; Robert A Koeppe; Gitte M Knudsen; Juhani Knuuti; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Marc Laruelle; Jean Logan; Ralph Paul Maguire; Mark A Mintun; Evan D Morris; Ramin Parsey; Julie C Price; Mark Slifstein; Vesna Sossi; Tetsuya Suhara; John R Votaw; Dean F Wong; Richard E Carson
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  Self-assembled plasmonic vesicles of SERS-encoded amphiphilic gold nanoparticles for cancer cell targeting and traceable intracellular drug delivery.

Authors:  Jibin Song; Jiajing Zhou; Hongwei Duan
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension.

Authors:  E Cukierman; R Pankov; D R Stevens; K M Yamada
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-11-23       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Rapid ratiometric biomarker detection with topically applied SERS nanoparticles.

Authors:  Yu Winston Wang; Altaz Khan; Madhura Som; Danni Wang; Ye Chen; Steven Y Leigh; Daphne Meza; Patrick Z McVeigh; Brian C Wilson; Jonathan T C Liu
Journal:  Technology (Singap World Sci)       Date:  2014-06-01

8.  Molecular imaging of glucose uptake in oral neoplasia following topical application of fluorescently labeled deoxy-glucose.

Authors:  Nitin Nitin; Alicia L Carlson; Tim Muldoon; Adel K El-Naggar; Ann Gillenwater; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Kinetics of binding, endocytosis, and recycling of EGF receptor mutants.

Authors:  S Felder; J LaVin; A Ullrich; J Schlessinger
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Confocal microscopy of unfixed breast needle core biopsies: a comparison to fixed and stained sections.

Authors:  Linda M Schiffhauer; J Neil Boger; Thomas A Bonfiglio; James M Zavislan; Margarita Zuley; Christi Alessi Fox
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  2 in total

1.  Quantifying cancer cell receptors with paired-agent fluorescent imaging: a novel method to account for tissue optical property effects.

Authors:  Negar Sadeghipour; Scott C Davis; Kenneth M Tichauer
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2018-02-20

2.  Comparison of cRGDfK Peptide Probes with Appended Shielded Heptamethine Cyanine Dye (s775z) for Near Infrared Fluorescence Imaging of Cancer.

Authors:  Rananjaya S Gamage; Dong-Hao Li; Cynthia L Schreiber; Bradley D Smith
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-10-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.