Literature DB >> 24740273

Current management of penile implant infections, device reliability, and optimizing cosmetic outcome.

John J Mulcahy1, Andrew Kramer, William O Brant, Justin L Parker, Paul E Perito, Jeremy B Myers, Richard Bryson, Meagan Dunne.   

Abstract

Penile implants hold a major position in the treatment algorithm for patients with erectile dysfunction who find medications and vacuum erection devices ineffective or unsatisfactory. As with any surgical procedure, adverse events may occur. The infection rate associated with implant placement has been lowered to the range of 1 % or less due to multifactorial improvements including no-touch techniques, the use of antibiotic-coated devices, and improved quality measures in the operating room. Urologists have been proactive in employing techniques and procedures which minimize loss of erectile length, hence enhancing patient satisfaction. Flat reservoirs have been developed and techniques of placing these to avoid problems in the space of Retzius have reduced complication rates as well. Device reliability has improved to the point that penile implants are among the most durable mechanical surgical products that contribute to patient and partner satisfaction, which is by far the greatest among all the treatments of erectile dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24740273     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-014-0413-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   3.092


  48 in total

1.  Surgical management of penile prosthesis complications.

Authors:  J J Mulcahy
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.896

2.  Inflatable penile prosthesis placement in men with Peyronie's disease and drug-resistant erectile dysfunction: A single-center study.

Authors:  Laurence A Levine; Jonas Benson; Christopher Hoover
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  Use of the malleable penile prosthesis in the treatment of erectile dysfunction: a prospective study of postoperative adjustment.

Authors:  D J Krauss; L J Lantinga; M P Carey; A W Meisler; C M Kelly
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Mechanical reliability and safety of, and patient satisfaction with the Ambicor inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a 2 center study.

Authors:  L A Levine; C R Estrada; A Morgentaler
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  AMS three-piece inflatable implants for erectile dysfunction: a long-term multi-institutional study in 200 consecutive patients.

Authors:  F Montorsi; P Rigatti; G Carmignani; C Corbu; B Campo; G Ordesi; G Breda; P Silvestre; B Giammusso; G Morgia; A Graziottin
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Simultaneous penile lengthening and penile prosthesis implantation in patients with Peyronie's disease, refractory erectile dysfunction, and severe penile shortening.

Authors:  Salvatore Sansalone; Giulio Garaffa; Rados Djinovic; Paulo Egydio; Giuseppe Vespasiani; Roberto Miano; Carla Loreto; David J Ralph
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Mechanical reliability of AMS 700 CX improved by parylene coating.

Authors:  Emad A Salem; Steven K Wilson; Andrew Neeb; John R Delk; Mario A Cleves
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  High submuscular placement of urologic prosthetic balloons and reservoirs via transscrotal approach.

Authors:  Allen F Morey; Christopher A Cefalu; Steven J Hudak
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  Malleable implant substitution for the management of penile prosthesis pump erosion: a pilot study.

Authors:  Tobias S Köhler; Joshua K Modder; James M Dupree; Nicol C Bush; Kevin T McVary
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.802

10.  Long-term survival of inflatable penile prostheses: single surgical group experience with 2,384 first-time implants spanning two decades.

Authors:  Steven K Wilson; John R Delk; Emad A Salem; Mario A Cleves
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.802

View more
  4 in total

1.  Manufacturers' data show increasing implanted cylinder sizes and measured corporal lengths in inflatable penile implants.

Authors:  Charles Welliver; Michael Kottwitz; Ardalan E Ahmad; Steven K Wilson; Tobias S Köhler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Clinical Outcome: Patient and Partner Satisfaction after Penile Implant Surgery.

Authors:  Cedric Jorissen; Helene De Bruyna; Evert Baten; Koenraad Van Renterghem
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2019-10-01

Review 3.  Preoperative counseling and expectation management for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation.

Authors:  Gopal L Narang; Bradley D Figler; Robert M Coward
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-11

4.  Risk factors associated with penile prosthesis infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alejandro Carvajal; Johana Benavides; Herney Andrés García-Perdomo; Gerard D Henry
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.896

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.