Literature DB >> 17627751

Long-term survival of inflatable penile prostheses: single surgical group experience with 2,384 first-time implants spanning two decades.

Steven K Wilson1, John R Delk, Emad A Salem, Mario A Cleves.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Long-term revision-free survival, greater than 10 years has never been reported for inflatable penile prostheses. We conducted a historical prospective study to estimate 10 and 15 years survival of first time (virgin) implantations in 2,384 patients with four different models. AIM: Evaluation of 10- and 15-year mechanical and overall revision-free survival of inflatable penile prostheses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Kaplan-Meier product limit method, and comparison using the log rank test, were used to estimate the 10- and 15-year revision-free survival.
METHODS: Data were obtained from medical records and patient interviews, entered into a computerized database, and analyzed by a third party. Information included implant type, date, revision history with date, and reason. Fourteen different inflatables were examined. Mentor Alpha 1, Mentor Alpha NB, AMS 700 CX, and AMS 700 Ultrex had usage for an extended period of time. Because of failure times being confounded as a result of prior implants, only virgin implants were examined.
RESULTS: For the entire series, estimated 10-year revision-free survival for all reasons was 68.5% and the 15-year revision-free survival was 59.7%. Freedom from mechanical breakage at 10 years was 79.4%; 15 years was 71.2%. Recent mechanically enhanced models did even better. In 1992, Mentor Alpha added pump reinforcement to forestall mechanical breakage. This improved 10-year survival from 65.3% to 88.6% (P = 0.0001). In January 2001, AMS CX added a parylene coating to the cylinders that increased 3-year mechanical survival from 88.4 to 97.9% (P = 0.0002).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report on long-term reliability of inflatable penile prostheses. We estimated 60% of these virgin implants would survive 15 or more years without revision or extraction. Newer enhanced models are currently available, and our tracking predicts even better long-term survival for these devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17627751     DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00540.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  39 in total

1.  An unusual surgical success with a defective penile prosthesis.

Authors:  Chen Zhao; Bo Ram Choi; Young Beom Jeong; Jong Kwan Park
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  A practical overview of considerations for penile prosthesis placement.

Authors:  Landon Trost; Philip Wanzek; George Bailey
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Incarcerated inguinal hernia and small bowel obstruction as a rare complication of a penile prosthesis.

Authors:  S J Serio; P Schafer; A M Merchant
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Comparison of infrapubic versus transcrotal approaches for inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a multi-institution report.

Authors:  L W Trost; A G Boonjindasup; W J G Hellstrom
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 5.  Infection Prevention Considerations for Complex Penile Prosthesis Recipients.

Authors:  Robert J Carrasquillo; Ricardo M Munarriz; Martin S Gross
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  Prevalence of post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction and a review of the recommended therapeutic modalities.

Authors:  Thiago Fernandes Negris Lima; Joshua Bitran; Fabio Stefano Frech; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.896

7.  Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction rates among elderly male aged ≥75 years with inflatable penile prosthesis implant for medically refractory erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Eric Chung; Matt Solomon; Ling DeYoung; Gerald B Brock
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Current management of penile implant infections, device reliability, and optimizing cosmetic outcome.

Authors:  John J Mulcahy; Andrew Kramer; William O Brant; Justin L Parker; Paul E Perito; Jeremy B Myers; Richard Bryson; Meagan Dunne
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Trends in penile prosthesis implantation and analysis of predictive factors for removal.

Authors:  Kai Li; Eileen R Brandes; Steven L Chang; Jeffrey J Leow; Benjamin I Chung; Ye Wang; Jairam R Eswara
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Understanding and Managing Erectile Dysfunction in Patients Treated for Cancer.

Authors:  Maria Voznesensky; Kiran Annam; Karl J Kreder
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.