Literature DB >> 23216955

High submuscular placement of urologic prosthetic balloons and reservoirs via transscrotal approach.

Allen F Morey1, Christopher A Cefalu, Steven J Hudak.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Traditional placement of inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) reservoirs and/or artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) balloons into the space of Retzius may be challenging following major pelvic surgery. AIM: The aim of this study is to report our 1-year experience using a novel technique for high balloon/reservoir placement beneath the rectus abdominus muscle, thus completely obviating deep pelvic dissection during prosthetic urologic surgery.
METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent IPP and/or AUS placement between June 2011 and June 2012 was performed. All had AUS balloons and/or IPP reservoirs placed in a submuscular location by bluntly tunneling through the external inguinal ring into a potential space between the transversalis fascia and the rectus abdominus muscle using a long, angled, lung grasping clamp. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient demographics, perioperative outcomes, and initial follow-up patient-reported outcomes were reviewed.
RESULTS: During the study period, 120 submuscular balloons/reservoirs were inserted in 107 consecutive patients who underwent placement of an IPP (61 patients), AUS (33 patients), or both (13 patients). Among our 48 most recent patients, 41 (85%) reported they were totally unable to feel their balloon/reservoir, and all but two patients reported no bother from the submuscular balloon/reservoir placement. Of the 120 total submuscular balloons and reservoirs, surgical time and outcomes of the prosthetic procedures appeared similar to those placed using traditional methods; two reservoirs required revision surgery for repositioning.
CONCLUSIONS: High submuscular placement of genitourinary prosthetic balloons and reservoirs via a transscrotal approach is both safely and effective, while avoiding deep retropubic dissection.
© 2012 International Society for Sexual Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23216955     DOI: 10.1111/jsm.12000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  21 in total

Review 1.  Alternative Reservoir and Balloon Placement in Complex Patients Undergoing Urologic Prostheses.

Authors:  Travis J Pagliara; Daniel W Smith; Boyd R Viers; Allen F Morey
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Innovating Incrementally: Development of the Modern Inflatable Penile Prosthesis.

Authors:  Mark Ehlers; Benjamin McCormick; R Matthew Coward; Bradley D Figler
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Reservoir Placement Considerations During Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Surgery.

Authors:  Steven J Hudak
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Dual implantation of penile prosthesis and ATOMS® system for post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Marco Falcone; Mirko Preto; Enrico Ammirati; Gideon Blecher; Roberto Carone; Paolo Gontero; Alessandro Giammò
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 2.896

5.  A retrospective analysis of risk factors for IPP reservoir entry into the peritoneum after abdominal wall placement.

Authors:  M S Gross; D S Stember; B B Garber; P E Perito
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.896

6.  Case report of deep vein thrombosis caused by artificial urinary sphincter reservoir compressing right external iliac vein.

Authors:  Marcus J Yip; Ashu Jhamb; Jeremy R Goad
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

7.  Case series - Small bowel obstruction secondary to retained male urinary and sexual prostheses reservoirs.

Authors:  Justin Loloi; Jonathan Davila; Mustufa Babar; Josh Gottlieb; Pedro Maria; Jillian Donnelly; Alexander C Small
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.052

Review 8.  Current management of penile implant infections, device reliability, and optimizing cosmetic outcome.

Authors:  John J Mulcahy; Andrew Kramer; William O Brant; Justin L Parker; Paul E Perito; Jeremy B Myers; Richard Bryson; Meagan Dunne
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 9.  Penile Implant Considerations in the Bladder Cancer Survivor.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Loh-Doyle
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  An update on oxidized regenerated cellulose (fibrillar™) in reducing postoperative corporal bleeding following inflatable penile prosthesis surgery.

Authors:  Avery R Wolfe; Michael T Davenport; Alexander T Rozanski; Nabeel A Shakir; Ellen E Ward; Mary L West; Allen F Morey
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.