Literature DB >> 19619145

Mechanical reliability of AMS 700 CX improved by parylene coating.

Emad A Salem1, Steven K Wilson, Andrew Neeb, John R Delk, Mario A Cleves.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Parylene coating was added to the silicone layers of the American Medical Systems (AMS) 700 controlled expansion (CX) penile prosthesis cylinders in January 2001. The coating was placed on non-tissue contacting silicone surfaces to increase lubricity, reduce friction, and silicone wear AIM: We compared mechanical reliability of the original and Parylene-enhanced AMS 700 CX in a large single surgical group series.
METHODS: Seven hundred seventy-five consecutive patients receiving the AMS 700CX prosthesis (596 first time [virgin] and 179 revisions) were followed for 3 years. Four hundred fourteen received the non-coated model and 361 received the Parylene-coated device. Revision-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method and compared using the log-rank test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We calculated overall survival from revision for any reason and survival from mechanical problems such as fluid leakage, cylinder, connector or tubing breakage, pump or reservoir defects.
RESULTS: For the entire series (virgin + revised) the 3-year revision free survival for any cause improved from 78.6% for non-coated to 87.4% for the Parylene-coated implants. Freedom from mechanical breakage showed similar improvement from 89.2% for the non-coated to 97.5% for enhanced models.
CONCLUSIONS: This study documents that short-term mechanical reliability and survival from revision for any cause is significantly increased with Parylene-coated AMS 700CX cylinders compared with the earlier AMS 700CX model with non-coated cylinders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19619145     DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01382.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  6 in total

Review 1.  Innovating Incrementally: Development of the Modern Inflatable Penile Prosthesis.

Authors:  Mark Ehlers; Benjamin McCormick; R Matthew Coward; Bradley D Figler
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Current management of penile implant infections, device reliability, and optimizing cosmetic outcome.

Authors:  John J Mulcahy; Andrew Kramer; William O Brant; Justin L Parker; Paul E Perito; Jeremy B Myers; Richard Bryson; Meagan Dunne
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Penile prosthesis implant: scientific advances and technological innovations over the last four decades.

Authors:  Eric Chung
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-02

Review 4.  Narrative review of penile prosthetic implant technology and surgical results, including transgender patients.

Authors:  Michael Polchert; Brian Dick; Omer Raheem
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06

Review 5.  Penile prosthesis surgery in the management of erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Hossein Sadeghi-Nejad; Mina Fam
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2013-07-02

6.  Comparison of the patient and partner satisfaction with 700CX and Titan penile prostheses.

Authors:  Javier Romero Otero; César Rojas Cruz; Borja García Gómez; Joaquim Sarquella Geli; Jose Medina Polo; Eduard Ruiz Castañé; Alfredo Rodríguez Antolín
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.